Anti LGBT Mindset: Why are YOU against gay rights? READ MOD WARNING IN OP BEFORE POST

No we don't you are dead wrong and I can prove it. If the lgbt was monolithic it would include me and it doesn't Thus it can't be. All I have to find is one exception.

You think paranoid delusions are healthy? by all means hold that belief.

I have already proven that they don't. So you can lie to your self all you wish, but I am going to keep calling you on it.

Straightforward or not, it's not relevant.

Are you a supporter of his? He seems dead set on stomping out industry. but it is apparently your opinion that only ignorant people can be leaders of industry.

- - - Updated - - -

No, not to bull(*)(*)(*)(*)ters.

Courts can't do that. the first amendment protects religion. So understanding that the courts can not make such orders, the first and fourteenth amendment cannot be in conflict.

Explain the legal precedent the court would use to do such.

 

So, IOW, you don't have a coherent argument. Okay.

 

Yes it is leaving people be. The gay people that are wanting state recognition on their marriages DON'T CARE about having to get licensed by the government. The one who seems to care is YOU, which your thoughts on the matter of government involvement for someone else is irrelevant to them.

They want to be left alone by people such as yourself and after SSM is legalized they finally will be in regards to marriage.

 

Dont confuse your inability to comprehend with me not making a coherent argument.

 

Yeah, they just want the benefits. And them not caring about the government licensing and regulating their relationship doesnt change the fact that the government is in fact licensing and regulating their relationship.

 

Well considering that heterosexuals do the SAME THING, are you saying all heterosexuals want to get married for is the benefits?

Again, YOU are the one that has a problem with the licensing. So are you married? Did you get licensed and if so why? I guess since you didn't care about the licensing and went through with it that means you just wanted the benefits right?

 

Well, make a coherent argument . . . all you've done so far is make silly allegations. I thought you were going to go the route of "now we have to accept incestual marriage and maybe even pedophilia" like so many of you anti-SSM'ers do? Now, you've decided to go the route of "they just want to have benefits . . ." So what if they did want to get married for the benefits? What business of it is yours? Plenty of heterosexual people do the same. Some might marry for money or whatever. The point is that homosexuals are human beings, and, as the constitution states, have the right to to the pursuit of happiness. If they want to be married, who are you to tell them no?

 

You're wasting your time Brother Chris. I don't even deal with that sort of nonsense any more.

 

Brother? I'm not a brother, but I know what you're saying.

 

So are ANY TWO CONSENTING ADULTS who would wish to be married. Nothing special about those who happen to be homosexual.

 

Why should there be? If they are adults and they both are consenting, why should they not be able to be married? Do you have any GOOD reason?

 

LOL. I don't mean a brother as in a brother. I'm not a brother either. Just brothers in the quest for sanity and social justice.

 

No, I'm a woman, so I would be a sister.

 

OK than sista!

 

The laws in all 50 states. And in the states with gay marriage, equality isn't their concern and it is instead an effort to win more respect and dignity for gays. In the states without gay marriage, equality isn't the concern and it is instead an effort to improve the well being of children that only heterosexual couples produce.

 

Oh puleeze! That is such bull. Homosexuals just want to be recognized as human beings who are treated just like anyone else, I'm sure. Just out of curiosity, are you a religious person?

 

I wasn't referring to what homosexuals want and was instead referring to what the courts creating this right to gay marriage want.

 

And how do you know what they want? Homosexuals would have a choice to be married or not, just like anyone else. The courts would be forcing nothing on them, just giving them an option.

- - - Updated - - -

So, this is funny. You're trying to make it sound as if you're concerned about the homosexuals getting screwed over by the government because they might have the right to be married like straight people? This argument makes zero sense.

 

I can read what they write in their decisions. For instance you vehemnetly deny that its
an effort to win more respect and dignity for gays. From the California case

 

So? What if it is? Is there something wrong with wanting respect and dignity? Or is that only the case if you're gay? If they are both adults and both consenting to marriage, there is really no good reason to deny them.

 

That would apply to ANY two consenting adults, not just the ones who happen to be gay.

 

Are you a conservative?

 

Giving a couple the exact same rights as another couple is equal, not inequal.

That is going to continue being true no matter how many moronic posts you make otherwise.

- - - Updated - - -

That's not how constitutional law works. As the courts keep pointing out, you must demonstrate a governmental interest served by the DENIAL of marriage to same sex couples.

 

But we know you're not making a coherent argument. All of your points have been demolished.

- - - Updated - - -

Strawman. Nobody said they're special.

This isn't an argument.