While others woo Florida, Ron Paul’s strategy is to rack up delegates in February

Wel Paul should do well in getting the kook vote

Other than that, he is a waste of space on the trail and on the ballot

 

Its ok, Not everyone understands how the delegate system or the caucus system works. I would explain it to you but It would be a waste of my time. You, just like Red state have been proven liars on these forums and when you get called on it you attack the poster and then run from the truth. Its been proven over and over....you both have no integrity.

Go ahead and keep following MSM, No loss to the cause of liberty. We have to accept some folks are just plaine ignorant of real world events.

 

Glad to see that you finally rolled out of bed. Typically Ron Paul fanatic. Probably sleeping off your hang-over from all last night's locally micro-brewed beer...


I'll be coming after you, in a couple months, when Ron Paul is completely and totally out of the race. Then we'll talk about who doesn't understand how the delegate system works. Until then, you keep drinking that Kool-Aid!

 

We know how it works and we know that you're absolutely counting on delegates that were not earned at the ballot box. That is both stupid and desperate. You somehow have deluded yourself into "thinking," that UNCOMMITTED DELEGATES, are Paul delegates. They are not, they are uncommitted, and the greatest chance is that they WILL follow the vote from their area, meaning when they do commit, it won't be to Paul.

Romney 98
Santorum 44
Gingrich 32
Paul 20

That # 4 in a 4 man race, otherwise he'd be lower. As other candidates have dropped out, NONE of their support went to Paul. Must surely be a conspiracy.

 

Where are all the examples of double talk you said ron paul does'?

Where did you prove he lied about abortion?

Why do you keep running from these simple questions? After all these were YOUR claims.

 

where in your video does Ron Paul state that we deserved 911?????/

Where has anyone in Ron Pauls campaign said that those Americans deserved to die on 911?


This is YOUR claim....This is what you spammed the threads with.

WHERE IS YOUR PROOF LOL

you are going to run again arent you....

You always run

Run rabbit run.

 

He implies that we deserved 9/11.

 

Your choice of using the word "deserved" also implies he supports the Terrorist actions on 9/11 which is something that he never supported or even in the slightest said those people deserved to die. So why don't use a better form instead of implying that he is an Al Qaeda sympathizer and believed the People who died to be just.

 

What he implies - IMO - is that many of America's foreign policy actions created a tremendous amount of anger in many, many countries...some of it not deserved, but some of it deserved. Propping up cruel dictators, choosing sides in foreign conflicts that were quite frankly - sometimes none of America's business, etc.
And that eventually, that anger would manifest itself in direct attacks on U.S. soil...which it obviously did.

The bottom line is you cannot go around the world and (*)(*)(*)(*) off (rightly or wrongly) millions of people and not have it come back to haunt you one day.
That is just naive.

And I believe that is more or less what he meant.

 

Paul has basically said that the US is at least partially to blame for 9/11. I've heard him say it and no amount of explaining will help him walk back that kind of thinking. It's like saying somehow, someway, a woman is partially to blame for being raped cause she wore a short skirt and red lipstick.

 

The whole "blowback" theory is bull (*)(*)(*)(*).

First of all, lets discuss "history".

In 1990 Iraq invaded Kuwait in a massive blitzkrieg, which at that time would've put around 80% of the world's known oil reserves in the hands of a dictator.

The UN, the Arab league, the entire world requested that America intervene and remove Saddam Hussein.

Part of that effort, involved the KING and LEGAL SOVEREIGN of Saudi Arabia request our presence on his soil.

That is a legitimate action that Osama Bin laden and other terrorists should have **** and accepted.

After Saddam was removed, the world requested sanctions and a no fly zone in order to

A)Protect the Kurds

B)Weaken Saddam Hussein and force regime change.

Both were legal, world sanctioned activities that in no way deserved any kind of retaliatory response from any Muslim anywhere in the world. NONE.

So please explain to me what right did ANY MUSLIM ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD have to "blowback" on America?

No one else in the world was capable of removing Saddam Hussen from Kuwait except America.

That is History.

"Blowback" is a CODE WORD for "Blame America First"

As far as other "meddling" in the ME is concerned. The Saudi King is our Ally and the Saudis have been our allies for almost 100 years. Longer than Japan, Europe, or any of the others.

Please explain to me why we shouldn't meddle in order to assist them in their problems in the world that they can't solve for themselves considering how vitally important they are to our economy??

 

I like how you try to "debunk" Blowback by starting at 1990.....

 

Are you responsible for Foreign policy? Is your neighbor? How about your Aunt is she responsible? Or is it the people that act out that Policy? Do you get it yet?

Foreign policy does not equal the American People. Its a simple concept.

 

haha so true. He hasn't got a clue. Once he contested the statement I made that Brzezinski had funded radicals in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets. Clearly he still doesn't accept that history.

 

He was entirely correct.

No its more like pointing a gun in someone's face and crying when they do something violent to change things.

 

Like Ron Paul, the same regurgitate talking points offered up over and over

 

The irony is strong in this one.

 

Yea, I only posted video of Ron Paul in his own words saying America deserved 9/11

Wht kind of proof is that that the man actualy said it- right

No proof at all per the Paul supporters

 

No proof?? Please refer back to post 57 where I proved that he did not say we deserved 9/11 from the video that you had posted (that and your ridiculous claim that supporters of Paul feel the same way)

http://www.politicalforum.com/1060814720-post57.html

In case you don't feel like clicking, here is the text below...

Ron Paul...word for word....direct from your video. The same video you claim Ron Paul "dismisses the deaths" and "americans deserved it" Please kindly point out where you see those words...

 

Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself Paul did not blame America

Keep trying to spin that Paul did not blame America and say we deserved 9/11

and while you are at it, go to the beach and try to keep the tide back with a broom

 

That's it...keep denying the fact you were proven wrong...once again and keep spinning your lie. It's apparent from reading this and other threads that I'm not the only one that sees you are clearly wrong and continue to lie.

What I posted is fact. What you posted is your opinion. It's sad that you continue to ignore that.

 

And much to your dismay, my opinioin is shared by the vast majority of voters.

If you want to see how well Paul does in these primaries simply look at the candidate ending up in last place

It is usually Ron Paul

Case closed

 

Just because he didn't use those very words doesn't mean he didn't use other words that meant the same thing. In other words he blames the US for 9/11.

 

There's a big difference between blaming someone for something and saying that it was deserved.

So maybe you can answer the question for me since others refuse to. In your opinion, what was the cause of 9/11? Why did it happen?

 

Actually Paul did not say "America deserved 9/11". Repeating a lie does not make it the truth.