Youtube keeping truth about 911 alive

Discussion in '9/11' started by LaDairis, May 24, 2016.

  1. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Without youtube, Israel would be in the clear for 911. The initial truthers - demolition experts, "Pilots for 911 Truth" etc., they were bullied, attacked, and murdered by W's henchmen and the "US media." But youtube, well, Israel does not control youtube.

    What's on youtube??

    The actual Pentagon footage of the cruise missile

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zze32ZEjt30

    a really fantastic documentary of all Pentagon footage - all which show a cruise missile, none which show a 757...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypc4ieJO0pg


    Clear proof that the 767 that we all saw hit the South Tower was a CARGO version of the 767, not the passenger...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsmc_rS2jOo


    Clear proof that Shanksville was not a plane, but rather just a ditch someone dug out and filled with metal junk. Other "official" explanations, kid you not, are that the "plane" "disintegrated" or "buried itself" like Scooby Doo did in the flower pot...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjQKrGWOrfk


    And, yeah, tons of expert videos documenting the demolition of the towers and 7...


    Youtube is the beginning of the end of "Israel..."
     
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,260
    Likes Received:
    1,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Israel is not the problem and neither is Saudi Arabia, the problem is the US government. No foreign government can successfully destroy the US without help from within. Nations consist of ordinary people, it's the governments of these nations who control The People if The People do nothing.
     
  3. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All hail the faculty of Youtube in the University of Google, where anything goes and usually does.

    First video is a hoax.

    Second video just promotes the insanity of the first.

    The third video has been manipulated and comes to an incorrect conclusion.

    The fourth video is just nuts.
     
  4. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    My first video was "Find the 757?" ... after that load of crap, I was introduced to numerous revisions "Loose Change" ... probably others thrown in here and there ... now we are getting Drive in Theater epics running 4 hrs plus ... and nothing really new except other crank theories ...

    I actually watched the full "New Pearl Harbor" but quit taking notes about 30 minutes in ... I had to hit pause so many times, it would have taken me 16 hours to watch the extremely edited and omission filled, propaganda POS ...

    Truthers fail to recognize the problems with there confirmation biased sources yet don't grant the educated and rational people the same right ...

    I don't have any agenda ... I live a nice life but have a distrust of mainstream politicians and corporate cronies ... but I can't buy into this many people being on the take in the crazy theories of Truther Nation ...
     
  5. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, Youtube would have to be the poorest source on the internet. I'm glad you've also noticed the double standards of evidence employed by truthers. I too have no agenda and I don't trust any politicians, but logic is logic and 9/11 truth continually fail in that area.
     
  6. vino909

    vino909 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    4,638
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    48
    interesting.... a cruise missile..... from the grassy knoll perhaps.....?
     
  7. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Check the exposure of the scam that Pilots for Truth promoted at one point.

    The image as it was circulated:

    [​IMG]

    The reality:

    [​IMG]

    Yeah, it's all about the truth they say. LOL I find that hard to believe in light of the many lies 9/11 truth knowingly circulates.
     
  8. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Youtube can be a resource for research, however you have to be careful and think critically at every step.
    The internet is a bit like a huge library only in the traditional library, the stacks are clearly marked "fiction" and "non-Fiction"
    however on the network, you have to be careful with your choices, there are phonies, crazies & outright frauds in abundance.

    Speaking of critical thinking, why do people believe that its OK for three skyscrapers to collapse in the exact manner of a CD,
    when the forces working on those buildings where not focused to do the job?
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,260
    Likes Received:
    1,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ignorant people always try to kill the messenger.

    "If thine eye offends thee, pluck it out."
     
  10. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who said it was ok? They didn't collapse in the manner of a CD. Show me a CD that resembles the collapse of 7WTC? The 'forces' working on the buildings have been explained in the reports. No one has been able to disprove them thus far. There has been 15 years of blather from 9//11 truth, but no -one has been able to disprove the accepted version.

    At least you acknowledge that Youtube is full of junk.
     
  11. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, the feigned drama! When I read your posts I picture Dr. Smith from Lost in Space in the '60's.

