'When has it ever become legal to shoot someone because they’re pulling off in your car?'

well, depends on who they voted for

 

How about a context you understand? What of NRA members? (Also does your answer apply across the various NRA groups?)

 

I double dog dare you to paste up anything from my post supporting the execution of all violent felons.

 

Whenever an armed citizen kills a violent felon in the act the community as a whole benefits.
The more often that happens the greater the social and community benefit.

 

The best defense against every kind of dangerous felon is an armed citizenry.

 

Perhaps you don't understand what you type? You've referred to violent criminals as a cancer and, when they die, the community benefits. Think it through now! Let me know if it's just internet warrioring bluster. Perhaps you saw the Deathwish remake and actually thought it was better than the original?

 

You and your constant Fairy stories.

Eliminate all the garbage and admit that Defensive Gun uses are a reality, you know you want to.

 

IOW, you could not find anything from my posts advocating the execution of all felons.
Why make stuff like that up up?

 

The argument being presented on the part of yourself is that deaths due to incidents of property-related theft are too isolated and rare to constitute proper concern for an individual to fear harm from someone attempting to steal their property, and that one should simply allow the theft of property to occur since they are not realistically in danger according to statistics.

The question being presented is a matter of how many deaths being too many to be considered acceptable?

 

Factually incorrect. Law enforcement is allowed to deploy deadly force in response to a fleeing suspect so long as they claim they believe it was necessary. There is no actual proof that is necessary for such to be justified.

They are not.

 

Ahhh, you struggle with logic. No problem!

 

IOW, you are unable to paste up anything from my posts calling for the execution of all felons.
Again, why make stuff like that up when you know you will be caught? Think.

 

Nope. Wrong. As usual.

 

Explain how it is incorrect.

 

Conservatives want to be able to murder people who steal a loaf of bread.

its really sickening

 

A factually deficient claim on the part of yourself, being presented from the perspective of one defending the actions and bad decisions of criminal individuals who do not value the lives of anyone but themselves.

 

no., i simply dont believe that stealing a toaster or a loaf of breag deserves the death penalty

 

At what value of property would you justify shooting? A million dollar piece of jewelry? A multi generation irreplaceable famly heirloom? A life savings toward a dream? What is your value point (if you say, only to save a life, I won’t believe you).

 

My post, that you originally replied to, was just merely pointing out that based on actual statistics, the majority of time break-ins are about material possessions. That’s it. Nothing more, nothing less.
None of which has to do with mass shootings. Nowhere did I argue that one should allow theft of property to continue. Nowhere did I argue about implementing local or nationwide policies.

 

a firearm

 

But think about it, if a man steals my toaster oven and my loaf of bread, he can make TOAST !
Oh the humanity !
The horror !
What happened to the butter ?

 

A $150 High-Point pistol ?

 

any firearm.

 

I have not seen anyone here advocating the death penalty for theft of property.

 

allowing a home owner shoot to kill someone running a way with a toaster, is as good as the death penalty