Thankfully a few people are finally trying to alert the masses to the dangers our growing population poses to us. I'm sure the 90% here who are conservatives will rail against this as eugenics, or genocide, but there is no bigger danger to humanity than our population which in many parts of the world is far to large to support already. Those who claim to support American prosperity with unsustainable endless growth should read this. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- With 7 billion on earth, a huge task before us By Jeffrey D. Sachs, Special to CNN (CNN) -- Just 12 years after the arrival of the 6 billionth individual on the planet in 1999, humanity will greet the 7 billionth arrival this month. The world population continues its rapid ascent, with roughly 75 million more births than deaths each year. The consequences of a world crowded with 7 billion people are enormous. And unless the world population stabilizes during the 21st century, the consequences for humanity could be grim. A rising population puts enormous pressures on a planet already plunging into environmental catastrophe. Providing food, clothing, shelter, and energy for 7 billion people is a task of startling complexity. The world's agricultural systems are already dangerously overstretched. Rainforests are being cut down to make way for new farms; groundwater used for irrigation is being depleted; greenhouse gases emitted from agricultural activities are a major factor in global climate change; fertilizers are poisoning estuaries; and countless species are threatened with extinction as we grab their land and water and destroy their habitats. The economic challenges are equally huge. Population is growing most rapidly in the world's poorest countries -- often the places with the most fragile ecological conditions. Poor people tend to have many more children, for several reasons. Many live on farms, where children can be engaged in farm chores. Poor societies generally suffer from high rates of child mortality, leading parents to have more children as "insurance" against the possible deaths of children. Girls rarely make it to high school, and are often married at a very young age, leading to early childbearing. And modern methods of contraception may be unavailable or unaffordable. Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey D. Sachs When poor families have six or eight children, many or most of them are virtually condemned to a lifetime of poverty. Too often, parents lack the wherewithal to provide decent nutrition, health care and education to most of them. Illiteracy and ill health end up being passed from generation to generation. Governments in poor countries are unable to keep up, their budgets overmatched by the need for new schools, roads and other infrastructure. So the arrival of the 7 billionth person is cause for profound global concern. It carries a challenge: What will it take to maintain a planet in which each person has a chance for a full, productive and prosperous life, and in which the planet's resources are sustained for future generations? How, in short, can we enjoy "sustainable development" on a very crowded planet? The answer has two parts, and each portends a difficult journey over several decades. The first part requires a change of technologies -- in farming, energy, industry, transport and building -- so that each of us on average is putting less environmental stress on the planet. We will have to make a worldwide transition, for example, from today's fossil-fuel era, dependent on coal, oil and gas, to an era powered by low-carbon energies such as the sun and wind. That will require an unprecedented degree of global cooperation. The second key to sustainable development is the stabilization of the global population. This is already occurring in high-income and even some middle-income countries, as families choose to have one or two children on average. The reduction of fertility rates should be encouraged in the poorer countries as well. Rapid and wholly voluntary reductions of fertility have been and can be achieved in poor countries. Success at reducing high fertility rates depends on keeping girls in school, ensuring that children survive, and providing access to modern family planning and contraceptives. Two centuries ago, the British thinker Thomas Robert Malthus famously warned that excessive population growth would cut short economic progress. That is a threat still with us today, but it is a warning, not an inevitable outcome. We face an urgent task: to adopt more sustainable technologies and lifestyles, and work harder to achieve a stable population of some 8 billion or so by mid-century, rather than the current path, which could easily carry the world to more than 10 billion people by 2100. http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/17/opinion/sachs-global-population/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQvsf2MUKRQ"]George Bernard Shaw Defends Hitler, Mass Murder - YouTube[/ame] This is what we have to look forward to from our liberal friends.
That's right Carl - what the world really needs is some good ole fashion Leftist genocide. You folks are certainly the experts, having outperformed even Hitler in the last century.
Funny, he said nothing about genocide, unless you consider birth control genocide, which would be pretty stupid. Yeah, obviously 7 billion people are easy to provide for, that's why we have no unemployment with our measly 300,000,000 and Africa has no starvation.
no matter how much or how little people you have, your always going to have unemployment and starvation.
This is beyond 'unemployment and starvation'. This is about an ecosysem that simply cannot handle this many humans. Amamzing how the right can never think deeper into a subject.
Really? Do people realize how much open space there is unihabited on this planet? do me a favor, whatever state you live in, get outside the city and just drive, 1 hours, 2 hours, 3.... and then tell me we don't have enough space and land to sustain the human race. And after you do that, please, tell me what it is you think we should do about the problem that you think we have. thanks
Africans are starving because they are backward and stupid. Africa is a rich land and the people of Africa can be rich also once they join the 21st Century. Or maybe the 22nd Century at the rate they are going.
Umm ya....I drive from LA to Phoenix alot..nothing but desert.... have fun there.... No we do not have enought space. You also seem to forget that there are 1.9 known million other species the Earth needs to support. How the world's oceans are running out of fish World Population Awareness
yes, we have plenty of space. lmao, Phoenix is in the dessert! those poor people who live there and move there every year, oh the horror. So, again I will ask, whats your solution?
Your owners have a plant to solve this "problem" [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX3oG1fBGVQ"]A Journey Through The Guide Stones - YouTube[/ame]
