~ MOD ALERT ~ Iran's response to Israel's latest threats

Iran's centuries-old policy of non-aggression must not be interpreted as its inability to defend itself," Seifi said. "The Israeli prime minister had better not even think about attacking Iran, let alone planning for that."

He reiterated Iran's readiness to engage in "meaningful, time-bound and result-oriented negotiations" and "to ensure that its nuclear program will continue to remain exclusively peaceful."

Earlier, Iran's foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, said Netanyahu's nature was "to lie."

"Over the past 22 years ... Israel has been saying Iran will have nuclear arms in six months," said Zarif, speaking in New York in an interview broadcast on Iranian state TV. "The continuation of this game, in fact, is based on lying, deception, incitement and harassment."


****


Thoughts?

 

Right now some people are talking about the money we borrowed from China and because of it how China could control the U.S.

WRONG.

Lending 101.

Never lend money to any person, group or COUNTRY that you have absolutely no possible way to force payment upon those loans.

AboveAlpha

 

The only wars with Canada are like when MY BRUINS kicked a bit of ass a few years ago....although I am still irked about last year....damn Blackhawks!

AboveAlpha

 

Celine Dione is our secret weapon. You put her on a sonic loud speaker, have her sing the Titanic song, and millions have their heads explode. We could use it one day so no one should mess with our North.

 

Not from you Jack.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/irans-nuclear-bomb-program-complete/

 

Comment on the topic please.

 

Actually Israel was built on liberty and equality, but it did in fact survive Arab warmongering as the Muslims attempted to push the Jews into the sea headed by the Nazi Mufti of Jerusalem whose policy of genocide against the Jews was and is the same as that of Mohammad and all Muslims who faithfully follow a literal interpretation of the Koran and/or the Hadiths.

 

Lol.

Come on man, stop this.

It's not healthy or real.

 

There is no "e" at the end of Dion. It's Celine Dion, not Dione...

 

He might not have commented, but that link speaks of a "source" that says their nuclear weapons program is complete. Now, a little bit of disclaimer info: WND is a far-right, judeo-christian newspaper that like most "Americans" of their ilk are pure "Zionist"-shills. That said, a nuclear Iran is most certainly a game changer even from my perspective.

I formerly could have cared less, because I didn't think the Iranian State could pose a threat to the American Empire, but a nuclear Iran with its Anti-West thesis threatens every European country on the continent. If these reports are true, then I'd have a demand of Iran: Either accept the Russian-Brazilian deal of 2010, or risk American bombardment.

After what we've seen North Korea do, I simply won't allow an antagonistic nuclear state to exist, and I will even supercede the U.N and International Law itself to make that guarantee.

 

You know...I BELIEVE THIS!!!!

Damn her...DAMN HER TO HELL!!!!

AboveAlpha

 

.

I thought Mr. Netanyahu's "jeans and music" gaff he made recently towards
young Iranians was very amusing. And very convincing that he knows very
little about the everyday life of Iranians. They have been wearing jeans
for many years as well as listening to western music. He has a one track
mind... "Get those settlements built !!!" ..... Whoops !!!... I mean "Bomb Iran !!!"




see here ---

http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/diplomania/.premium-1.550873


.

 

I have been sent to this are of the word several times and I hate the damn area.

Netanyahu....is simply trying to protect his country by garnishing U.S. Support.

Now....the U.S. and the U.S. Military is at such a power level that there is very little any country could do if we decided to actually decided to do something.

Iran....Syria....etc....are problems that we could END within a day or two....but we have decided to make certain we look like the good guy's.

AboveAlpha

 

.



You and Nutanyahoo are on the same sheet of music. Good for you.

 

You are making an ASSUMPTION.

I have been asked to mediate issues by several sides of this conflict and I and my team were asked BY NAME as all sides knew we would come to a just an unbiased decision.

I do not take sides.

The ONLY side I take is the United States of America's.....the last best hope for mankind.

AboveAlpha

 

Not true. The United Nations has demanded that Iran not build nuclear weapons and has sanctioned them repeatedly for trying. It won't just be Israel bombing Iran to keep them from starting WW III by selling nuclear weapons to terrorist groups. Many countries will be party to that preemptive move.


