Court clears Planned Parenthood, indicts its accusers

Yep, the BENGHAZI syndrome in real time.

 

No masquerading involved. They ARE a clinic for the poor. I went when I was young. And poor. Most of their clientele are unable to afford to go anywhere else. All those of us who have insurance don't need Planned Parenthood. They are there for those who can't afford to go anywhere else.

Yes, thank you. I went there for an abortion when I was nineteen, pregnant and scared. My sister had just given birth the year before, when she was nineteen. What's with all the spread legs, you say? Maybe you didn't know this. Probably not. But childhood molestation survivors have a tendency towards promiscuity. I know that's a big word. Here's your definition.

the fact or state of being promiscuous.
"some fear this will lead to greater sexual promiscuity among teens"
synonyms: licentiousness, wantonness, immorality; informal sleeping around, sluttishness, whorishness; dated 'looseness'
"the promiscuity associated with the sixties and seventies"

Aside from all that, the only necessary logic inherent is "It's none of your business." None. It doesn't matter if you're the father-to-be, you don't get to interfere with a woman's sovereign rights over her own body.

 

Please,please, tell me you didn't ask that question? Let me answer the question this way, seeing that I'm not exactly sure I believe someone actually asked me that question. If PP was caught on tape selling fetal tissue, how come the two who were taping them, were the one's indicted? Please, take your time and think about your answer, because I'm afraid your answer is going to be as crazy as your question.

 

Most of the Women's Health Care work done by "Planned Parenthood" is about things like contraception and prenatal care …

But … You self-righteous creep …

DON'T ... LECTURE .. ME … ABOUT … "ABORTION" … !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am the father of four children -- a birth daughter, an adopted daughter, an adopted son, and a foster daughter …
All together, they have now given me fully twelve beautiful healthy grandchildren, from age 2 up to 24 … and number thirteen is due in April …

But I lost one grandchild years ago to an early abortion that was necessary to save the life of the mother …
The embryo was so young, (s)he was never named and we don't know what her/his gender was …

I … LOVE … ADORE … TREASURE … all of my grandchildren, including that nameless one I have never met …

So get OFF your self-righteous high horse and get REAL ...

 

David was the one who got snagged purchasing the body parts, in order to frame PP. That is a Class A misdemeanor. Read the article.

 

I don't understand how the video makers can be charged for allegedly selling fetal organs, but PP cannot be for selling, when PP were going to be the buyers.

 

You're absolutely right.

You do not understand...anything about this

- - - Updated - - -

Thank you

 

Yes, lies. They are being indicted for it.

 

That's not true. Two Congressional investigations found there was no significant edits. The actual content is correct and forwards exactly the disgusting acts of Planned Parenthood. Those that made the tapes were only indicted because they secretly taped without permission, not because what they produced was inaccurate.

 

The two facing charges are charged with lying to investigators and obstructing Justice.

Ya know...basic dishonesty...like their videos.

 

They are being indicted for not getting permission to tape. The actual content is truthful.

 

Heavily edited

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

 

Factcheck.org is hardly a credible site. It's a left wing opinion site.

However, even your link confirms that the 100% unedited versions were released. They are hours long, try watching them. I did, and it's disgusting.

 

I just might add that investigations in both Indiana and Texas, both fairly red states, have cleared PP of wrongdoing.If Republican-dominated states clear investigations like California or New York would, advocates for these videos are really only throwing a temper tantrum.

 

It was already found inaccurate by the many states who did investigate and found no wrongdoing.

DO try and keep up.

 

The "actual content" included a stillborn baby purported to be an aborted fetus.

It wasn't of course.

 

No it wasn't. They released the unedited versions concurrently. Only the left wing political hacks tried to declare that. You guys are simply not telling the truth or ignorant to the truth.

