Woodward & Bernstein

Discussion in '9/11' started by Shinebox, Jan 3, 2015.

  1. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    For all the truthers especially the ones that insist the proof is right in front of our eyes of an inside job, no hijacked planes, blah blah blah. Where's your Pulitzer Prize??? It's just there for the taking right?
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OH MY ....... really what it takes is not only being able to write well, but also telling the story in a way that the public will get it. and this is ( because of the psychological warfare going on... ) one of the reasons why its so extremely difficult to get any traction with anything, people will dismiss the 9/11 as false flag idea because they have already been conditioned to think of the "truthers" as crack-pots and therefore very few people will have the guts to actually examine evidence. another facet of this is notion that people somehow need to be EXPERTS to actually get it and therefore many people deffer to experts. I refuse to play the game of "my experts are better than your experts" I KNOW what I KNOW and there are very good reasons why I KNOW what I KNOW.
     
  3. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    plenty of people can write well and all good writers are looking for that bestseller or blockbuster expose'. So why hasn't anyone blown this open if it so obviously an inside job? I think you know the answer to that question.
     
  4. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is, actually.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    People who winn Pulitzers with.proof' like truthers like to use,end up having to return them in disgrace,like Jayson Blair.
     
  6. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would never and have never used the sources I see 'em using. I use the NYTimes, LATimes, Washington Post, WSJ, FT, Government documents, academic research...the sources that get peeps a Pulitzer. There is an ungodly avalanche of information on the Internet from those sources.
     
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,834
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
  9. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    very serious problem with this whole fiasco,
    the fact that the prosecution, has yet to provide any prof
    that any of the 4 alleged airliners existed at all.

    sorry about that.........
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No proof that you'll accept,anyway....despite reams of proof presented
     
  11. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It sure would be great to have the proof.
     
  12. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    BUMP ...
     
  13. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you by chance post at http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumindex.php as beachnut?
     
  14. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
  15. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    At any rate, the similarities are uncanny.
     
  16. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    when are you going to address the thread topic? ...
     
  17. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roflol: (not the one I wanted to use. What happened to the normal laughing one?)

    I did address the OP. You know, post #4 from January 4th, 2015 that you never responded to.
     
  18. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    really? ... that was a pretty weak response not worth addressing ... surely Seymour Hersh would have been all over this ... where's Noam Chomsky when you need him? ...

    all you have is a bunch of cranks making money off YouTube spouting nonsense that you regurgitate due to confirmation bias ...

    you have yet to posit a theory ...
     
  19. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I actually had a several months worth of back-and-forth e-mail exchange with him last year about 9/11. Like many extremely controversial things in U.S. History (of the Northwoods/MK-Ultra variety), he won't probe it like he has with the Cold War, Indochina War or propaganda.
     

Share This Page