How psychotic is the US regime?

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Marshal, Jun 29, 2012.

  1. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The US has released speech after speech and anti-Iran rhetoric.

    The American people are almost a wonderful people who contribute to the world a lot.

    But today they are led by a psychotic regime who will lead them on the road of destruction just like the Germans were led in WW2.

    Probably, what will happen is the US will continue threatening the existence of a regime which threatens the very existence of another country, and they will keep threatening each other with no end of threatening, until one of them (Iran) blows themselves up in a false-flag nuclear accident.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/27/wo...ic-speech.html

    What do you think?

     
  2. DoneEatingGrass

    DoneEatingGrass Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    18

    The link you posted is broken...
     
  3. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/29/us-iran-nuclear-idUSBRE85S1KV20120629

    Iran's U.N. envoy criticizes U.S., EU over nuclear talks

    By Louis Charbonneau

    NEW YORK | Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:54pm EDT

    (Reuters) - Western powers negotiating with Iran over its nuclear program have not been "serious enough" in their attempts to resolve an escalating stand-off with the Islamic Republic, Tehran's U.N. envoy said on Friday.

    Iran held what officials said were intense talks in Moscow earlier this month with the five permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany - the so-called P5+1 - about its nuclear program, but a breakthrough once again failed to materialize.

    "It is clear for us that some members of the P5+1 for whatever reasons ... are not forthcoming and serious enough for finding a solution," Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee said in a statement to reporters at the Iranian mission.

    "If the talks do not proceed as it should be, we are going to have another stand-off," he said. "The USA and some Europeans have said they are going to increase their pressure and sanctions against us, and this ... indicates that they are not willing to engage with us in a meaningful dialogue."

    Iran has been in a decade-long dispute with Western powers and their allies over its nuclear program, which they suspect is aimed at developing the capability to produce nuclear weapons. Tehran denies the charge.

    The Moscow talks followed two rounds of negotiations since talks with Iran resumed in April after a 15-month hiatus during which the West cranked up sanctions pressure and Israel repeated threats to bomb Iranian nuclear sites if diplomacy failed to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear bomb.

    Iranian officials have repeatedly insisted on an easing of sanctions and an acknowledgment of the country's right to enrich uranium, conditions that the United States and the European Union have not accepted. Khazaee reiterated those demands on Friday.

    Khazaee also touched on the 16-month conflict in Syria, where the United States and the EU have accused Iran of providing military support to President Bashar al-Assad in his assault on an increasingly militarized opposition.

    The Iranian diplomat indicated that Tehran's exclusion from Geneva negotiations of major world powers and key regional players organized by international mediator Kofi Annan on Syria was not in the interest of those attempts to resolve the crisis.

    "They have to take into consideration the power and influence of Iran in the region," Khazaee said.

    'ILLEGITIMATE MEANS'

    Khazaee reiterated comments from Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili in a letter to EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton against adopting "unconstructive measures" - a clear reference to new sanctions - that harm negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program.

    He distributed to reporters an English translation of Jalili's letter - Iranian state television reported about it on Thursday.

    "There is no doubt that any gesture which damages the confidence-building process would be counterproductive," Jalili wrote, adding that "those who replace logic with illegitimate means in the talks shall be accountable for any damage to the productive process of the talks."

    An EU embargo on Iranian oil takes full effect on July 1. Iran's crude oil exports have fallen by some 40 percent this year, according to the International Energy Agency.

    Four U.N. Security Council resolutions since 2006 have demanded Iran suspend all its enrichment-related activities due to concerns about the nature of the nuclear program. Tehran has refused to suspend enrichment, arguing that it is a sovereign right guaranteed under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
     
  4. signcutter

    signcutter New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,716
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't be absurd... U.S politicians are NOT insane... they know exactly what they are doing.
     
  5. DoneEatingGrass

    DoneEatingGrass Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Nuclear posturing, is ridiculous, no matter who has the weapons...
    No one is going to win. It's a stalemate, everyone loses.
    So does it really matter which states/countries are allowed to produce WMD?

    If you ask me the OP is a chest thumping exercise in futility. Yet another country wants to flex their so called power...gimme a break, you might as well start flexing your muscles to me online, telling me how you're gonna beat me up...on-line.
     
  6. gchamblee

    gchamblee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    i dont consider reuters a reliable or credible source of anything after they were caught photoshopping knives out of the hands of the passengers on the flotilla. that being said, i guess we have the only legitimate regime that came to power through democratic elections.
     
  7. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, I expect the United States does not want Iran and its psychotic rhetoric to dominate a Middle East, which has already proven itself psychotic in militant attacks.

    The question will be whether the United States will weaken Iran... And what that will do to Iranian anger... Regime change, all out attack, etc.

    My guess is regime change will be best for the region.... Russians hope the Iranian regime will "change" itself, and the US will be supportive of their changes.

    Only Russians can do this.

