Why defend the school murderer?

Can anyone point out when a school shooter was defended by a group? Please do tell, because I can't for the life of me recall anyone defending any prior mass murderer of children until our Trans fellow. It is ASTOUNDING how many are actually justifying the death this person caused, complaining about dead naming it/they or misgendering?? WTF? Serious?

The first thing certain news organizations say is how the TRANS community is being attacked? WHAT??? And Madonna does a Trans benefit concert IN NASHVILLE??

Can anyone point out when someone did a WHITE MALE benefit concert? Seriously what is the matter with Leftists and this country?

 

When people of certain groups commit horrific crimes then no matter what nothing can be said that will put that group in a negative light. When people of an unfavorable group commit horrific crimes, the left, and it’s always the left, try to blame the entire group and paint that entire group as having the same thoughts as the person who committed the crime.

 

nothing will surprise me. the shooter was a member of an officially sanctioned victim class, so any little white kids that may have been damaged are just business as usual and they probably deserved it. the precedents have already been engraved in stone. can anyone forget "hands up, don't shoot"? how about the origins of blm, trayvon martin. a violent young man who met a violent end, but they could label his executioner "white" (in any other case he would have been an hispanic "victim") and hound the poor stupid sob into oblivion. victimhood is now power.

 

Yes, women were once victims. But now they’re no longer victims because the people victimizing them are in a more popular class of victimhood.

 

Any defense of these tragedies can be turned around like this: Their concerns about the 2A, gun nuts, etc is a bunch of crap. Because if it truly meant something to them, they would be consistent. It's not a 'double standard', it's inconsistency.

 

They would rather defend the school shooter because he belongs to a special victims class then they would actually have any sympathy for the victims

 

Cute....and a deliberate mischaracterisation of the debate. There are plenty here who are saying that there would be no school shooters if there were no kid killing machines available to the shooter.

 

Yes because if there were no guns no one would magically be able to kill anyone anymore...

Remind us what someone in a club with a gallon of gasoline was able to do.

 

Did Biden or Harris fly to comfort the families? Did he mention the hatred displayed towards his own religion?

 

Gee whiz, do you really need me to explain it...or 'remind' you.

Let me know when the next kid killer does his mischief with a 'gallon of gasoline' at a school. Why bother with that anyway......just mow them down on parade with your car, Fatback. That'd be okay, yes?

 

More kids die on liberal street corner drive by shootings than in schools. Is there anything you’d like to say about that and the people who would shoot them?,

 

Why does age matter? And why isn’t the left trying to ban ‘a gallon of gas?’ Oh, wait, they are. Sorry.

 

what took you so long? i expected one of the usual suspects to chime in with their "blame the tool, not the sicko" nonsense long before now.

 

(I'll resist the challenge that you prove that.)

Sure, they would not die by gun shot on any street corner if there were no guns to make them die. Next?

 

perhaps for your next trick you can institute world peace and tell us all who the shooter was on the grassy knoll.

 

I agree. Now what is your plan to get rid of guns? Keep in mind, unlike you, we have borders that anyone and anything can walk through.

 

I have no 'bullet proof' magic wand solution, but you cannot go far wrong if you at least try the Australian model.

Yeas, I know...the 2nd Amendment stands in the way.

So, if you are fair dinkum......out it goes in its current form which is ridiculous. Might have had some relevance back then, but it is just a joke now. No well armed militia is ever going to overcome the US military machine, ever. The only way a Government over there will be unseated by a gun (coup) is if that gun is from the Military itself. You best just hope and pray that those in the Military there never go rogue as they have in other parts of the Planet.

 

Wow, I'm sure glad I live in America where we actually CARE about freedom. I read about the confinement Australia has instituted for getting COVID. SIEG HEIL!

 

sorry, i'm not into sweets.

the only thing silly here is your insistence that guns are somehow responsible for violence. i recognize quite well what is going on in my country and i realize that the cause lies in simple-minded sentiments like yours. this is a matter of ethics, not hardware, and the first step in solving the problem is to quit blaming the easy scapegoats.

 

Okay, I'll keep my toffee apple.

What are you going to do about ending this slaughter of your kids? Post cliches about knolls?

 

You do realize that with hundreds of millions of guns out there there’s no way you’ll get them all and criminals will keep theirs and realize the people who follow the law are now easy targets.

Let me ask you and other libs a fair question: if someone walked into a school and killed 10 kids with fentanyl that came from Mexico, how would you propose to stop it? Keep in mind that no lib wants to talk about the 100k drug deaths we have every year, just guns. Look at England, they banned guns so people committed murders with knives. Then they went after knives.

 

Slaughter of kids? Its aberrational mass shootings... by a few crazy people... its a series of crimes that must be addressed as crimes. We need to find the crazies before they attack again. There are many reason children die. We must address them all.

 

Yeas I do know that, and we did know that Down Here when Howard legislated to get rid of the guns. We had a go. "You?"

Well, true, but it ain't fentanyl killing kids in schools. Neither is it gallon cans of gasoline, or cars, or any other bloody thing....just......machines designed to kill en masse.

 

Yeas...slaughter of kids.

Sure...go find the 'crazies.' How's that working out so far?

Why not just take away their machines designed to kill en masse ....... from everyone? Will the Sun not come up tomorrow if that happens overnight? What will change in your day to day life? Will 'you' feel personally violated if you had to hand over your machine specifically designed to kill en masse, or do you have it for some other sinister reason?

 

Machines designed to kill "en masse"??? How did nuclear weapons, chemical agents and weaponized anthrax get in the conversation???