Lesbian woman demands double standard when she has sex with 15-year-old

So. . .you really believe that a woman, 18 + 1 day should be sued as a sexual predator for having sex with another person (whether it be a male or female) who is a schoolmate, but a woman 18 - 1 day would be okay in exactly the same situation?

Shouldn't the law be LOGICAL?

There is a HUGE difference between a 40 year old exploiting a 15 year old high school student, and an 18 year old schoolmate experimenting with that 15 year old classmate!

 

I just can't figure out why someone would be so lacking in perspective, imagination and intellectual capacity that his entire worldview is made up of what legislators put down on paper. There's a world of difference between a 40 year old and an 18 year old, even if the statutes treat both of them the same.

 

I believe the case of your friend is excessive. . .but it is also different from the case in the OP. A TEACHER having sex with a student has an "authority" element that enter into play.

Two classmates, even with a 3 year difference, do not have that "authority" element.

 

A 15 year old high school student is HARDLY a "young" child!

And a 18 year old classmate is hardly an "adult!"

 

Have to agree here . I think the law needs to be logical as well .... A couple that was 15 and 17 are legal till the 17 year old turns 18 , then they become illegal ...or at least the " adult" does . Don't really know what the law should actually be though .

 

I would also expect the law to take into account the report made by the 15 year old and NOT just the complaint of the parents!

A 15 year old can "divorce" her parents in many states (I must admit I do not know the Florida law re: this subject), so whether the relationship was consensual or not, and whether it had begun prior to the 18 year old reaching that age should matter.

 

It is a difficult line to draw in the sand......a good many factors should be taken into account. I know that in my high school several guys slept with female teachers........I don't think they were scared for life.....in fact, all the guys were very envious. Two teenagers entering into consensual sex is very difficult, for me, to see as a criminal act......but what if she were 19 or 20 instead of 18 and not a classmate?.......discretion.....which we don't seem to exercise anymore.....is pretty key to these type of cases....I'm like you.....I don't have the answers here.

 

Indeed, you must have an active imagination to ignore the core concepts of equal under the law. What you are suggesting is some are only quasi-adults, to fit your needs or desires...

 

In a perfect world subjective judgment would always reach the right conclusion in each individual case. However, we do not live in a perfect world. We live in a world which requires the administration of justice on an objective basis. This approach produces rough justice for the masses. That's the best that can be done by society.

 

I guess I expect more from our justice system.

And I believe that in this case, we will.

By the way, I'm not sure if the picture of this 18 year old "sex offender" was posted yet, but here it is.



Don't know about you. . .but it sure doesn't look like a middle age priest using his post of authority to sexually abuse a young teenager or a child!

 

Well dude...I answered his question. Its more like you are trying to dodge the answer. Start reading a bit better.

 

You don't realize it, but your example supports me. We have a "line in the sand" which determines whether a not a person is drunk. Is a .079 BAC all that significantly different from .080? Nope, but there's your line in the sand. In my state, you are guilty of aggrevated speeding at 21 MPH (or greater) above the limit. Is speeding by 20 MPH significantly different than speeding at 21 MPH? Nope, but there's your "line in the sand" where the laws are concerned.

So given your examples, the "line in the sand" law recognizes that scenario 1 involves a drunk guy engaging in aggrevated speeding, in scenario 2, neither of those things is the case. So yeah, they're going to be treated differently.

 

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression we were talking about something that happened in the State of Florida within the past few months, not something that happened thousands of years ago and thousands of miles away.

 

The accused has admitted the relationship was sexual in nature and took place when they were 18 and 14. The alleged victim is now 15, the accused is still 18.

 

The fact that you have to misrepresent (deliberately?) the facts of the situation says an awful lot. It was an 18 year old doing a lot more than "going out with" a 14 year old.

 

Except the family of the alleged victim, in their only public statement, are claiming it was not consensual. So that may certainly be explaining why neither they nor the prosecutor are so quick to dismiss the case summarily.

 

The circumstances seem clear enough to prosecute. An adult admitted having sex with a 14 year old.

 

Then why can a 40 y/o legally drink but a 18 y/o cannot?

- - - Updated - - -

A 23 y/o can legally purchase alcohol. This obviously opens the door to giving it to the 17 y/o and having more than one law broken. There is no analogy.

 

Thank you very much. I'm glad and gratified that you share my aversion to the destructive passions of homosexuals and that this pedophile should be punished under the full weight of the law. I do not have opinions, I am right.

 

That IS what we would say if it were a man who committed this heinous crime, why would the preception be different if the perpetrator is a lesbian pervert predator.

 

I like how you accuse me of misrepresenting (deliberately?) yet you say the girl is 14 even though the article says 15.

You people with your faux outrage need to mind your own business.

Just to satisfy my own curiosity, is there anyone here that is wants equal rights for homosexuals AND is outraged that an 18 year old girl would dare put her hands on a 15 year old girl in a sexual manner.

The key to this issue is the girl/girl factor, not the 18/15 factor.

lol

 

The woman, who is 18, is a sexual pervert preditor pedophile who got her jollies at the expense of a 15 year old girl. Satutory rape at the very least.

 

14 year old

 

Alcohol is a controlled substance in which states, albeit forced by the federal government, have enacted laws that require an age of 21 to purchase. In no way does that lessen adult responsibilities of 18 year olds. Two totally separate things.

 

This is what the article says : Kaitlyn Hunt, 18, was expelled from Sebastian River High School in Sebastian, Fla., this year after she was charged with two felony counts following the discovery of her relationship with a 15-year-old.

I was going by that.