Why the Drug War Can't Be Won

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

The money is so good that even federal officials are selling drugs and an altered state of being is so preferable that state and local LOEs and officials are being arrested for drugs.

CORRUPT FEDERAL OFFICER PLEADS GUILTY TO SMUGGLING GUNS AND DRUG MONEY THROUGH THE AIRPORT

http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/press/2011/03-17b-11.html

Former Officer and Wife Also Plead Guilty to Marriage Fraud Scheme

ATLANTA, GA - DEVON SAMUELS, 45, and KEISHA JONES, 30, both of Stockbridge, Georgia, pleaded guilty today in federal district court. SAMUELS pleaded guilty to conspiring to launder drug money and attempting to smuggle guns onto an airplane. In a separate case, SAMUELS and JONES pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit marriage fraud.

United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates said, Our citizens expect the federal government and its agents to protect the borders, and not use their badges as a personal gateways for getting cash. In this case, a federal customs officer smuggled guns and drug money for people he thought were international narcotics traffickers. At about the same time, he and his wife were running a corrupt marriage business on the side. Such officers can expect to see federal prison.

According to United States Attorney Yates, the charges and other information presented in court: SAMUELS, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer, was charged in connection with three undercover sting operations with smuggling drug money and guns through Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport.

On November 3, 2010, an undercover officer, posing as a drug money launderer, gave SAMUELS approximately $25,000 in money represented to be from the sale of drugs. With the assistance of others, and by unlawfully using his badge to bypass security and avoid screening, SAMUELS smuggled the money through Atlanta's airport to Jamaica. Once in Jamaica, SAMUELS delivered the money to a Jamaican undercover police officer who was posing as an international drug trafficker.

On November 19, 2010, SAMUELS accepted over $50,000 in purported drug money from another undercover officer. SAMUELS then traveled from Atlanta to Jamaica, where SAMUELS delivered the money to Jamaican undercover police officers. While in Atlanta's airport, SAMUELS again unlawfully used his badge to bypass security and avoid being screened.

Finally, on November 30, 2010, SAMUELS accepted five firearms and approximately $20,000 in alleged drug money from an undercover police officer. SAMUELS smuggled the firearms and money into the airport by using his badge to bypass security. Once inside the airport, SAMUELS gave the firearms and money to a second undercover officer who had told SAMUELS that she was going to transport the firearms and money to Arizona for a meeting with members of a Mexican drug cartel.

Ex-prosecutor gets prison deal in Vegas drug case

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/11/07/3086693/ex-prosecutor-gets-prison-deal.html

LAS VEGAS -- A former prosecutor-turned-fugitive who once handled the high-profile Las Vegas drug cases of celebrities Paris Hilton and Bruno Mars was sentenced Wednesday to a reduced term of 12 to 30 months in state prison term following his return from Mexico.

David Schubert, 49, fled there to avoid jail after pleading guilty in a crack cocaine possession case. In court Wednesday, he didn't apologize as he stood for sentencing before Clark County District Court Judge Carolyn Ellsworth, defense attorney Louis Schneider said.

"He feels as if he shouldn't have even been there," Schneider said later.

Instead, Schubert told the judge he felt he'd been treated exceptionally harshly for his March 2011 arrest with $40 in rock cocaine and an unregistered handgun in his car.

Ellsworth revoked a sentence that she imposed in February that would have Schubert serve nine months in county jail as a requirement of probation. But she also cut his prison term from a possible 16 to 40 months, gave Schubert 40 days credit for time served and ordered him enrolled in a prison substance abuse program.

Schneider said Schubert was grateful for the reduced sentence and opportunity for treatment and said he hopes to resume practicing law in the future. Schubert's law license was suspended by the state Supreme Court just before he fled to Mexico on Sept. 21. He was arrested at the border Sept. 30 while re-entering the U.S. after spending time in the Mexican coastal resort towns of Rosarito Beach and Ensenada.

Thom Gover, the deputy Nevada state attorney general who prosecuted the case, called Schubert's revised sentence appropriate.

