Not All Muslims Are Terrorists

What happened hundreds of years ago can be debated back and forth and scholars spend their entire academic careers trying to decipher the history of that period hundreds of years ago...........but it does not take a scholar or any knowledge of ancient history to see what is happening right here and right now.....muslim terrorists are going around the world killing people in the name of the moon god allah

http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-kills.htm

 

Yeah, that guy you're responding to should be called the real European socialist for his views on things do show one that is somewhat deranged if not a fully blown psychotic, and for him to say the media is run equally by the left and the right just shows you how debilitated his decaying mind has become. How does the world come up with these demented characters

 

Video of Muslim woman being whipped.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqYjk7mXJ2E

 

allah the moon god

http://www.bing.com/search?q=allah+the+moon+god&form=BIE9DF&pc=BIE9&src=IE-SearchBox

 

allah the moon god

http://www.bing.com/search?q=allah+the+moon+god&form=BIE9DF&pc=BIE9&src=IE-SearchBox

 

On the contrary. Anders Brevik, The Covenant, The Sword, and the Arm of the Lord (CSA), Army of God (AOG), the NLFT in india who shot and killed Shanti Tripura in 2000, Scott Roeder who killed an abortion doctor because he believe abortion to be criminal and immoral(I wonder where he got that idea?), 14 traditionalist shamans that were killed in Peru in 2011(The murders were allegedly committed by, and/or at the behest of, the local mayor and a group of other evangelical Christians), Hutaree was a Christian militia group based in Adrian, Michigan, James Kopp who was associated with "the lamb's of christ", Eric Robert Rudolph who bombed an abortion clinic, and the list goes on and on and on.

So do you still want to hold that position that christians don't terrorize today like they did in the past? I hope you see that they are still terrorizing..............all in the name of their god; a christian god.

 

The Bangladeshi student was not a real terrorist but he was trolling the Internet forums and he posted some incriminating stuff about bomb-making and the FBI launched a sting operation and an agent approached him posing as a fellow jihadist and he ended up participating in the fake bombing plot organised by the FBI. It's doubtful if he could pull it off on him own without outside help but this case highlighted how difficult it is to screen international students in the visa application process.

 

Who said anything about proportions???? Is that your way to keep from accepting what The Real American Thinker said? Do you have to twist his words and meanings in order to justify your position? You guys don't want to acknowledge, AT ALL, the christian terrorism that happens today. Just look at the response I just wrote to ex-lib. He said that christians don't terrorize like they did 200 years ago.

Regardless if Ex-lib was talking about christians not terrorizing "at all" or "just occasionally" doesn't matter. Because if a christian terrorizes just once in the name of their god, this is the same as a muslim terrorizing in the name of his god. They are both done in the name of their respective god.

So, pointing out that christians terrorize, all in the name of their god, just like muslims do..............has nothing to do with proportions. We are not pointing out that christians are on par with muslims, quantitatively, we are just correcting you guys wrong idea that christians don't terrorize at all.

 

Try to read up. It will help us think you are intelligent enough to discuss things................that you should know about before trying to discuss them; at least in depth.

Allah (English pronunciation: /ˈælə/ or /ˈɑːlə/; Arabic: الله‎ Allāh, IPA: [ʔɑlˈlɑː] ( listen), [ʔalˤˈlˤɑː]) is a word for God. In Arabic, the word means simply "the God."[1][2][3] It is used mainly by Muslims,[4] Arab Christians, and often, albeit not exclusively, by Bahá'ís, Arabic-speakers, Indonesian, Malaysian and Maltese Christians, Mizrahi Jews and Sikhs.[5][6][7]

If you claim that Allah is not god...............that's like claiming "la puerta" is not "a door", when in fact its the name for "a door" in Spanish.

 

heh heh....You suggest I read up......when obviously you did not even read the posted link in regards to the topic....or you did not comprehend it......again...............

The pre-Islamic origin of "Allah"