United Nations Security Council Resolution 1696 – passed on 31 July 2006. Demanded that Iran suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and threatened sanctions.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737 – passed on 23 December 2006 in response to the proliferation risks presented by the Iranian nuclear program and, in this context, by Iran's continuing failure to meet the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors and to comply with the provisions of Security Council resolution 1696 (2006). Made mandatory for Iran to suspend enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and cooperate with the IAEA, imposed sanctions banning the supply of nuclear-related materials and technology, and froze the assets of key individuals and companies related to the program.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1747 – passed on 24 March 2007. Imposed an arms embargo and expanded the freeze on Iranian assets.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1803 – passed on 3 March 2008. Extended the asset freezes and called upon states to monitor the activities of Iranian banks, inspect Iranian ships and aircraft, and to monitor the movement of individuals involved with the program through their territory.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1835 – Passed in 2008.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929 – passed on 9 June 2010. Banned Iran from participating in any activities related to ballistic missiles, tightened the arms embargo, travel bans on individuals involved with the program, froze the funds and assets of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, and recommended that states inspect Iranian cargo, prohibit the servicing of Iranian vessels involved in prohibited activities, prevent the provision of financial services used for sensitive nuclear activities, closely watch Iranian individuals and entities when dealing with them, prohibit the opening of Iranian banks on their territory and prevent Iranian banks from entering into relationship with their banks if it might contribute to the nuclear program, and prevent financial institutions operating in their territory from opening offices and accounts in Iran.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1984 – passed on 9 June 2011. This resolution extended the mandate of the panel of experts that supports the Iran Sanctions Committee for one year.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 2049 – passed on 7 June 2012. Renewed the mandate of the Iran Sanctions Committee’s Panel of Experts for 13 months.

 

It's a shame we care more about international opinion than we do about our own safety. Iran is already making nuclear weapons. In fact, they tested three so far in North Korea. But America will sit quietly by until Iran sells some to Al Qaeda, Hamas, or just drops one in Tel Aviv themselves. Then suddenly USA will have to answer to why they let that happen. Those stupid sanctions clearly aren't working. Three decades of sanctions already and nothing is dissuading them from working towards full scale nuclear weapon production.

 

Lol.

What a joke.

- - - Updated - - -

No.

That is just a lie that you are repeating.

Prove it.

Or you are a troll.

 

It makes you wonder what planet are some people here on. Almighty saves us all from Americans saving us...

 

Planet ZOG?

 

So the Mufti must also have been in control of the UK, as it supplied most of the Arab armies, and as has already been established, the Arab Legion was commanded by British officers.

And I suppose Israel wasn't built on stolen Palestinian lands...

 

First of all, as I have already pointed out, the UN Security Council is not ''the world.''

Secondly, none of what you have listed even mentions ''nuclear weapons.''

''The world'' does not want to verify that Iran is not building nuclear weapons, because there is no evidence whatsoever that they are.

 

Let me simplify this by parsing out the important words for you to read: " suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities ". And ask someone to explain to you how the general assembly makes resolution requests to the security council; since clearly you can't grasp that either. Personally, I think you are just trolling and baiting people; but maybe it's possible you just don't understand the words used in UN resolutions or how the UN works in general.

 

Originally Posted by Snappo

"It's a shame we care more about international opinion than we do about our own safety. Iran is already making nuclear weapons. In fact, they tested three so far in North Korea. But America will sit quietly by until Iran sells some to Al Qaeda, Hamas, or just drops one in Tel Aviv themselves. Then suddenly USA will have to answer to why they let that happen. Those stupid sanctions clearly aren't working. Three decades of sanctions already and nothing is dissuading them from working towards full scale nuclear weapon production."


Second time.

Prove it or you are spreading a known lie.

 

That's true. China couldn't force the US to pay back their loans, BUT China could stop doing business with the US. Albeit that wouldn't hurt anyone more than China itself. They need to keep their people employed and fed.
No, that doesn't make sense.
IF China only gets promissory notes from the US, then what good are those to them except for trading back for American goods? But apparently the US buys more from China than vice verso, and so the promissory notes keep piling up.
Do I have it somewhat right?

Another thing: We think the US is going down the tube.
Truth: Not a chance!!!
Look here who is the biggest military might in the world...

China spends only about 1/4 of what the US spends on their military apparatus. And Russia spends a wee bit over 1/8. Even Russia and China together would still only make 3/8 of America's military expenditures...not even half yet.

I notice, Israel, the supposedly third mightiest Nation, is not mentioned. I wonder why? Could it be that their share is included in the portion for the United States? We know they get their weapons regularly upgraded by the US. That's perhaps why the US looks so big in spending... they buy for Israel as well.
Do I have that right??

An interesting link, worth taking a closer look:
http://niloufarparsi.wordpress.com/tag/israeli-warmongers/