"If the interest of justice and rehabilitation is the goal, one to 2 1/2 years is enough," Gover said.

The sentence was first reported Wednesday by the Las Vegas Review-Journal ( http://bit.ly/VEiAxh).

Schubert resigned from the Clark County district attorney's office after his March 2011 arrest and pleaded guilty in September 2011 to felony unlawful possession of a controlled substance. Felony conspiracy, weapon and drug use charges were dropped under a plea deal that avoided trial.

Schubert expected mandatory probation and a chance to wipe the felony conviction from his record. But Ellsworth rejected the plea deal in February, berating Schubert as "a disgrace to his oath as a prosecutor and a lawyer" and declaring that Schubert wouldn't get special treatment.

The XL · Nov 15, 2012

The war on drugs might be the most vile, evil thing in this country's history outside of slavery. It's racist, it's anti freedom, it props up violent gangs, and it puts innocents behind bars while funding a bunch of special interests. Disgusting.

The Real American Thinker · Nov 15, 2012

What I love is the Drug War supporters like SaintMike, who say things like "history doesn't lie."

They're right, it doesn't. You know what History taught us? Prohibition don't work, playas.

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

From George Will at NYP:

Amelioration of today’s drug problem requires Americans to understand the significance of the 80/20 ratio. Twenty percent of American drinkers consume 80 percent of the alcohol sold here. The same 80-20 split obtains among users of illicit drugs.

About 3 million people — less than 1 percent of America’s population — consume 80 percent of illegal hard drugs. Drug-trafficking organizations can be most efficiently injured by changing the behavior of the 20 percent of heavy users, and we are learning how to do so. Reducing consumption by casual users will not substantially reduce the northward flow of drugs or the southward flow of money.

Americans’ experience with marketing’s power inclines them to favor prohibition and enforcement over legalization and marketing of drugs. But this choice has consequences: More Americans are imprisoned for drug offenses or drug-related probation and parole violations than for property crimes.

And although America spends five times more jailing drug dealers than it did 30 years ago, the prices of cocaine and heroin are 80 percent to 90 percent lower than 30 years ago.

In “Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know,” policy analysts Mark Kleiman, Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken argue that imprisoning low-ranking, street-corner dealers is pointless: A $200 transaction can cost society $100,000 for a three-year sentence.

And imprisoning large numbers of dealers produces an army of people who, emerging from prison with blighted employment prospects, can only deal drugs. Which is why, although a few years ago Washington, DC, dealers earned an average of $30 an hour, today they earn less than the federal minimum wage ($7.25).

Dealers, aka “pushers,” have almost nothing to do with initiating drug use by future addicts; almost every user starts when given drugs by a friend, sibling or acquaintance. There is a staggering disparity between the trivial sums earned by dealers who connect the cartels to the cartels’ customers, and the huge sums spent trying to slow the flow of drugs to those street-level dealers.

Kleiman et al say that in developed nations, cocaine sells for about $3,000 per ounce — almost twice the price of gold. And the supply of cocaine, unlike that of gold, can be cheaply and quickly expanded. But in the countries where cocaine and heroin are produced, they sell for about 1 percent of their US retail price.

If cocaine were legalized, a $2,000 kilogram could be FedExed from Colombia for less than $50 and sold profitably in America for a small markup from its price in Colombia, and a $5 rock of crack might cost 25 cents. Criminalization drives the cost of the smuggled kilogram in America up to $20,000. But then it retails for more than $100,000.

People used to believe enforcement could raise prices but doubted that higher prices would decrease consumption. Now they know consumption declines as prices rise but wonder whether enforcement can substantially affect prices.

They urge rethinking the drug-control triad of enforcement, prevention and treatment because we have been much too optimistic about all three.

Cartels have oceans of money for corrupting enforcement because drugs are so cheap to produce and easy to renew. So it is not unreasonable to consider modifying a policy that gives hundreds of billions of dollars a year to violent organized crime.

Marijuana probably provides less than 25 percent of the cartels’ revenues. Legalizing it would take perhaps $10 billion from some bad and violent people, but the cartels would still make much more money from cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines.