 

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*) !!!!! Just another smear attempts by Republicans apparently the courts think otherwise. Plus this is a very conservative state that is filing the charges. I still am confused by the right to life crowd they scream about the unborn but many of them wont adopt

 

So you don't deny that a gun-totin', two-steppin', (*)(*)(*)(*)-kickin', goat-ropin', Ted Cruz lovin', abortion-hatin' Texas grand jury looked at those very same videos and decided to indict the lyin' propagandist for soliciting the sale of fetal body parts and NOT Planned Parenthood for offering to make the sale?

I do loves me the sight of forced-birther heads exploding from cognitive dissonance induced vapor lock...

[video=youtube;C0iBwm491zs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0iBwm491zs[/video]

 

If David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt were indicted on the count of prohibition of the purchase of human organs, then why wasn't the seller (PP in this case) also indicted?????

If there is a buyer, then there must be a seller and in this case the video/audio clearly showed that the PP personnel wanted to sell.

The extreme left-wing DA and their biased grand jury were out to get David and Sandra and had no intentions in indicting the real criminals in this case which was PP.

Shame of the rogue DA and their tampered grand jury.

 

David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt were indicted on the count of prohibition of the purchase of human organs, yet PP (the seller) weren't indicted.

If there is a buyer, then there must be a seller and in this case the video/audio clearly showed that the PP personnel wanted to sell.

Illegally selling fetal tissue is a crime.

The extreme left-wing DA and their biased grand jury were out to get David and Sandra and had no intentions in indicting the real criminals in this case which was PP.

Shame of the rogue DA and their tampered grand jury.

- - - Updated - - -

So, the buyer got indicted, but the seller (PP) did not get indicted? Really?

If there is a buyer, then there must be a seller and in this case the video/audio clearly showed that the PP personnel wanted to sell.

Illegally selling fetal tissue is a crime.

The extreme left-wing DA and their biased grand jury were out to get David and Sandra and had no intentions in indicting the real criminals in this case which was PP.

Shame of the rogue DA and their tampered grand jury.

- - - Updated - - -

Name calling is against forum rules.

NO!!!!

 

Texas is Conservative, but Harris County is not.

In both 2008 and 2012, Harris County went to Obama.

So, this makes this indictment more suspicious.

 

Harris County is not conservative.

In both 2008 and 2012, Harris County went to Obama.

Next time, know what the hell you are talking about.

 

Let's reverse roles.

Let's say there was an anti-gun group that went undercover with a hidden camera into a legitimate gun store.

The anti-gun group secretly recorded the gun dealer and continually asked to purchase weapons under the table with cash and no background checks (which is illegal).

The gun dealer talked about the selling of weapons for cash and without background checks and how he was going to buy expensive cars.

Eventually, the anti-gun group released these videos.

The left would have had an orgasm and used these videos to show how crooked ALL gun dealers are.

Then a grand jury in a conservative county found that the gun dealer didn't do anything wrong, yet they found that the anti-gun group committed serval crimes.

So, the DA from this conservative county indicted the people from the anti-gun group.

What would you think of that decision????

 

Wait, let me see if I got this straight: You expect me to believe that you became promiscuous because you were sexually violated? Do you realize what an absurd statement that is? If I were sexually violated, I would actually you know be AFRAID of having sex. So while you tout your high horn about me not knowing what "promiscuity" is(I think every decently competent person knows what it is), allow me to demonstrate some rather simple facts.

Yes, you have domain over your body. No, that doesn't include the fetus(I only give the exception in the case of Medical Abortion. Which aligns me with most conservatives and even deep blue Liberals). Why? Here's an analogy: A hotel(or rent). The owner may charge the person whatever for rent, he may install whatever rules or regulations he sees fit. What he CANNOT do however is violate that person's basic human rights, under the guise that the
tenant is his property.

The exact same argument used for abortion, with the same exact flaws. The womb is a part of, yet entirely separate from the female body. You can make all of the decisions you want pertaining to sex, but making the decision of a life-or-death status of a child is the greatest hypocrisy in the West.

A hypocrisy only "stabilized" through its demand. In other words, if we got the entire female species to the point where abortions weren't necessary, no one would argue for them. When the best thing you can say for a procedure is that it might sometimes be a "necessary evil", morality beckons us to find much better solutions to the problem.