http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/gay-males-and-sexual-practices.526221/ The intention of the closed discussion was to show that there is a difference between males who have intercourse with males, or MSM, and gay identifying males. And that if non identifying persons can engage in sexual activity with a sex they do not identify themselves being a part of, such as gay male, then maybe to them having intercourse with a woman or man is the same. And if there is no difference for them, then where would any difference come in? And the concern about this is NOT their sexual partners but the receiving and passing of stds as well as mental clarity. Can such persons be 'more' prone to NOT keep to norms such as personal safety and others' physical well being? Could they be apt into becoming violent and dangerous over simple things? Could they be more sensitive to disrespect or violations to themselves?? Etc..... Or could they have other forms of personality traits such as no care whatsoever of anything? Party hard? You only live once? These males can't be too unsociable, right? They need to have some kind of verbal rapport with the partners, right? From the way I see it, it would be more of a who cares thing than a secret discreet thing. Males who have sex with other males while being in a male and female orgy is an example. It isn't unheard of. Pompei, the city, was supposedly like this. In fact many of the pictures and statues in the closed discussion link was found in Pompeii also. Mount Vesuvius, named after the Greek 'goddess' Venus, the 'deity of love and war' and Pompeii are in the same account of what archeologists put together after they found the ruins of Pompeii. The archeologists found bodies still conjoined in sexual acts as well as some which appeared to be engaging in orgies. They even found toddlers sitting no more than 10 feet away from the adults engaging in sexualities, in their findings.