Sixteen states have legalized “medical marijuana.” In 1990, 24 percent of Americans supported full legalization. Today, 50 percent do. In 2010, in California, where one-eighth of Americans live, 46 percent of voters supported legalization, and some opponents were marijuana growers who like the profits from prohibition.

Would the public-health problems resulting from legalization be a price worth paying for injuring the cartels and reducing the costs of enforcement? We probably are going to find out.

georgewill@washpost.com
Click to expand...

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

Another good piece

We've heard a lot about the terrible death toll Mexico has suffered during the drug war — over 11,000 souls so far. This helps to account for the startling lack of controversy that greeted last week's news that Mexico had suddenly decriminalized drugs — not just marijuana but also cocaine, LSD, and heroin. In place of the outrage and threats that U.S. officials expressed when Mexico tried to decriminalize in 2006 was a mild statement, from our new drug czar, that we are going to take a "wait and see" approach.

Still, we've heard nothing about the American death toll. Isn't that strange? So far as I can tell, nobody has even tried to come up with a number.

Until now. I've done some rough math, and this is what I found:

6,487.

To repeat, that's 6,487 dead Americans. Throw in overdoses and the cost of this country's paralyzing drug laws is closer to 15,000 lives.

I'm basing these numbers on an interview with a high-ranking former narcotics officer named Neill Franklin. A member of the Maryland State Police for 32 years, Franklin eventually rose to the position of commander in Maryland's Bureau of Drug Enforcement. As he puts it, he was a classic "good soldier" in the drug war.

Franklin's turning point came in October of 2000. "I lost a very, very close friend of mine, a narcotics agent for Maryland State Police," he says. "His name was Ed Toatley. He was assassinated outside of Washington, D.C., trying to make a drug deal in a park. He had a wife, he had three kids. I had just spoken to him a couple of weeks prior to him getting assigned to this particular deal — he was finally going to bring this guy down, and lo and behold the guy kills him."

That got Franklin thinking. "I started doing the research and asking the questions: What progress are we making on this thing? And it turns out that not only are we losing kids who are in the game, but we are losing communities and fellow cops. We had lost a number of police officers in Baltimore alone."

Another turning point was 2002, when Angela Dawson and her five kids were murdered in East Baltimore by drug dealers she had been tying to keep from doing business in front of her house. "They fire-bombed the house late one night and the whole family perished," Franklin remembers.

So he started brooding on the drug war's body count. "Baltimore is a city of just a hair over 600,000 people. Our annual homicide rate was fluctuating between 240 and 300 every year for decades. Think about that: 240 to 300 homicides annually, and 75 percent to 80 percent are drug related. It's either gangs that are using drugs to support operations, or territorial disputes among drug dealers, or people just getting caught in the line of fire. And Baltimore is a small city compared to others," Franklin notes. "So we're not talking a handful of homicides; we're talking about the majority of the homicides in any city in the U.S. So if you add those cities up — just lowball it, take just 50 percent — I guarantee you, you'll find the numbers are quite similar to what they have in Mexico."

I took his advice. In 2007, the last year for which hard numbers are available, 16,425 people were murdered. Since our most recent Census said that 79 percent of the country is urban, I cut out the rural Americans — although there's plenty of drug use there, too — and came up with 12,975 urban homicides. Low-balling that number at 50 percent, I arrived at a rough estimate of 6,487 drug deaths. Using 75 percent, the toll rises to 9,731.

"And now we've got the cartel gangs coming up from Mexico," Franklin reminds me. "They're in over 130 cities in the U.S. already, and it's not going to get better."

Why Regulating Legal Drugs Fixes the Dead-Body Problem

Neill Franklin's solution is radical: "You have to take the money out of it. Many people talk about legalization and decriminalize — it's still illegal, but you're just not sending as many people to jail, especially for the nonviolent offenses. However, the money is still being made in the illegal sales, so you still have the drug wars. It's prohibition that's killing our people. That's why people are dying."

"So," I ask, "you want to legalize everything?"

