Yet ANOTHER architect dismisses "official" story

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 2, 2011.

  1. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Keep peddling the "official" BS. You'll eventually confuse some folks enough that your agenda can be vindicated.
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More paranoia, how typical.

    Seriously, how will the 'truth' ever come out if all you do is whine about how everyone is against you?

    You present no evidence, you link to articles of death beams from space, you get even the simplest of facts wrong (who designed the WTC again?), you falsely accuse anyone who disagrees with you of being 'shills'... and then you declare 'victory'.

    You see why I find my little pastime amusing?
     
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Nothing better to do for years on end huh? In multiple forums too! I'd say you're past it being "amusing". Sounds like true dedication to me.
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where did I say I had nothing better to do? Making stuff up again?
     
  5. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I just assumed that you being available 24/7, to post here and in other forums, that you had nothing else to do while 'in between flights".
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What other forums do I post on?

    You assume incorrectly.
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Abovetopsecret for one.
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How often, do you suppose?
     
  9. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your obsession with me is very flattering.
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I wasn't talking about you.

    Do try to keep up.
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My apologies. Your dedication to the cause is admirable.
     
  12. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, you are not Austrailian, so now we are clear on what I mean.
     
  13. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    True

    They fell like buildings rigged and blown with explosives.
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, they didn't, because there was ZERO evidence of explosives such as rdx needed th sever the girders, nor blasting resediue
     
  15. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Evidence of nanothermite was found.
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    thermite is an incendeary,not an explosive.

    And thermite is iron oxide and aluminum,bot which were present in the WTC structure.

    plus the fact that the fires at the towers burned for an hour and a hour and a half,NONE of the 'explosives' was set off by the fire?
     
  17. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They never tested for explosive residue at ground zero, and where is it written in stone, that explosives must be of the same type as RDX to sever steel and other materials?
     
  18. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    444
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have proof that the Government faked 9/11. AFOAF was employed by Dick Cheney in a highly secret "training" operation where a new, undetectable super explosive was placed inside the WTC and supposedly the Government was going to train bomb sniffing dogs there. But "conveniently" this exercise was to take place on 9/11.

    Shortly after he confided this information to me, he went missing. I think he might be in Gitmo, or Iraq. Not sure. If anything happens to me.. I'll be back there is a knock at the door..
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because as you keep insisting it was an explosive demolition, and that's what they would have used,no inefficient trying tu 'burn through' just brute explosive power
     
  20. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is RDX the only thing which can provide "brute explosive power"?
     
  21. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    <sigh> It's what they would USE
     
  22. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is no saying for sure what "they" would use. The destructive power of a harnessed hurricane would be a great source for brute explosive power, wouldn't you think?
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,958
    Likes Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    83

    depends on what you are trying to do. its the most common yes.
     
  24. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes I know you say it's what they would use, but that's not what I asked.. Instead of getting exasperated just try answering the very simple question. Is RDX the only thing they could use?
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You tell ME...I'm only telling you if it were a 'controlled demolition', the parties involved would use what they're familiar with,RDX, an EXPLOSIVE,NOT an incendiary
     

Share This Page