Will you accept Supreme Court ruling on 14th Amendment??

Yuge insurrection, yuge I say...

 

Or, they will decide that the States CAN if they choose, ban trump.

 

Let us all know when that happens.

 

Accepting the ruling (depends on what it is) and liking it might be two different things.
Whatever it rules , will be rather definitive , and historical, given the situation now.

 

If they render a decision that follows the law and the constitution, of course we'll accept it.

 

I will abide by whatever decision they make. That's the Patriotic thing to do.

Unless of course if they base their decision on a Mickey Mouse cartoon or Pepper Pig. That would be hard to swallow.

 

Deleted

 

Yep. I have my opinion, and Trump has an advantage in the courts, but I'll go with what the SC rules. I do suspect, however, that they will try to avoid making a ruling given the chance.

 

They aren't Oracles. Their ruling only binds our conscience if they follow the Law and the Constitution.

 

They will base their decision on a thorough reading of the law.

Have no doubt.

 

When was the last time an elected official of the USA gov't engaged in an act that turned into a riot at the USA capitol to attempt the halt of a USA presidential election?

 

No guilt is needed. It's not a criminal action. It's a ballot eligibility action.

A guilty verdict, had it already happened would make the eligibility requirements almost a certainly.

 

This isn't the left. So far, only 2 states have decided to let the courts decide on eligibility. Several other states have ruled he's eligible. Even CA.

No need to paint with such a broad brush. There are 50 individual State elections.

...
Where Lawsuits Are Pending
Lawsuits seeking to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot are currently pending in 14 states, according to data compiled by Lawfare: Arizona, Alaska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Several of the challenges have been initiated by John Castro, a lesser-known Republican candidate vying for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. Two separate lawsuits have been filed in the state of New York—one from Castro in Manhattan court and another from Jerome Dewald, a Republican attorney.
https://www.newsweek.com/all-states-trying-kick-trump-off-ballot-where-cases-stand-1856331


...
Republicans are behind some of the push for disqualification.

 

Actually it's something written in section five of the amendment.

 

To be or not to be, interpreted by the courts.
The constitution and ammendments are guidelines. The courts determine gray areas.

 

the SC will vote in favor of Trump as it's a far right leaning court, it is what it is

 

We must honor and accept the judgement of the Supreme Court. Sometimes its decisions stink to high-heaven (the legality of "Obamacare" comes immediately to mind), and sometimes the SCOTUS saves the Constitution and all citizens (as with its consistent support for the 2nd Amendment). But, love some of the decisions, or hate them, the SCOTUS has the final and ultimate power when it comes to jurisprudential matters in this country.

 

They are also human , with their own political and religious leanings.

**Happy New year to you too.!!!

 

So you agree that the SCOTUS repeal of Roe was correct and you agree with it?

 

He very well may have agreed with the decision however…complying doesn’t equal agreeing. We all comply with laws/court decisions we don’t agree with.

 

On this forum, there were a lot of calls to stack the court after Roe was overturned. So the people who wanted that clearly didn't accept the ruling.

 

Republican stacked the court to get it overturned

 

Interesting. So you don't regard the Supreme Court or it's decisions as legitimate since it is, as you say, stacked?

 

The don't have to decide it. It's in the constitution in plain language.

"Fourteenth Amendment, Section 5:

The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

 

Please stop with the ludicrous arguments and actually read the constitution.

"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."


His privilege of running for president cannot be abridged without due process.