"Yes. But I like to put it like this: I want regulation of everything. Because right now, I think they're confusing prohibition with regulation. What I'm talking about is applying standards — quality control, just like alcohol. We should have learned our lesson during alcohol prohibitions — we repealed the Eighteenth Amendment and applied standards of sale and manufacture, so it has to be a certain quality and you can't sell it to just anybody, and you still go to jail if you sell it to the wrong people. So, among other things, you'll also reduce overdoses — the majority of the overdoses we have is people who don't know what they're getting or buying because the purity level fluctuates. In addition, people are afraid to get help because they don't want to go jail, so they let their friends die."

So let's add overdoses to our death toll. In 2005, recent Senate testimony shows, 22,400 Americans died of drug overdoses. Leaving aside prescription drugs and counting only the 39 percent of overdoses attributed to cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamines, I count another 8,736 deaths.

That brings us to 15,223 Americans dead from the drug war.

But what about the argument that drugs will spread like wildfire if we don't keep bringing down the hammer?

"First, there's no concrete study to support such a belief — it's all completely speculation," Franklin insists. "So in my left hand I have all this speculation about what may happen to addiction rates, and then I look at my other hand and I see all these dead bodies that are actually fact, not speculation. And you're going to ask me to weigh the two? Second, if the addiction rate does go up, I'm going to have a lot of live addicts that I can cure. The direction we're going in now, I've got a lot of dead bodies."

I told Franklin I was surprised to hear a cop express so much sympathy for drug addicts. Even pro-drug types don't do that much. "I do have sympathy," he says. "What they're dealing with is a health issue, not a criminal issue. And as long as you treat it as a criminal issue, we're treating the symptom and not the cause."

Why Cleaning Up the Justice System Solves the Wasted-Money Problem

Last year, Franklin went public with his conclusions by joining a group called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. Since then he's made it his business to talk to other cops about the subject, and he's been surprised by another discovery: "I find that 95 percent of my law-enforcement friends agree that we have to take a different direction, but they're not sure what direction that is — and probably 60 percent to 65 percent agree that we should legalize."

And why, exactly, don't we hear about a possibly overwhelming majority of police wanting to legalize — not just decriminalize, but legalize — major narcotics?

"Selfish reasons," he says. "There is a lot of money to be made in law enforcement. If we were to legalize, you could get rid of one third of every law-enforcement agency in this country."

Really? One third?

"And give back all the federal funds too. That's why very seldom will you see a police chief step forward and say, 'Yeah, we need to do this.'"

I made a stab at crunching those numbers, too. In 2003, America's local police budgets (PDF) were $43 billion dollars. A third of that: $12.9 billion. Add another $9 billion in domestic and international law enforcement (PDF) and the number rises to $21.9 billion.

Then consider America's prisons, the problems with which we've discussed here time and again. "The prison population is off the hook in this country," Franklin says. "In 1993, at the height of apartheid in South Africa, the incarceration of black males was 870 per 100,000. In 2004 in the U.S., for every 100,000 people we are sending 4,919 black males to prison. And the majority of those are for nonviolent drug offenses. But we'd rather send people to prison than give them information and treatment."

So... our federal prison budget in 2007 was $6.3 billion, and 55 percent of the prisoners were there for drug offenses. The total state-prison budget for the U.S. in 2007 was $49 billion, according to this study from the Pew Foundation, which found that "at least" 44 states had gone into the red to incarcerate their citizens. Using the same 55 percent number — which is probably low — we arrive at a rough total of the prison expenses associated with the drug war: $30.4 billion.

"I know jails are a big business and keep lot of people employed," Franklin says, "but it doesn't make it right."

To review, using what seem to be very conservative numbers, our first unofficial tally of the drug war in the United States is staggering:

15,223 dead and $52.3 billion spent each year — which is, incidentally, almost enough to pay for universal health care.

"We've got serious constitutional issues involved, too," Franklin adds. "Improper search and seizure is occurring every day..."

But I'll save that for another column.

Read more: Drug War Facts - Statistics if Drugs Were Legal - Esquire http://www.esquire.com/the-side/richardson-report/drug-war-facts-090109#ixzz2CKgBGlC5
Click to expand...

