Why Do People Want to Lock Her Up?

It doesn't, what is does do is expose the actual TDS'ers on this forum as there isn't anything in this thread about Trump, showing just how much Trump lives in your head rent free every day. Pretty sad dude. Maybe you should get a room with Trump since you can't seem to have a conversation without him.

 

Maybe you should get a room with Trump since you can't seem to have a conversation without him. In case you haven't heard, this thread is about Clinton crimes. Maybe you should go somewhere else so you can have your TDS fits where its actually about Trump instead of trying to hijack a thread for more crying Liberals over a lost election.

 

I would say.....
All of the above, plus quite a few not on the list.

 

You see the uneducated don’t bother to learn the story. For starters she didn’t want to take the case but had to. And what she was laughing at was the findings of a lie detector test because she thought they were silly.
Commonsense would tell one that she would never want to support a sexual offender but they hear that on fox and don’t bother to check it
Here educate yourself https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

 

What crimes?your list is ridiculous...Use common sense. The right wing hates her so much and has investigated her nonstop and comes up with nothing. But the right wing doesn’t want to investigate a man who has already chosen over 89 people who have been indicted and Minnie going to prison. Hillary is not president so grow up

 

Then lock up Ivanka,!
If it was a clear felony you can be sure she would be locked up. Or do you think the Republicans who hate her so much are just giving her a free pass after investigation and investigation and investigation. What she did was stupid and there was nothing damaging at all. They tried desperately to lock her up but they couldn’t but obviously you know much more LOL

 

Shhhh, they rather believe that this woman who didn’t want to take the case and was a feminist was laughing at the victim. No wonder Trump loves his base

 

Just wow. You believe 89 people selected by Trump have been indicted? Why are you on these threads as you are severally misinformed or knowingly lying.

 

No kidding.

Do you mean that Hillary hasn't gotten The Chair, yet?

The RW's obsession with Hillary has gone long past just being "comical".

"Lock Her Up"?

 

If you knew me 100% (that is everything that is me for good and for bad), you'd probably be able to make a long list of misdeeds though admittedly of less consequence than Clinton. A Drumpf list of misdeeds would be very easy to compile and I'm sure somebody out there on the Internet has done so.

The point I'm making here is compiling a list is just silly.

And as for the 'all of the above' response: why lock Hillary Clinton up for an affair on the part of her husband? Seriously? Blame the betrayed spouse?

Let's try the same exercise with Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Romney, McCain, Kerry, Sanders, Pence, Gore, Cheney, Biden and many many more.

 

Check it out. I am not talking just about the Russian investigation I am talking about all the people who have been breaking the laws. Why don’t you Google and learn something. How many indictments did Obama have how many pled guilty under Obama? How many were sent to prison under Obama? Zero and yes you stand up for a man who is the worlds worst judge of character or just a criminal

 

Which has nothing to do with the original question (As per usual) Who are these 89 people indicted excluding Russians. You said you found it on Google. Wheres the link to these 89 Trump hired indicted individuals? Or is this nothing more than TDS?

 

Yet here you are talking about Trump on a thread that has nothing to do with him. Another quick note, we are TDS'ing over Clinton. Lol Do you even know what the term means. laughable

 

where you been, 'lock her up' was all about Trump, trying to act like you did not know the "lock her up" was a Trump campaign slogan.. seriously?

it's ironic that his daughter did the same thing using personal email - lol

 

Come on, the original list is ridiculous, Even the most fervent Trump supporters cannot possibly believe that it would be okay to lock someone up because the disgraced husband of a campaign member exposed his junk to women on facebook. If you actually had stuck to REAL potential Clinton crimes that would warrant jail time, your OP could have been taken more seriously. The list that is posted is noting more than RW Clinton hate.

 

The only reason this thread even exists is because of the continuing Clinton obsession by the AM right wing talk radio right, which has been bombarded with this noise almost daily for 25 straight years.

These clowns need new material.

Neither Barack Obama, nor Hillary Clinton has been a candidate for any public office for over two years.

But you wouldn't know that if you turned on Levin, Lush Limpballs, or Sham Hammity!

 

You must mix me up with another poster. I did not post about 89 individuals Trump hired that are indicted. It is funny, though, that you accuse this other poster of TDS because of a bogus list of individuals indicted, when your list of supposed "prison" offenses committed by Hillary is as bogus.

But, back to my previous question: Why would it be okay to lock someone up because the disgraced husband of a campaign member exposed his junk to women on facebook?

 

Trump may be a liar, but he hasn't committed nearly as many crimes as Hillary has gotten away with.

 

You may not have posted it but thats the post you responded to.

I posted: Which has nothing to do with the original question (As per usual) Who are these 89 people indicted excluding Russians. You said you found it on Google. Wheres the link to these 89 Trump hired indicted individuals? Or is this nothing more than TDS?
You quoted it in your post stating: Come on, the original list is ridiculous, Even the most fervent Trump supporters cannot possibly believe that it would be okay to lock someone up because the disgraced husband of a campaign member exposed his junk to women on facebook. If you actually had stuck to REAL potential Clinton crimes that would warrant jail time, your OP could have been taken more seriously. The list that is posted is noting more than RW Clinton hate.

Now on to your question: Why would it be okay to lock someone up because the disgraced husband of a campaign member exposed his junk to women on facebook?
Answer: It isn't. Why are you asking such a question?

 

I am asking the question because Anthony Weiner is on your original "Why do people want to lock her up" list. Care to explain?

Maybe you should be more careful in posting lists of things to lock a person up when you don't even agree with items on that list.

 

Just curious. If trump did any of those sorts of things, would you want to lock HIM up?

 

lock her up... lock her up... lock her up

 

Ivanka?

 

come on Fresh air... it's catchy... da da da... lock her ta... you can do it