Today we use you tube to display some of women's rights. I wonder if men believe the Tramp stamps. They can come with a message. If she is asking for sex, do you believe her since it is a tramp stamp? [video=youtube;6-W4NySPecE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-W4NySPecE[/video]
How do you define the word tramp? If a tattoo said "enter here" with an arrow pointed towards her butt I would not take it as a literal invitation for all, I would take it as her being provocative.
Question really goes to the women with tramp stamps. They know what they are called. So why do they have tramp stamps? It looks like a message to me.
Dodge noted, I am left wondering why you refuse to define the term tramp. I am betting for many reasons that vary from person to person. Plausible reasons can be to feel sexy, or to be provocative, or to appease their partner, or to rebel against their parents etc. What message does a tribal tattoo on the lower back say to you?
I believe a photo is worth a thousand words. I found a youtube site with two photos as shown at the top plus those contained in the video. Those are plausible reasons. A tribal tattoo on the lower back would depend on message or depiction. Off hand it is difficult to judge without actually seeing one.
the guy trolled the internet to find the WORST lower back tattoos online... then uses the derogatory term "tramp stamp" and compile a video of these awful tattoos which likely represent something like 0.0005% of all women with tattoos. The other 99pointwhatever% probably have beautiful lower back tattoos.... but let's ignore that and refer to this tiny representation as women's rights I suggest you stop beating about the bush and just get a tramp stamp on your lower back that says "I hate women"
I’m pretty sure a couple of those examples were of men. He even says as much when discussing at least one of them. It’s interesting how a largely gender-neutral concept of bad/inappropriate tattoos (if anything still more male-orientated, if decreasingly so) has been turning in to an attack on women alone here.
What a photo says to one is relative to the observer thus subjective. A tribal tattoo has no words thus what message the tattoo sends is relative to the observer thus subjective.
Well there you go. See how brilliant you are?? Did you see the tramp stamp with words on her back telling viewers to F her? Or rather directly, F me. Maybe that is subjective to you, but I expect men take it quite literally. - - - Updated - - - If a man has swastikas on his body, is that a message?
I see such ego driven self assessments as unnecessary. I make no assessment either way. To make an accurate assessment I would need to talk to the young lady and ask her what message she is trying to relay. Based upon what if not anecdotal evidence?
Who gets to decide what the message is, the observed or the observer? I once saw a documentary about a skinhead that beat up a gay guy. Today he and the gay man travel together and speak publicly against bias and hate. The former skinhead has turned his back on his former life yet he still has a visible swastika on his arm and when he was asked why did he not get the tattoo removed he said "because I never want to forget who I was and what I did." (Paraphrased) So the moral of the story is do not judge a book by its cover.
Of course. If a woman has swastikas on her body it's a message too. Stupid tattoos is still not a uniquely female issue.
I prefer to watch sugaring videos on YouTube, in case my next girlfriend wants a "full service" boyfriend.
So, I think I have your message. Do not judge the man with the swastikas tattooed on his body since it would be judging the book by the cover. - - - Updated - - - Thanks for introducing me to this practice. But I do not plan to do that. - - - Updated - - - Suppose she shows such a tattoo in the form of the Nazi swastika? Do you ask her why or the meaning? Do you believe the typical american will do what you say you would do?
Oh my god. Never would I make any statement that I hate women. Women are a joy to the world. My girls had mothers.
Yes if I wanted to know the reason for the tattoo and the message she was trying to send. For me to make such an assessment would require statistical data of which I know of none that exsists on this topic. I do believe that the objective will withhold judgment pending the conclusion of an inquiry while the biased will form a conclusion based upon incomplete evidence.
We seem willing to claim the male sends a message using the tattoo on the body when the tattoo is of things like the Nazi Swastika. I expect for most Americans, a female adorned with the same tattoo would be assumed to be "advertising a message. When a woman wears nice earrings, she is messaging. When she has a high fashion garb on, she messages. There are books with the topic, dress for success. I find the girls know that the "tramp stamp" has that name for some reason. I am not aware of the reason but it would not shock me if the girls started calling them tramp stamps.
Women have the right to put whatever kind of tattoo wherever they want. That's called a free country. Who cares why? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Assumption is not synonymous with fact so why assume when a simple clarifying question can render assumption unnecessary? And the message being sent is? Indeed yet a moot point as a lower back tattoo can be covered by clothing. I ague whatever the reason is it is likely based upon a bias as in the context of "tramp stamp" tramp is a negative.
Nice boyfriends do. - - - Updated - - - I love it when chics from the "Show Me" State simply show me their cute tattoos, wherever they may be. - - - Updated - - - "market friendly" comes to mind.
Those are good points and in your perfect world, your will would be imposed. - - - Updated - - - Frankly, I don't know what it tells me about you. That you like a tattoo is my guess.
Yes and they can also blow buggers from their nose. My point is just to comment. Not trying to tell any poster what to do vs tattoos.