The XL · Nov 15, 2012

The Real American Thinker said: ↑

What I love is the Drug War supporters like SaintMike, who say things like "history doesn't lie."

They're right, it doesn't. You know what History taught us? Prohibition don't work, playas.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

No real man of any righteous God could support one of the most evil things in history, the war on drugs.

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

The XL said: ↑

Exactly.

No real man of any righteous God could support one of the most evil things in history, the war on drugs.
Click to expand...

People addicted to drugs are sick, they deserve healing, not cruelty. Being placed in a correctional facility filled with pedophiles, rapists, murderers, etc is not just for a non-violent offense.

peoplevsmedia · Nov 15, 2012

Zosiasmom said: ↑

Why the Drug War Can't Be Won:
CORRUPT FEDERAL OFFICER PLEADS GUILTY TO SMUGGLING GUNS AND DRUG MONEY THROUGH THE AIRPORT
Click to expand...

And yet, the filth call it inhumane to hang these types of swine, while people fighting for their own country in the middle east are tortured. world is a sick place.

The Real American Thinker · Nov 15, 2012

Zosiasmom said: ↑

People addicted to drugs are sick, they deserve healing, not cruelty. Being placed in a correctional facility filled with pedophiles, rapists, murderers, etc is not just for a non-violent offense.
Click to expand...

Since when was our "justice system" actually just?

SpaceCricket79 · Nov 15, 2012

You could make the same argument about child porn - some drugs have no place in America. Weed is fine, but the ultra-libertarians who think that a crack or heroin stand should be allowed outside a middle school under "the 1st Amendment" - that's just nuts.

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

Another reason why the drug war cannot be won using the punitive approach is similar to why teenage abstinence is difficult to maintain despite the fears of pregnancy or disease...it feels good enough to take the risk.

People like doing drugs. It feels better to people than not doing drugs. I'd ask the social drinkers who are pro-drug prohibition why they drink but they will refuse to answer, most-likely.

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

SpaceCricket79 said: ↑

You could make the same argument about child porn - some drugs have no place in America.
Click to expand...

Or alcohol....

SpaceCricket79 · Nov 15, 2012

Zosiasmom said: ↑

Or alcohol....
Click to expand...

Well I'd support banning alcohol before I'd support legalizing PCP and meth.

Plus alcohol is not extremely addictive and does not cause violent or psychotic behavior in most of its users. Some people do become deadly addicted, but not the average drinker. I've found smoking much more addictive than drinking.

The XL · Nov 15, 2012

Zosiasmom said: ↑

Or alcohol....
Click to expand...

The same (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bags that prosecute non violent drug use go home, have a smoke, and wash it down with some alcohol. It infuriates me to no end.

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

SpaceCricket79 said: ↑

Well I'd support banning alcohol before I'd support legalizing PCP and meth.
Click to expand...

Has banning PCP and Meth stopped people from using it? Yes or no. Be honest, yes or no?

Plus alcohol is not extremely addictive and does not cause violent or psychotic behavior in most of its users. Some people do become deadly addicted, but not the average drinker. I've found smoking much more addictive than drinking.
Click to expand...

Not true, go to SAHMSA.gov. It is the most lethal drug in America and more people commit violent crimes on alcohol than any other drug due to its depressant characteristics. The human brain for those with a particular DNA also metabolizes alcohol differently and some people's reactions to the drug is quite intense.

kenrichaed · Nov 15, 2012

Zosiasmom said: ↑

People addicted to drugs are sick, they deserve healing, not cruelty. Being placed in a correctional facility filled with pedophiles, rapists, murderers, etc is not just for a non-violent offense.
Click to expand...

Many people in prison are there for things they did while on drugs such as rape, murder, theft etc not just simple possession.

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

kenrichaed said: ↑

Many people in prison are there for things they did while on drugs such as rape, murder, theft etc not just simple possession.
Click to expand...

Really? Cite me some specifics. This is what I do daily, so please enlighten me....

The XL · Nov 15, 2012

SpaceCricket79 said: ↑

Well I'd support banning alcohol before I'd support legalizing PCP and meth.

