No one is "crying" about "no election fraud." The only one crying is the obese orange spoiled toddler who just lost the election by more votes than anyone has ever lost an election.
Several posts in several threads claimed no voter fraud. It also wasnt the largest vote spread by total vote or percentage. You guys sure do cry a lot when your wrong and then end up lying more.
And there has been voter fraud? Where? The liars are the ones claiming there was rampant voter fraud.
Curious.....this is where I think you and I have a disconnect. To me, well liked in Washington D.C. does not necessarily mean you are a gracious person that gets along well and get things done. (I can't for the life of me find anything Joe Biden has done productively) It can mean, and I believe it does, you are the type that goes along to get along. If the military complex thinks it would be good for either politics or the military industrial complex to start a war. you go along with that. If shipping jobs overseas will help the lobbyists with the most power.....you do that. If catering to the fears of China Virus or global warming, in spite of any evidence to the contrary, you go with it and it is safe because you certainly have a "base" that will not rock the boat. You submit to members of Nato who shirk their fiscal duties while the U.S. carries the bulk of the burden. Having dwelt in the swamp for 47 years and promoted the Iraq War as well as the Iran giveaway, Joe Biden is that man. He has ALWAYS been on the side of what is most popular in Washington D.C. He is popular in Washington. Is that a good thing? Now he has catered to, and abided by the rabid Communist wolves in Washington that believe they are going to have Joe Biden for lunch. The right is the safest bet that won't happen and I think you know it. If we can't have four more years of America first we must be vigilant to keep what liberty we have.
And how do you know different? Is it because you have the interests of big government and their media machine behind you? We know there is censoring going on with Big Tech and media interests. When you speak of science.....you speak of YOUR science.
Snowflakes cannot take the heat that Donald Trump has. A media that is against him since 2016 95% of the time while he takes hardball questions and his opponent gets t-ball questions. Also a high tech that censors anything contrary to their left wing desires. 3 Years of "collusion" inquiry. All the time he has had Judgement appointments that shatters records, had Nato pay close to their fair share. Do you still hear of ISIS doing irreparable damage to Americans? Mass illegal refugees storming our southern border? He is hardly a snowflake and you know it. He has pulled back for now while you celebrate a hollow victory. Whether he takes it now, or in four years, a Biden Administration would accomplish little.
Michigan protested the Dominion Software errors handing 6,000 votes to Biden and Dominion blamed it on voters. That sounds as if Dominion tossed voters under the bus.
It will be sweet should another Democrat justice pass away and Trump gets to install one more Justice of his selection.
I read the actual scientists reports. https://judithcurry.com/ Disconnect in the relationship between GMST and ECS Posted on November 11, 2020 by curryja | 37 Comments by Kenneth Fritsch Abstract. An analysis is presented of he disconnection between the CMIP5 and CMIP6 Historical and Future periods when considering the relationship of the individual model GMST changes and the climate sensitivity. I have included a simple model that can account for the period disconnection using the negative forcing of aerosol/cloud effects in the Historical period that is carried forward into the Future period. I attribute some of the uncertainty in simulations of this simple model to endogenous model decision (selection) uncertainty that leads to variations in the changes of the negative forcing in the Historical period carried forward into the Future period. Introduction: There have been a number of references in the climate science literature (references 1 through10) concerning the disconnection between the change in the global mean surface temperature (GMST) in the Historical period (used in this analysis the time period 1850 or 1861 to 2014) and the climate sensitivity of models as measured by Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) and Transient Climate Response (TCR) for individual CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models. That disconnection has been made more obvious by the CMIP6 ensemble of models having higher climate sensitivities than that in the CMIP5 ensemble and yet having the near same GMST trends in the Historical period (references 11 and 12). https://judithcurry.com/2020/11/11/disconnect-in-the-relationship-between-gmst-and-ecs/ Conclusions: In this analysis it was shown that there is a statistically significant disconnection between the CMIP5 and CMIP6 Historical and Future period scenarios when considering the relationship between the individual model climate sensitivities and GMST values. The correlations of changes in model GMST for scenario to scenario ensembles and ensemble scenario GMST changes to F2x/λ provide a means for analyzing the degree of disconnection between the Historical to Future scenarios and connection for Future to Future scenarios.
Sea Level is reported as a future event. With me so far? This debunks the previous claims for the future. It covers all warming events forecast.
SEE POST 211 That is not a scientific form of reply. I gave plenty of evidence. If you refuse to accept evidence, who is the one posting crap?
My point was that millions of people scattered around the world, depend on meltwater from mountain snows & glaciers, for their daily water supplies. Global warming is melting those glaciers as a source of water. Those glaciers can't be replaced. Neither can the waters they provide. That will force human migrations, which in turn will force conflicts. Wouldn't it be more sensible to deal with the global warming now rather than wait until these events happen, & our children & grandchildren's lives are uprooted?
But with the ever increasing heat, glaciers worldwide are all melting. Once the mountain glaciers are gone, the people depending on their meltwater will be left high & dry. We could possibly avert this disaster if we kick into gear now & fix global warming. But if we continue being passive, they'll melt away & it'll be too late. We can't make new glaciers, you know.
We need to plug off all the volcanoes, stop solar flares from the sun, but most importantly we need to mandate China, India and others bring their emission standards to meet ours. That last one is absolutely necessary before we spend any more of our economy in that direction!
I agree that China & India, plus many other countries must do more, but we shouldn't allow ourselves to be dependent on their actions before we get into gear. Waiting for everyone else to go first is a prescription for disaster. We are responsible for a large percentage of the gases causing global warming, & we need to take responsibility for cleaning our portion up, while simultaneously encouraging them to move forward too.
I would say both parties have both issues but historically fraud was Democrat and suppression was republican I thought?
