Would Ron Paul suffacte Barack Obama in a debate?

You haven't presented one solid piece of evidence substantiating any of your claims. I Question your intelligence. Are you a PSI OPS Propagandist? you seem to do nothing but refute solid evidence with tacky one-liners, that only prove your ignorance...

 

He rarely - if EVER - does.

You seem to have him down cold.

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1p-E2xmpjA"]Hillary Clinton stating that the US propaganda machine (corporate Media) is losing the INFO WAR[/ame]

 

He will probably ignore me, I don't pay him as well as the NEO-CONs...

Dujac needs a cure for the Stockholm Syndrome...

 

that's just not true

 

Prove it...

 

pretty much nailed the Obama Liberal mindset.

 

read the threads

 

Name one of Obama's policies that have directly helped you? just curious.

 

irrelevant, i help myself, i don't depend on any politicians for that

 

Oh but it is relevant, because you see, by you voting for Obama and touting his victories, He must be doing and saying things that have helped you.

So spit it out. name one. if you can.

And if none of the Politicians can help you, why are you in here trying to shoot down Ron Paul??

 

show me where i've touted any of his victories

i don't like liars

 

Well you tout Obama's supposed victory over Ron Paul in a debate below here, which hasn't happend yet. :

Then you should really hate Obama then. hahahahaa

but just for grins, what has Paul lied about that got your hanes in a wad so bad?

 

saying ron paul doesn't have what it takes to get up to bat, isn't the same thing as touting the president

but it isn't surprising to me that you try to twist it into something it's not

 

I forgot to mention, I'm sure you voted for Option #2 in the poll too. It's obvious.

You're just spouting nonsense now. throwing empty insults at Ron Paul doesn't help your argument one bit.

You claim he's a liar, prove it.
You claim he can't beat Obama in a debate. where's your rationale for that claim?


You see, you can't just spit out incoherent nonsense and expect people to take you serious. everybody else is posting why they think Ron Paul can or cannot shut Obama down. but all you're doing is saying "no he can't" and "I hate liars" in various ways but offering no reasoning behind your comments.

and if you really "hate liars", then you should be ready to hang Obama, right?

 

wrong again, i didn't vote at all, the questions are clearly biased

 

How are they biased? it's a yes/no/maybe so question.

You're not that good at this are you?

 

no, it's more than a yes/no/maybe question

if you don't understand how these questions are biased, you're either lying or deluded:

"Yes, even with teleprompters helping him, RP wins easy"

"No, Obama is way too smooth to lose. I'm hooked."

"It would be a tie and we'd need Howard Sterns' vote to break it."


no wonder ron couldn't win a primary election in 2008, you guys muck everything up

 

Even if it's set up like this:

1. Ron Paul wins
2. Barack Obama wins
3. I'm undecided

you'll still vote Obama, given your obvious hate for Ron Paul.

So Semantics aside, you're not fooling anyone here. It's obvious who you think would win in a debate so why not vote and say it?.

 

you really have no clue what you're talking about

 

I'm talking about this poll I created that you haven't answered yet?

what's your excuse for not paying attention to what's being discussed?

 

really, you don't have a single clue

 

this would not even happen in the first place....Obama's best plan is to ignore him. RP is too ignorant to realize that Obama is playing this game at a higher level then he ever will.

 

turn off your tv, and look at the trends on the internet...
Ron Paul is dominating all the other candidates, all across the board.
And your notion of having Obama ignore Dr. Paul, as a strategy to win a debate, is null... Ron Paul tends to win debates, even with the lack of exposure...

 

the polls mean little if anything right now.... i will start paying attention to them once Iowa comes around. actually it isnt null because RP will not win the the Republican nomination. why would he debate him if he cant even get Republicans behind him.

and by the way.... just because something is on the internet... does not mean it true.