Plus alcohol is not extremely addictive and does not cause violent or psychotic behavior in most of its users. Some people do become deadly addicted, but not the average drinker. I've found smoking much more addictive than drinking.
Click to expand...

You're kidding, right?

NetworkCitizen · Nov 15, 2012

I can win the drug war. Give me all of your drugs and I will dispose of them.

kenrichaed · Nov 15, 2012

Zosiasmom said: ↑

Really? Cite me some specifics. This is what I do daily, so please enlighten me....
Click to expand...

Are you actually denying this?

I give up, your right, everyone in prison committed their crimes while they were sober lol.

YOU WIN

Serfin' USA · Nov 15, 2012

SpaceCricket79 said: ↑

Well I'd support banning alcohol before I'd support legalizing PCP and meth.

Plus alcohol is not extremely addictive and does not cause violent or psychotic behavior in most of its users. Some people do become deadly addicted, but not the average drinker. I've found smoking much more addictive than drinking.
Click to expand...

It doesn't even necessarily require legalization for the hard stuff. You can decriminalize all drugs and see a massive reduction in drug-related crimes.

It's worked really well for Portugal.

Blackrook · Nov 15, 2012

I've got a better idea. People should just stop taking drugs.

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

kenrichaed said: ↑

Are you actually denying this?

I give up, your right, everyone in prison committed their crimes while they were sober lol.

YOU WIN
Click to expand...

So you don't have specifics? Do you want the specifics on domestic violence and alcohol?

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291530-0277

Domestic violence is a significant and preventable cause of injury to women. The majority of cases involve violence perpetrated by a male partner, and heavy drinking has also been implicated as a risk factor.

A study in the December 2004 issue of Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research looks at alcohol consumption and perpetration of spousal abuse by male U.S. Army soldiers. Findings indicate that soldiers who drink heavily are more likely to abuse their spouses both when they are and when they are not drinking alcohol; heavy drinking is also associated with subsequent episodes of spouse abuse even when drinking habits are measured years prior to the event.

"Women are not only more likely than men to be victims of abuse at some point in their lifetime, but women are also more likely to sustain serious injury than are male victims of abuse," said Nicole S. Bell, first author of the study and a vice-president at Social Sectors Development Strategies, Incorporated. "However, it is important to note that married men and women are about equally likely to initiate physical abuse against each other. In fact, male victims of abuse may find it more difficult than female victims to come forward to report their experience due to social stigmatization or shame."

Bell added that heavy drinking is clearly a risk factor for intimate partner violence (IPV). "Men who drink heavily are more likely to abuse their partners both when they are drinking and when they are not drinking than men who are light drinkers. Put another way, women who live with heavy drinkers are more likely to be victims of intimate partner violence.
Click to expand...

http://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/binge-drinking.htm

http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/search/node/domestic%20violence

Zosiasmom · Nov 15, 2012

Blackrook said: ↑

I've got a better idea. People should just stop taking drugs.
Click to expand...

And drinking, right? Because alcohol is a depressant that can kill people when they withdraw from it (delerium tremens).

The XL · Nov 15, 2012

Blackrook said: ↑

I've got a better idea. People should just stop taking drugs.
Click to expand...

I've got an even better idea.

Mind your own (*)(*)(*)(*)ing business.

Log in or Sign up

Why the Drug War Can't Be Won

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

The Real American Thinker New Member

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

peoplevsmedia Banned

The Real American Thinker New Member

SpaceCricket79 New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

SpaceCricket79 New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

kenrichaed Banned

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

NetworkCitizen New Member

kenrichaed Banned

Serfin' USA Well-Known Member

Blackrook Banned

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Why the Drug War Can't Be Won

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

The Real American Thinker New Member

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

peoplevsmedia Banned

The Real American Thinker New Member

SpaceCricket79 New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

SpaceCricket79 New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

kenrichaed Banned

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

NetworkCitizen New Member

kenrichaed Banned

Serfin' USA Well-Known Member

Blackrook Banned

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

The XL Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches