Wikileaks: Mexican Drug Kingpin, El Chapo, Donated 15M to Clinton Foundation

Julian Assange launched an attack on the integrity of the Clinton Foundation with the latest intelligence report that says the organization had ties with Mexican drug cartel leader, Joaquín ‘El Chapo’ Guzmán.

Guzman, widely known as ‘El Chapo’, has an estimated net worth of $2 billion USD. He is currently incarcerated in a high-security Mexican prison and is in the process of being extradited to the United States.

Speaking at a conference over the weekend, the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks stated the report was “yet another blow to the questionable integrity of the Clinton Foundation.”

A report from intelligence officials found with “high confidence” that $320M Mexican Pesos (approximately $15M USD) was transferred from Guzman’s offshore shell assets in Saudi Arabia and Ukraine to Hillary Clinton’s private account in the Cayman Islands. This was then redirected to the Clinton Foundation.

http://times.com.mx/wikileaks-mexican-drug-kingpin-el-chapo-donated-15m-to-clinton-foundation/

And Liberals wanted these scumbags Clintons running our country. I certainly hope Sessions puts the lot in jail.

 

the rich liberals were enabling the drug crisis of the middle class by mexican drug cartels to distract them so they could steal their wealth with socialism, and give it to the poor.

if they believed a sacrifice should have been made, it should have came from the wealth of the rich to the middle class, then to the poor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart's_War

 

Hillary Clinton’s private account in the Cayman Islands


Wait... What??

 

Questioning Trump's credibility and wanting to put a career criminal like Hillary Rodham Clinton in the WH is the greatest lot of hypocrisy yet by the Democrats.

 

Any real evidence of this, or is it another example of 'fake news'?

- - - Updated - - -

Trump's tax dodging and robbing Americans of tax dollars. Wait...What?

 

There's no doubt in my mind that Guzman did find a way to put money into both the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton campaign.

This is exactly the sort of person that the Clintons, and Democrats, associate with - or rather take money from.

But as far as the figure of $15 million is concerned we're going to need to see some proof.

Leftists are going to cry fake news, like always, but this sort of revelation is in keeping with Clinton style so its highly likely to be true.

 

Document it.....

 

Sounds like more rightwing fake news. These people revel in it; that's how Donnie got elected, with a relentless drumbeat of fake news.

 

It goes all the way back to their scheme to raise money for her NY Senate position. The Clintons launder money like it's nobody's business. So sure, the 15 million number needs to be authenticated. But whether it ACTUALLY happened? We both agree, I leave no doubt. Her career suggests it as such.

"What difference does it make who fills my coffers!?"

 

Did he not admit to being 'smart' when questioned on his federal tax affairs? Perhaps you might ask Mr.Trump why he is the first president-elect in recent history to refuse to disclose his accounts? Oh, I'm sorry, they are being 'audited' for-how many years is it so far?

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/10/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?_r=0

 

Using the tax code in a legit manner is not dodging taxes.. Having an off shore account that is a tax shelter is...

So now that your derailing attempt is up in smoke so easily do you care to discuss the topic?

 

Hillary in bed with a drug cartel because she could make millions? Is anyone really surprised?
Hillary's charity skimmed Haitian relief money to pay for Chelsea's multi-million dollar wedding? Is anyone really surprised?
If she wasn't more ugly than 50 miles of bad road, she'd be on the street corner "soliciting" campaign donations.

Anything for money. She might even be the type of girl who can give someone a thrill by peeing on the bed. (but...I suspect it might not be intentional)

 

You are known by the company you keep. Thank heavens she is not the president to be.

 

Isn't it amazing how so much of the Left can believe sh!t like BuzzFeed, but anything from articles like places such as Wikileak (a fact provider) and it's fake news.

The Liberal media were the creators of fake news, and are still working to maximize it.

 

I asked for evidence. Your opinion and who you choose to believe; neither are evidence.

 

NO U fke newz.

Is that what politics has come to? Both sides constantly screaming "fake news!"?

 

It's like little children taunting each other in the play ground. I though Bush was bad but the furore over this Trump character has plumbed new depths of dumbing down; bedrock, in fact. America has firmly established herself as the comic strip character of the world, and the world is laughing at her stupidity.

 

Foreign media (as in media reporting on political events outside their country) have no real check on what they say. There is not a population with strongly held opinions already entrenched, there are not opposition media outlets which will hold them to account if they say things which are obviously not true.

Therefore, foreign media practically always takes the safe, internationalist perspective on these issues. The UK media had a lot of leave and remain newspapers (some disgraceful on both sides). The Australian media was (with the exception of fringe media) unilaterally on the remain side.

The US media had a huge bias toward Clinton, but at least there was a lot of opposition from a few media comglomerates in certain instances (WashPost did a great article post election on why the media got trapped in an echo chamber) and the people to keep them honest. Australian media was (with the exception of fringe media) unilaterally on the Clinton side. Media insiders gathered in a function room as the 2017 Presidential election results were coming in - if I recall correctly 88% of them supported Clinton, with a few percent supporting Stein and Johnson, and the pitiful remainder supporting Trump.

[hr][/hr]

In such an environment, it's difficult to have a contrary opinion. You have to break the ice wall which surrounds criticism of these popular notions before you can discuss them freely with people.

I suppose my point is that when you start pumping in a significantly biased perspective of any dispute, people will start to accept it irrespective of whether it is true. If they don't hear any opposing voices it becomes nothing but an echo chamber.

And you get surprised on June 23, 2016 and November 8, 2016.

 

The government has been using drugs to keep the blacks in the ghettos and dependent on government aid first with heroin and then with crack for decades now. One day soon the blacks will realize that the Democratic party is their worst enemy

 

Using existing tax law is most certainly not robbing. Do you take any deductions when you fill?

 

He's a Brit, we can't be sure if tax deductions actually exist in the British Tax code or not.

 

The clinton email investigation was fake news? I do not think so.

 

Nope. I'm retired. So, Mr. 'Man of the People', billionaire friend of the working class, has used tax loopholes unavailable to the low paid in order to enrich himself even further? If not illegal it is most certainly unethical.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/tax-loopholes-mainly-benefit-rich-1.aspx

 

The story is not true.

http://www.snopes.com/el-chapo-hillary-clinton-donation/

 

http://fortune.com/2012/10/10/jersey-the-richest-offshore-tax-shelter-of-them-all/

Oh they know all about not paying taxes.

- - - Updated - - -

What was a "loophole"?