Bad News for Republicans

Voter fraud and a RINO running for President is the reason we lost 2008. If Palin was running, it might have been a different story.

- - - Updated - - -

Democrats are the KKK... 'nuff said.

 

Make no bones about it, BHO also campaigned in what? 58? 57? 56 states!!! But Sarah Palin is the stupid one right?

 

Okay lets start with voter fruad do you have proof? Nope. Had Palin run on here own it would have been a landslide we both know that. Palin is nothing more than a religious nut (Iraq: "We are doing God's work") that caters to the worst of America. She cant even run her own house hold much less finish a job she started.

 

I really appreciate this post. I've been of the same mindset for such a long time, now. Having a party system pretty much guarantees bias and communal thought. Instead of individuals, we have zombies just going along for the ride, towing the party line. It happens all the time, and once you finally send someone to Washington who might stand out as an individual, he/she eventually gets absorbed into the hive-mind and is finally corrupted. The only people that seem to have been immune to this, in recent years, were Senator Lieberman and Senator Ron Paul. I'm hopeful for some of the Tea Party guys, like Cruz, Lee & Paul, but time will tell.

Then you have the constituents... How many people have you met that are Republicans or Democrats, because they come from a Republican or Democratic family - lifetime Dems/Repubs? Too many, if you ask me... They don't even know what they're voting for... they just vote that way, because they've always voted that way or knew to vote that way.

If you got rid of the party system, you'd also be getting rid of media and university bias (for the majority). Sure, they could still espouse their socialist beliefs/thoughts, but they wouldn't be able to influence your vote as a whole.

Definitely agree with this, but I'm skeptical of it ever happening. The parties have too much power and too much money backing them.

 

"Whore," you wrote . . . and yet the claim from leftwingers is that they are not being misogynistic towards Palin . . . yet they would NEVER have proclaimed John McCain a media whore as an opening political salvo. If it walks, talks, and writes like a misogynist, then it is one. Yes, even if it is also -- gasp! -- a leftwinger.

 

KevinVA is LITERALLY the KK...'nuff said.

Since I said 'nuff said, that makes my argument just as valid as yours, right?

 

Media whore is a term that respects no gender.
Your post reflects the same lack of education that Palin does.

 

Yep, but you gotta respect Obama for finding voting states that don't actually exist -- because after all the media respected him . . . and they are never wrong -- except that they usually are wrong whenever they enthusiastically climb on board a media bandwagon like they did back in 2008 as they blatantly campaigned for the Anointed One.

 

Yet no leftwinger would use that term in regards to, say, Nancy Pelosi or Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama or . . . and leftwingers would not use the term as a first resort for most male politicians of either party, period . . . and yet look how easily it came to mind when posting about a strong Republican woman.

 

That right? Why did ACORN close down, then? Why are there a couple of videos and several pictures of the Black Panther Party attempting to suppress votes and speaking out against whitey?

 

She started her career trying to cobble together a degree from a multitude of institutions all to get a job as a sportscaster to get in front of a camera.
She continues on the same path in spite of the humiliation of constantly displaying her educational shortcomings.
She is, has been and always will be a media whore.

 

Yeah, you don't want to have to research all of that irrefutable evidence... since you'd be proven wrong, because no evidence exists. Oops.

 

You must be old, your memory is gone.
But find where I say anything he's done is ok with me.

 

There's plenty of proof for voter fraud, you guys just don't like looking at the evidence. I posted several links just the other day and no one read them. Wasted effort on my part. Palin would have crushed Obama, just like she made Biden look like an idiot in the VP debates.

 

Cuz balance budget is a pie in the sky talking point. And limited means what?

 

There's that Romney landslide thinking everyone who isn't a right winger likes to laugh at.

 

So basically, religion is an institution which drives people to do good.

Oh the atrocity!

 

You know better.

 

Your reading this all wrong. Considering the Tea Party accounts for 11%, people want the rest of the rhinos out and replaced with good representation like the Tea Party!

 

Apparently you missed the sarcasm in my post... which was in response to someone saying the Tea Party is the KKK without the robes. 'nuff said wasn't a validation of my comment... it was used to portray that robes need not be mentioned for it to be true that Dems are the KKK...

The Democrats founded the KKK and they're still running the KKK.

Now I'll just brace myself for the Dixiecrat argument, while remembering the late Senator Byrd and David Duke - both modern-day Democrats.

 

Go ahead... I'll wait. Pull up that video of Palin, I mean Tina Fey, saying that she can see Russia from her house.

 

Apparently I did, so I apologize for that. You were right to call him out for that stupid remark with a sarcastic retort.

"The Democrats"? Who are "The Democrats"? Was the KKK created by the Democratic Party, or was it created by a bunch of racist Southern Democrats? There is a pretty stark difference.

They are?! And here I thought that the vast majority of KKK members, neo-Nazis, and racists had a much more right leaning philosophy. Silly me, huh?

Well, I don't know what argument you're referring to, but I do know that while many southern racists used to be Democrats in the distant past, that certainly changed around the time the Civil Rights Act passed. Senator Byrd used to be a KKK member and founder, you're correct. Did you know that he also repudiated that position long ago? Oh, and if you didn't know, David Duke changed to the Republicans in the 80s.

 

LOL, what's good for the goose surely isn't good for the gander..... The KKK is a right invention that they celebrate today unless its of course proven that the KKK was an invent of a Democrat, then it's a "RIGHT WING democrat". You people slay me!

 

You are forgiven.

I'll agree with you here. Not all Democrats are racist. I'll also go one step further, not all racists are Democrats. It is, however, indisputable that the KKK was founded by Democrats. The KKK would attack/hang Republicans (in general), in addition to black people.

Well, I guess you were incorrect, as neo-NAZIs mimic the National Socialist German Workers Party... which is a Leftist regime.

I don't buy it... he ran as a Democrat for public office in 1975, 1979 & 1988. Then he changed his political affiliation.

Yet he keeps endorsing and aiding Democrats... http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/21/david-duke-endorses-leading-new-york-democrat/

 

Here is a tip of the iceburg starter kit.

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalin/a/palin-top-10.htm