How psychotic is the US regime?

Your apology there, is...of no worth.

You are not prepared to look at anything....that isn't state fed, mass media fed, are you?

You may think you are...but you aren't.

How many times have you voted at a general 'election'?

Who for?

You also write strange, for someone from 'Britain'.

ApologiZe?

What next - Color?

 

no no no no no no.....


I'M not providing proof that Israel is NOT behind it, you gave a theory that Israel is now let's check the logic of that theory, if it fails than the theory fails, note, there was another theory that the US accepted and which the accused party also admitted eagerly - so - failing YOUR theory will be logical, but that doesn't mean it has to fail - so let's check it:

you made two claims, one that Israeli agents were spotted drinking and "celebrating" the occasion, those were 5 Israeli youngsters, I asked if its logical that Israel that planned this so much will send such idiots to film it in such a manner?, if its not logical and there and your only accusation is that they are Israelis - what exactly are we to do with this evidence???


2nd, you said the very mysterisly the Israeli company (why is it related to the gov? we run a free market...) sold its space a week before the attack (might be even a month, you didn't supply a link), you didn't make a claim just sort of left that in the air...., if your theory is correct than Israel wanted to save Israeli/Jewish lives by that move, I noted that you cant open a serius office in the world trade center no less that is only hires Jews or Israelis, so that makes no sense to me,

I'm not saying the Israelis didn't film it or that an Israeli company didn't close before the attacks - I mean those 2 claims don't proof and don't contribute to your theory, actually they go against it as its unlikely Israel is behind it AND behind your 2 claims.

 

"There comes a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part, you can't even passively take part. And you've got to put your bodies on the gears, and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus. And you've got to make it stop

 

We are suffering, and all thanks to the incompetent morons on Wall Street who caused the global recession in the first place!

 

I believe there was a Jew involved too......


Please, some credit for years of planning....

 

The complete inability to take responsibility for one's own actions, mistakes and failures is one of the primary characteristics of the uber-leftist/Islamofascist alliance. Always up to their neck in a pile of sh&t and it's always someone else's fault, the Jews, the Wall Street, the Zionists, the US, the Imperialists.... LOL

 

The question is who made the most money out of 9/11?

 

For conspiracy idiots:

...their rental lease contract with the Port Authority expired on September 1. Still, Zim Israel had kept a small office behind in the World Trade Center, an office which consisted of their computer shipping tracking equipment. All of the computers were destroyed in the 9/11 attack and Zim's operations were actually down for a short period. Why would Israel have opened their merchant marine fleet to such vulnerability?

And there was another Israeli company in WTC which somehow was not 'warned'

Sigal Srur, ClearForest's director of human resources, said that four or five of the company's 18 workers were in the building when it was hit. "They got out at the last minute, and two who were lightly injured with scrapes have already been discharged from the hospital," she said from the company's Or Yehuda R&D offices.


In other words according to conspiracy idiots one Israeli company was forewarned months in advance, another was not forewarned at all, the employees of both companies were still in the building when it was bombed. Well, no one has ever accused these conspiracy lunatics of having common sense.

 

Who? from what?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

 

well, one has to be blind to not notice it's all fault of the above-mentioned.

 

I think that if one takes a global look he will find a distinct difference between countries that take responsibility over their actions and status and those that don't, for instance one that does leads Europe - at least economicly and another the "free world", there are many others ofc,

perhaps it also has to do with regime method, some that promoted free thinking etc', dont know,will be interesting to find out.

 

LOL case in point. Russia has the biggest amount of land and natural resources in the world. Yet they blame their miserable conditions not on their own culture, their alcoholism, their corruption, the stupidity and incompetence of their leaders and bureaucrats, the laziness and inadequacy of their work force (most of whom are drunk by lunch time), their never ending slavish personality cults...they blame their sorry state of affairs on JOOZ and Capitalists.

Ironically the neighboring tiny island of Japan has no resources, no excuses, no hatred of Jews and Americans and the Wall Street and Capitalists, yet it has one of the most productive workforces and one of the highest standards of living in the world.

 

U.S. citizens, and partly due to the media age, overemphasize minor global interventions. People are relatively insecure about America's future prospects. Despite our fiscal issues, the economy has the largest GDP in the world, our military faces no global competition, and yet we're still so insecure.

The Country is youthful, emotional and it lacks a historical perspective. American dominance has only really existed in a unipolar sense since 1991. The country has come to dominate the international sphere.

When you look at our current foreign policy, it is obvious that our clear purpose post 9-11 was crippling regimes we deemed despotic. The list consisted of, or still does: Iraq, Afghanistan (Taliban), Syria, Sudan, Egypt, Yemen, Iran and Libya. The question is, does this list continue? We've drastically changed the course of events in Pakistan and are currently meddling in various situations in the Baltic.

For regimes like the Chinese & Russians; this makes them insecure. They fear that the Arab Spring could spill over into their countries; greatly hurting the legitimacy of the respective regimes. What is Russia doing with their dealings with Syria? They want to distract the U.S. so they can focus on their sphere of influence.