     
  8. Borat

    Borat Banned

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    23,909
    Likes Received:
    9,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    While unelected mullahs are in power any hope of regime change is naive, the mullahs control the pseudo-election process and any "change" will still bring people with exactly the same ideology to power. Overthrowing the mullahs is the only way to actually change the regime but another Iranian revolution does not seem to be on agenda any time soon. Then, you never know, these things are unpredictable.
     
  9. trout mask replica

    trout mask replica New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Messages:
    12,320
    Likes Received:
    67
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't worry, given time, the US will engineer one.
     
  10. daddyofall

    daddyofall Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,579
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Or the Iranians themselves will, next time there's an election and the the guy with less votes wins. That's all it took last time.
     
  11. gchamblee

    gchamblee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    ya but all those people are dead or in prison now
     
  12. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Such as the election of Garge Busch in 2004.

     
  13. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    How 'psychotic' is the US regime.

    The real thing with the so called US regime, is that A) They are in the shadows B) They operate outwith the democratic process.

    However, that does not make it impossible to get a measure on how psychotic they are, and have been, down the decades.

    I should really not need to add the caveat that US regime does not = US people, but I probably do, so that's it mentioned.

    Firstly, what does psychotic actually mean...

    Let's be more specific...

    Signs and symptoms

    Hallucinations. Hallucinations may occur in any of the five senses and take on almost any form, which may include simple sensations (such as lights, colors, tastes, and smells) to experiences such as seeing and interacting with fully formed animals and people, hearing voices, and having complex tactile sensations.

    Delusions

    Psychosis may involve delusional beliefs, some of which are paranoid in nature.

    Catatonia

    Catatonia describes a profoundly agitated state in which the experience of reality is generally considered to be impaired.

    Thought disorder

    Thought disorder describes an underlying disturbance to conscious thought.


    Yes, so, based on that scale, I would say the answer to your question is acutely psychotic.

    You can also measure it by their actions and deeds, which they usually are able to carry out through the proxy of the paid shills that Americans call their political choices.

    Jack
     
  14. philxx

    philxx New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The problem with the Thinking of the US government is that to promote Nationalism you have to have a national economy that works .so that you can say look we are going forward living standards are increasing ,the economy is stable and demonstrat it ,unfortunately poor bankrupt US Imperialism is not only economically bankrupt it is morally and intellectually.

    the only competative edge that the US has is its military Arsenal nothing else .

    POTUS,definitely is a Mass murdering Maniac that draws up assassination lists of other humans even his own countrymen ,every week in the oval office ,total blood soaked mass mudering animal ,oh and some stupids call it Democracy .

    you could very well have a drone with your name on it with threads like this one.
     
  15. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am too important a scientist to be put to harm. If the United States lowers its metric on militants to include verbal assault... If the United States deprives potential supporters of the dignities of life... Then €£¥#%^ them they do not deserve my technologies.

    The war will end when the United States stops fighting.

     
  16. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are not his lists.

    He has no real power.

    He is just one of several actors that they own.

    He's just paid to take the flak for a few years, then gets to retire, and make money as a speaker, or some other BS thing.

    Whoever makes up these lists, it's not Obama or any US President.

    I wonder who could possibly be the real hand behind those lists...

    *rubs chin*
     
  17. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Not only that, under US Noahide laws, adopted in 1991, it is a crime to call all that stuff "murder".
     
  18. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What "Noahide" laws did we adopt in 1991?
     
  19. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What "Noahide" laws did we adopt in 1991?
     
  20. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is it?

    News to me.
     
  21. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Or when the bad muslim people are too shocked and saddened to fight and they lose their will to live and diminish into the dry, waterless dust that was once their land.
     
  22. Eadora

    Eadora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How Psychotic is the US Regime ? [​IMG]

    Probably
    as Psychoic as the US People
    Neither more, Nor Neither Less
    & accepting the above post NORMAL then they would certainly pass the test :mrgreen:

    BeWare & BeAware
    Some of the BadPeople are NOT Muslim, at all !~
    & Some of them are your next door Neighbors

    & Some of them are running your Goddamed Government !


    Now you should ask yourself Manny
    Where does their 'waterless desert' end ? & where does yours begin ?


    Life to the Fullest at the End of Empire

    [​IMG]

    Now here's the GoodNewzzz


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpSUkjuABXM&feature=g-vrec .

    HAVE A NICE DAY ! [​IMG]

    .

    .
     
  23. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What was that????

    An explosion in a font shop?
     
  24. Liebe

    Liebe Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Based on Jack's copy and paste of what the term psychotic means, a regime cannot be such. It is a psychiatric evaluation of the state of mind of an individual and cannot be implied to a collective. OP is stupid.
     
  25. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OP can and will apply anything to a collective.

    The brain itself is a collective. The collective acts as one larger creature. Behaviour from the United States has personality on the scale of a large organism, and that organism can be described as psychotic.

    I agree the post is stupid.
     

Share This Page