Voter Supression Law Gets Green Light

The president does not make these decisions , and I am acutely aware that the stupid, lazy, uneducated, and poor are mass producing like bunnies because they have the IQ of a retard. Suppressing their vote is crucial to a lasting America.

 

the point is who won

talking about stupid

what you wrote is funny, considering how many republicans vote against their own interests

 

1. The point is your point is off topic and not related to anything being discussed. Who won the `98 Rose bowl ?

2. Dont know what republicans have to do with anything, another off topic and nonsensical post... unless of course you think that only democrats are stupid and uneducated...

 

really, you think presidential elections aren't part of the 'voter suppression' issue?

you're obviously in deep denial, republicans are trying to suppress voting

[video=youtube;8GBAsFwPglw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw[/video]

 

1. Silly billy, who won the last two presidential elections are completely irrelevant. I know you still got the tingle crawling up your leg but use some self control my friend !

2. The only thing I am in denial over is thinking that I will get a sensible conversation out of this.


We need to get rid of the poor, dumb, lazy, and uneducated vote.

 

that's just not true

you claims are what's nonsensical

of course you don't understand the constitution and declaration of independence

 

1. Of course its true, evident by how you have no way to explain why the 2008 election is relevant to the current topic.

2. Sure, keep telling yourself that.

3. We need to get rid of the poor, dumb, lazy, and uneducated vote.

 

What is non-sense is the belief that Americans can't get up off their asses to go get an I.D. card, go register to vote, and then go vote. That is the non-sense.

 

The nonsense is the fact that the right makes it about ID. That has never been what it is about. That's the "real" nonsense that you would have us believe. That it is about ID.,so all these other laws that have nothing to do with voter fraud are injected into the mix.

 

You have to show an ID to get a loan, board an airplane, and whole host of other things. Why should the duty of voting be any different. No ID and no address verification opens the whole process to voter fraud. That must not happen. By the right, I assume you mean real Americans.

 

Lying again, Agent. There is no voter suppresion law so there can scarcely be a green light. There is a voter fraud suppression effort that terrifies people like you. My god, what happens to the leftist if dead people, foreign nationals, and deadbeats paid to vote are not allowed to vote. What if liberals can't vote more than once or go to nursing home to coerce the elderly into signing already completed absentee ballots. What if people in perfectly safe liberal states aren't allowed to fly to battlefield states and go vote without a prior registration. Disaster for the left.

So, AG Eric Holder files suit and Agent lies and whines endlessly.

Here's to a relatively honest election in a few months.

 

Great post. I'd like to take it a step further though. Disclaimer: I'm assuming that people without a valid ID are a statistically insignificant % of the voting population. I may be wrong here, I haven't seen any numbers one way or the other...

Now, with that assumption in mind why would the GOP push for a law that really has no effect on legal voters? And why would the democrats rail against it so vehemently?

 

You are avoiding my point, as most of you do. Again, it has nothing to do with ID. It has nothing to do with ID. It has nothing to do with ID. Do I need to repeat this again? The ID issue is a front for voter suppression laws, which have nothing to do with voter ID. fraud. The suppression laws are the real impediment to voting. The new voter ID. laws are just being used to convince people that is the real issue when it isn't. The issue is to make it harder for people like minorities to vote, so as to impose "OTHER" voter suppression laws. How hard is that to understand that you avoid answering my post, while locked in your own tunnel vision thinking with voter ID, while being too scared to address the real issue? Again, ID isn't the issue. Voter suppression laws are.

 

You aren't making sense as usual. Eliminating same day registration is on the first Tuesday of November. How does eliminating that stop voter fraud?

 

If these aren't voter suppression laws, then what are they; http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/...o-block-north-carolina-voter-suppression-law/ ?
Here's to a relatively honest election in a few months.[/QUOTE]

 

That's the question they can't answer.

 

If a person was born into poverty, went to school, graduated at the age of eighteen, but was still living in poverty at no fault of their own, what is your logical reason for that person not having the right to vote?

 

Bias inherited from his lazy parents

 

That's what I figured. Poor excuse, tainted with your own ignorance and hate. ! If your parents were well off and vote for a particular party, I could say the same of you voting with your parents with bias. Doesn't mean you are on the right side of the aisle. Your excuse confirmed my suspicions.

 

Where in the constitution does it say I must show ID to vote?? Pray tell

 

Where does it say that you don't have to?

 

Now Liberals reference to the Constitution? Well, to be precise it doesn't. It'd be one of those 'pesky' 10th Amendment things, it should be delegated to the States or to the people. But we know how much you hate that, so you should create a National Law.

Isn't anyone noticing the hypocrisy from Liberals? States aren't allowed jurisdiction in their own States, but neither will the Democrats enable National Law. This is because, generally speaking I don't think Democrats see us as a Country or a Union. Hence, we're reprived of our rights(See: UN-Arizona lawsuit)

Liberals are engaging in the same King George tactics.

 

how many times do i have to say that there are lots of people that don't take out loans, fly or a whole host of other things

quite a few of those people were voting many decades before you were born and they have every right to vote

i'm a moderate and i often reference citizens' constitutional right to vote

because they showed that they weren't responsible enough to respect voting rights

 

No its the hypocrisy of Republicans who only like the laws that benefit them. that it end of file and if it does not watch out they cry.

 

Here's a simple solution: Enact NATL.Law, such as FMR.Pres Bill Clinton's proposal to link Social Security with the ID Law. That should enable everyone, including the poor the ability to vote, while protecting from Voter Fraud.

Yet if his proposal were tabled, it'd likely be labeled "discrimination", which at this point is an excuse. Just like Democratic failures to deal with the border results in excuses. In 6 years, all you've accomplished is a very lobsided piece of legislation(ACA) and some hand-wringing.

Bush was terrible, but he'd also be an upgrade over this.