There is absolutely no question that Allah was worshipped by the pagan Arabs as one of many polytheistic gods.
Allah was worshipped in the Kabah at Mecca before Muhammad was born. Muhammad merely proclaimed a god the Meccans were already familiar with. The pagan Arabs never accused Muhammad of preaching a different Allah than the one they already worshipped.
Many scholars say "Allah" is derived from a compound Arabic word, AL + ILAH = Allah. "Ilah" in Arabic is "God" and "Al" in Arabic is a definite article like our word "the". So from an English equivalent "Allah" comes from "The + God". Others, like Arthur Jeffery say, "The common theory is that it is formed from ilah, the common word for a god, and the article al-; thus al-ilah, the god," becomes Allah, "God." This theory, however, is untenable. In fact, the name is one of the words borrowed into the language in pre-Islamic times from Aramaic." (Islam: Muhammad and His Religion, Arthur Jeffery, 1958, p 85)
Although "Allah" has become known as the proper name for the Muslim god, Allah is not a name, but a descriptor that means literally, "the god". All pagan cultures have these generic terms that refer to their "top god" as "the god". In comparison to the perfect monotheism of Judaism and Christianity, "Allah" was originally no more a proper name for the Muslim God, than the word Hebrew "elohim" (god) or Greek "theos" (god) are proper names of the one true God of the Bible. "Jehovah" is the only revealed proper name for the "Elohim" of the Old Testament ( Ex 3:13; 6:3) and "Jesus" is the only revealed proper name of "Theos" in the New Testament. (Acts 4:12) Islam has no proper name for their god, but merely transformed, by universal use and confusion, the generic Allah into a proper name. So although today, Muslims use "Allah" as a proper name, it was never used this way originally. Allah, therefore is equivalent to "elohim" and "ho theos" but not "Jehovah" or "Jesus". Allah is not the name of the nameless Muslim God. However Muslims will claim that Allah is the name of God that corresponds to Jehovah. Both the Father and the Son are called "ho theos" (The God). Jesus is called "The God" many times in the New Testament: John 20:28; Heb 1:8. An important conclusion from this, is that the mere fact that "Allah" is equivalent to "elohim" and "ho theos" does not mean they are directly corresponded. It certainly doesn't prove Allah is the same as the God of the Old or New Testament. It does not prove that Muslim's worship the same God as Christians. If this correspondence proved the Muslim god was the same as the Christian God, then because pagan religions also have generics that correspond to "the god" (Allah), this correspondence would also prove that Allah is the same god as the Buddhist god, for Buddhists also refer to their god as "the god".

 

Allah Is Not The God of The Holy Bible


http://www.kingmessiahproject.com/is_allah_not_God.html

 

You just defeated yourself. You tube has plenty of good substance reports . This is one of them. Leave it to an Islamapologist to play the invalidation card because he can't refute the content. Doesn't matter what form reports come in. It's the content that counts. I notice you don't dare approach that, as cowards rarely do.

Invalidation is hard-wired into Islamapologists.

 

If marauding Muslims had not gone on 477 years of murderous rampage all over southern Europe, north Africa, and Asia Minor, there would not have been any Crusades. Only question is what took those Crusaders so long to act ?

 

No, because numbers isn't what makes a world caliphate. Money and political influence > power do that.

 

He was right. It is an oxymoron. Koran = radical. Koran = Muslim. Muslim = radical. Get it ?

 

It shouldn't be a factor in immigration policy because it should be banned in America, as a violation of the Constitution and Sedition law. In fact it already is banned by those things. It's just not being enforced (like illegal aliens jumping the Mexican border fence, not being arrested for that crime).

 

To equate Islam with Christianity is idiocy. And to say Islam has had far less extremists than Christians is even worse idiocy.
Up to 1905 when most of the European lands that had become Muslim were liberated, Muslims had killed 270 Million innocent people. 120 Million Africans. 80 million Hindus, 60 Million Christians, and 10 Million Buddhists. No religion, nation, or cult even comes close to that horrific figure. All those Muslim marauders were extremists, because Islam itself (the Koran) is extreme.

 

Denouncing violence publicly (while endorsing it privately) isn't enough. They need to reform the Koran. Christians reformed their bible twice (OT to NT, and the Reformation). Muslims need to step up.

 

Don't be ridiculous. Muslims have perpetrated almost 20,000 violent attacks since 9/11, and would have done many more if defenses were not as strong as they are. Whatever Christian terrorism there is, it is negligible compared to Islamic.

 

The diseased mind of an Islamist, diseased by Islam. That's who we're talking to here. Nut case Muslims.

 

OF COURSE we would hold that position. No matter how many names you come up with, it's a drop in the bucket of Islamic terrorism, which would destroy the whole world with nuclear weapons, if they could get them to create a worldwide caliphate (Islamic state)

 

One wonders why students are given visas at all. Or workers. Or anyone, whose skills aren't critically needed here.

 

Why ? What's the point of doing that ? Just about anything occurs in some very small quantity. It's when they occur in very large quantities (like Muslim jihad) that they become relevant.

 

I'm not a bloody Muslim.

 

there are so many different ways for the supposed correct spelling of quaran and al quaida. At this point I couldnt care less. I get the message across, thats all that matters.

they arent being loud enough, until they are, its their responsability. I get body checked every time I cross the border like a ccommon criminal, thanks terrorists.