    Most truther videos are junk made by ignorant amateurs-that's a fact. To critique a source is not shooting the messenger or any other such idiotic nonsense. It is simply critiquing the rubbish posited by 9/11 truth and regurgitated on line.

    So now source criticism is invalid on Planet Truther? What will they trash next now that reason and academic practices have been denounced?
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Hey Blues...

    I'm still waiting for you to address this issue.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=452072&page=15&p=1066163607#post1066163607


    Click on this link.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M

    Go to the 4:27:48 time mark and listen to the argument about the sagging trusses. Please address the issue put forth about the sagging trusses in that video at the 4:27:48 time mark.

    If you keep saying you refuse to look at the info because I haven't summarized it, you're obviously avoiding it because it's too hard for you to obfuscate without looking silly.
     
  13. HonestJoe

    HonestJoe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    11,429
    Likes Received:
    1,867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ItÂ’s much easier to push a narrative using video rather than prose. The video controls the pace and structure much more, making it easier to push past gaps or inconsistencies in evidence or logic and can be used to build up emotive and reactive impressions rather than careful consideration. Prose is taken in at the readers pace, they can pause, check back to earlier sections or look up references freely and it takes much more skill to elicit strong emotive reactions.
     
  14. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I never said "full of junk" I said some of it is junk, and some of it is useful and it is up to the thinking individual to sort it out.
    also, the fact is that there are several VERY good rebuttals to the official story, but the problem is that these rebuttals fail to achieve traction because of the propaganda war that is being waged in the media. Have you seen anything by Tony Szamboti or David Chandler ?
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Here's something he can watch.

    WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkp-4sm5Ypc

    WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k

    WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw
     
  16. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,052
    Likes Received:
    9,514
    Trophy Points:
    113
  17. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I'd like to hear some analyses of those videos from both Blues63 and Ronstar. There's a lot of info there so please just watch them and don't insist that I summarize the info before you'll watch them. Summarizing the info is just a waste of my time as it serves no purpose. The thinking viewers here are watching them.
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,260
    Likes Received:
    1,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What are you expecting besides "cranks" and rants about "YouTube"?
     
  19. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,052
    Likes Received:
    9,514
    Trophy Points:
    113
    i watched all those videos years ago.

    now its time for YOU to use your own words and make your case.
     
  20. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0


    That's a pretty funny little Mossad lie there, almost as funny as the NBC "news" clip with a crane removing a perfectly intact tail of the "757," Problem - the hole in the side of the Pentagon isn't wide enough to fit that tail through...

    LOL!!!!


    Fellow Americans, realize you are up against dozens of chosen with lots of cash, and they will stay here and lie and post photoshopped fudge until time ends, because they know that when you see the truth and understand the truth, the Truthers have all of it, and the Zionists have none, which is what Judaism is really all about.

    Take this 757. Can a 757 really fly 400 mph at ground level? Can it really smash through 25 feet of steel reinforced concrete? If the nose of the 757 did enter the Pentagon at ground level, would that not put the "engines" ... um ... like IN THE GROUND!!!!


    Wake up, Americans. You aren't as dumb as the Israelis think you are....
     
  21. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,052
    Likes Received:
    9,514
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you're insistance on constantly spewing anti-Semitism, only makes the truthers look worse then they already do.

    but please, keep it up. :)
     
  22. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Truth = anti-semitism

    whether it be 911 truth, climate truth, Marines in Lebanon 1982 truth, USS Liberty truth, JFK truth

    I know I'm still missing some...
     
  23. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,052
    Likes Received:
    9,514
    Trophy Points:
    113
    25 feet of reinforced concrete?

    where was that?
     
  24. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,052
    Likes Received:
    9,514
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh, so the Israelis bombed the Marine baracks in 1982?

    the Israelis killed JFK??

    LOL!!!!
     
  25. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    speculation abounds
    look at the facts about the physical events or for that matter the MSM claims about the alleged events.
    commercial airliners used as weapons, ya, right a hollow aluminum tube aircraft performing as a missile.
    who is putting who on here? ALL of the hijacked airliners allegedly used as weapons that day are total fakes.
    what evidence convinces anyone beyond a reasonable doubt that said airliners were in fact used as weapons?
     

Share This Page