Without a Naval Power; they are a land base military force. Though unreported in the media, Russia recently had a conflict, the 2008 South Ossetia War. Despite the Fall of the Soviet Union, they still have power aspirations. Putin is shifting the country to a commodity exporter, really shifting away from any sort of industrial growth. But ultimately, the U.S. power is unchecked at this point, which is a cause for concern.

But Russia does not care about some inoperable base in Tartus, Syria. They're more concerned with their two OBJECTIVES- Ukraine and Belaruse. Anyway to distract the U.S. is the goal of the Soviets. While the U.S. will concede on the two respective neighboring nations, we have long feared the establishment of a bilateral relationship between Russia & Germany. Just imagine is you combined Russia's manpower and natural resources with German's technological innovation. This was the entire point of the EU, to force Germany to not be an aggressor towards France and in the region.

What is our foreign Policy based on? It's not on the egalitarian principles of peace, justice or democracy. Our entire foreign policy is predicated on causing instability in various segments of the world to assure no threat to our dominance emerges. We've always been highly suspicious of Pan-Arabism, fearing the reestablishment of the Caliphite. The best way to deter this is to establish nations that will emphasize regional sovereignty and defend it to the death. Ultimately, its the fundamental point that to have a modern economy, the U.S. must be a part of it.

 

Well??????

who made money???? im dying to know!!!!

 

you might not know, any nation does have a right to indulge in its resources a little, but this doesn't give anyone a right to prey on it.

the Japs is a greedy bunch, the Fukusima disaster is a glaring example of how stupid they can get when blinded by greed they had built a nukeplant in a seismically dangerous area.

 

Honestly I don't see a point. Doctors make money off patients, that does not make doctors responsible for patients getting sick. Auto mechanics make money off motorists when their cars break down, that does not mean auto mechanics break cars. Abu asked a very dumb question to begin with.

 

I may disagree with you on almost everything but here at least we sing from the same hymn sheet. These conspiracy theorists like Jack are something else. He's even got to the stage where he believes I'm an American just because I use the letter "z" instead of "s" in the spelling of certain words. Conspiracy theorists are akin to amateur detectives.

 

It's your resources, do whatever the f*ck you want with them, last I checked your country sells them at market prices, just like the rest of the world does.

But if your country makes bad deals or if the proceeds end up in the pockets of your corrupt politicians, criminals or the mafia (they are the same people aren't they) - it's your own fault, blame your own corrupt culture, your own system of government, your own slavish people, not the Jews and the Wall street.

LOL, I just love it when the Russians criticize the Japs. You wanna be "generous", you don't want to "greedy" like the Japanese, you don't want to work as hard as the Japanese - these are your choices and stop blaming others for your miserable lot in life.

 

come on... it is already clear to everyone that USA policy is to grab other's natural resources by whatever means.

 

thanks.

none of your business.

do have a right to be lazy.

 

Again, when do a series of 'coincidences' stop being coincidence, and who tells us when it is no longer such, but something more, Gilos?

Who do we all wait on, on edge, to be told what the 'official line' is?

Please.

Is ALL of this, just some .....coincidence..

And this is just a tiny part....

Lewis M. Eisenberg (born 1942) is an American business financier and investor, with entrepreneurial roots known for co-founding and heading a private equity firm, Granite Capital International Group L.P. Lewis Eisenberg has a multi-decade history in American political fundraising circles and is most notable for the various national, state, and bi-state appointments he held throughout his career, specifically as the Chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey at the time of the September 11, 2001 .

Eisenberg began his career on Wall Street after completing his education at Cornell University. He began working for Goldman Sachs & Company .


And here is Larry Silversteins 'mate', Frank Lowy...

Wow....what a shock....a former Haganah terrorist.

Must ALL be a coincidence, I am sure...

And, would you credit it.....Marvin Pierce Bush was on the board of directors of Securacom from 1993-2000, which maintained security for the World Trade Center Towers up until September 11, 2001.


Go find out which company operated out of the 16th and 17th floors, of the North Tower.

I will save you the bother - Zim American Israel Shipping. That is the name of the company that operated out of those floors.

Broke their lease, weeks before 911, and opted to pay a $50k fine.

The company is owned by Zim Israel Navigation - which just so happens...to be owned by the Gov of Israel.


For a terrible event, that Zionist, Netenyahu shamefully went on to claim was 'GOOD FOR ISRAEL', there seems to be an awful lot of...billionaire Zionists, who just so happened to, in one way or another, be just kinda milling around...

 

Let's try the Sherlock Holmes method...deduction.

Was it....Muslims? No.

Was it...American people? No.

Was it....Larry Silverstein? Yes.

Was it...the arms industry? Yes.

Was it criminal banks, who are really financial terrorists? Yes.

Any others...

 

They are not just blind, they can see.....but only down the way.

Hence, you will some chimp in a low paid job (just about to be turfed on welfare next year)...taking a general swipe at people on welfare.

It is easier for them, I think, to let off steam at those not usually able to have a voice to defend themselves.

Easier than looking UP the way, at criminal bankers, for example.

Wrong.

But easier.

And the stupid like things that are easier.

 

Weeeeelll.. I think they both fall pretty much under the same category. In fact, no matter what religion you want to talk about, you're much more likely to find blind faith in the lower classes of society than the upper classes, and especially within a church organisation. There, they know what they're doing.