YouTube suspends One America News Network channel for violating COVID-19 misinformation policy

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Patricio Da Silva, Nov 26, 2020.

  1. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Sigh. Censorship is a lousy word to use. My cruise forum only wanting posts related to cruising, is not censorship. It's content management. Saying otherwise, suggests something nefarious.
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2020
  2. Pred

    Pred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24,409
    Likes Received:
    17,393
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You need to not use the fake news to create quotes. Regarding climate change this article explains it best. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51213003

    Strike 1!

    And he NEVER said “press” is the enemy. He said FAKE news media. There is a significant difference. So strike 2.

    And Democrats did rig the election. They had the MSM spouting lies in Bidens favor, so that could easily be considered rigging. They lied about the dangers of voting in person which can considered rigging. Tech companies, just like the MSM, were also working to rig it all in Bidens favor through censorship and bogus “fact” checking.

    So strike 3.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2020
  3. JET3534

    JET3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Messages:
    13,372
    Likes Received:
    11,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Understand this. Free speech is a lot more unlimited in the US than it is in Australia.
     
  4. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,680
    Likes Received:
    32,417
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh well.

    Elections have consequences.

    Biden WON and TRUMP LOST.

    At this point, it is complete Sour Grapes for Trump to blame anyone but himself.
     
  5. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,108
    Likes Received:
    17,340
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Without a highly partisan lens, There is no difference, the opposition could make the same claim towards news sources they do not like and be as accurate, this is why there is no such thing as the 'fake news media'. I swear, the right wing sites 'gateway pundit' etc, are way way way more 'fake' than CNN, etc., he is alleging. But, I don't call them fake, I just call them irresponsible, but I'm not saying they should be hated or ignored. AS president, what he is doing is highly irresponsible and dangerous.

    He's pointing to press he doesn't like, and they are just as much 'free press' as free press he does like. That's why they are free, capiche? You can say whatever the **** you what without fear of retribution, but he's exacting retribution on the free press. Just because it's the press he doesn't like doesn't change the fact that he is waging war on the free press, and that's just ****ing wrong. The ONLY thing standing between citizens and tyranny, are not your guns, but a vigorous and totally free press. Thank providence freedom of speech is in the constitution, and this president is at war with the first amendment, what the **** up.

    In point of fact, in terms of principles, there is no distinction between the two, and, in fact, his incessant harping on 'the press is the enemy of the people' ( which he often said without qualification, so I beg to differ ) served to undermine confidence in the press and that is dangerous.

    No evidence that dems rigged the election, you are spouting nonsense.

    From another post:

    think about what rigging the election would entail. There would have to be a coordinated conspiracy whereby operatives would have to apply for jobs, and be hired in several hundred, if not thousands, of field offices where counting is done, months in advance, and the scheme would require the cooperation of election officials and volunteers, from both parties, across ALL of the 'predicted' swing states ( noting that some were not predicted, so the conspiracy would have to entail beyond the swing states, predicting before hand which states they might be ).

    The odds of doing that and getting away with it are practically nil, such that no one with half a brain would try it. There is no way anyone could get away with such a hairbrained scheme, and evidence for such thing would be plentiful, from testimonies, volunteers with guilty consciences turning states evidence, and so forth ( there just isn't any evidence of it ). It is also why Russians were unable to do it, internally, so they went the external route.


    No ****ing way Trump is an 'environmentalist' like he claims

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/climate/trump-environment-rollbacks-list.html

    'Don't pay attention to what politicians say, pay attention to what they do". ---Rachel Maddow

    Judging Trump's deeds, he is no environmentalist.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2020

Share This Page