Why do liberals think its so terrible to live in a white country?

No it's not. A mutation in a single individual with recessive genes would have been lost almost immediately.

 

sorry, but the science says otherwise.

dont be offended

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/15/AR2005121501728.html

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

https://www.livescience.com/42838-european-hunter-gatherer-genome-sequenced.html

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/heres-how-europeans-quickly-evolved-lighter-skin-180954874/

http://www.ancient-origins.net/news...eloped-europe-only-recently-8000-years-020287

 

One theory by one Jewish scientist says that, not science in general. Neanderthals had light skin and straight hair, that's where whites got it from. Blacks have no Neanderthal DNA, so they lack these traits.

 

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-...eanderthal-genes-live-on-in-our-hair-and-skin

http://www.dhamurian.org.au/anthropology/neanderthal1.html

https://www.newscientist.com/articl...l-human-sex-bred-light-skins-and-infertility/

 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...s-genetics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/

 

so you're going to discount all the other studies too?

 

One of the genes, BNC2, is involved in skin pigmentation. That implies that Eurasians owe their paler skins partly to Neanderthals.

 

For example, the Neanderthal version of the skin gene POU2F3 is found in around 66 percent of East Asians, while the Neanderthal version of BNC2, which affects skin color, among other traits, is found in 70 percent of Europeans.

proves that Asians are not white.

and also, Neanderthal genes made Europeans more disease prone:

Sankararaman also found Neanderthal variants in genes that affect the risk of several diseases, including lupus, biliary cirrhosis, Crohn's disease, and type 2 diabetes.

 

Don't worry. You won't be alive to see it.

 

Almost all of the studies with this theory are based on his work.

 

Neanderthals had lighter skin and the humans that mixed with them have lighter skin. It's not a coincidence.

 

I didn't claim Asians were white, I said they had the same skin color, and in many cases, they do. Doesn't really matter which gene is responsible for it, the color is the same, which makes me question why you try and lump Asians into your "People of color" group that you wish to take ownership of.

So what? All races are more likely to have certain diseases. Sickle cell anemia is almost exclusive to blacks, and is rare in other races. Ashkenazi Jews are at risk for certain diseases that are extremely rare in other groups.

 

I'm seeing it right now.

Since you're so worried about your weight, why don't you worry about your own mortality instead of mine? I'm probably half your age. Or is this more projection on your part?

 

bullshit, baseless bullshit

they did their own genetic research

 

because Asians are not white. Is this fact problematic for you?

are you Asian?

 

False.

 

I didn't say they were white, I said they had the same colored skin in many cases. You seem to be having more reading comprehension problems today than usual.

 

you won't even attempt to prove all their research comes from one guy, as you know its false.

they all did independent genetics studies

 

Persons of Color are all non-whites.

 

(((David Reich))) is literally the one who came up with this hypothesis, and every source you've produced so far has adopted his study.

 

Which you base on absolutely nothing.

 

per·son of col·or
noun
plural noun: people of color

1. a person who is not white or of European parentage.

 

The term "person of color" (plural: people of color, persons of color; sometimes abbreviated POC)[1]is used primarily in the United States to describe any person who is not white. The term encompasses all non-white peoples, emphasizing common experiences of systemic racism

 

and countless independent genetic studies have shown that the hypothesis to be true