Trump tells Matthews "women deserve some type of punishment for abortions"

the punishment should be some type of private for profit reeducation camp so that they can be taught how to take responsibility for their kids instead of aborting them, or having them for welfare.

they will gain work skills at these camps so their kids could have better lives than they did, and this wouldn't cost the taxpayer anything because they will pay back their debt for training to the reeducation camp business.

trump is an intelligent business man.

 

If something is illegal, there has to be a penalty if you do it, correct?

What am I missing?

 

I just read the OP. Do realize the question was a gotcha by Matthews?
Chris set him up. Told him the law changed and should the woman get punished should she break a new law. Trump said yes.

 

bozo wannabe got nailed by his own bs which Chris dangled before the combover creep, it's over!

 

Over? Not at all.

If abortion is illegal there certainly needs to be a punishment for breaking a law. Correct?
We just forgot how to think even at skin deep level.
Everything is surface thinking and emotional.

Now that Cruz is the next to fall down, it would be interesting to see how Trump would handle Kasich.

And then a landslide victory over Hillary.
I think everyone knows that would be the case once Trump is nominated.

 

Watching the trump campaign trying to spin this is hysterical.

They're all over the news flipping and flopping like a fresh caught salmon.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, that's right...double-down.

You should absolutely go around suggesting that women should be punished for exercising their private health rights.

Scream it from the rooftops that you support trump punishing women...don't stop, whatever you do....lmao.

 

I would have told Matthews that I would answer his question if he answered mine: Do you think women who poison their babies in the womb during their pregnancy (with opiates or cocaine) should be punished?

 

OK.

PS: The TRUTH = A Trump nomination would be suicide for the GOP. It would cost them the Senate and put the House in jeopardy. That is why everyone, with a brain, in the GOP is working so hard to deny Trump and avert a disaster in November.

 

No, no, no ... please do not misunderstand.

Women can do whatever they do.
This is their business.

However, if something becomes illegal (including abortion) there is also a penalty attached to anything that is illegal.
Later on Trump said that the doctors would be liable to be penalized and not women ... the way it was before Roe vs Wade.

Originally he said "women" because Matthews trapped him. He was jumping in in about every sentence.

 

and when he answered, yes, then what, just ignore it and typically say a lot of wordish nonsense?

 

GOP is corrupt and hijacked by Establishment (I call then warmongers).
DEMs are also hijacked by eliminating the Conservative DEMS and making it a purely Liberal party that is also managed by the Establishment.
Warmongers are running the show for the last 50 of so years.

Let them both crash and see what happens.

 

If he said yes, I would ask him what happened to his "bodily autonomy" principle?

 

there are laws on the books, while Dumpy wouldn't even know what you're talking about

 

Matthews is a jag off. Most people understand he does stuff like that to people. Him and Katie Couric.

Pure bozo.

 

Dumpboi crumbled in Chris's lap over nothing!
yeah, that's the Trumplodyte's big bad Presidential contender pretender! a total wussie!

 

So there are laws to punish giving the fetus a dose of heroin, but it is legal to give it lethal doses of other drugs, and/or scrape it out? How is that consistent? Wouldn't it be double jeopardy to charge a woman with two different crimes for the same act of ingesting illegal drugs?

If there are laws against it, I think very few women, if any, are being punished for it. Especially considering that 100K+ babies are born addicted to drugs per year. What's with the lack of prosecutions? I have an idea that prosecutors are reluctant to press charges because Roe v Wade gives women "bodily autonomy".

 

If the question was inappropriate or not worth answering (and reporters do this stuff all the time)...then why didn't he handle it?

The problem with trump is that he can't handle himself. He doesn't really understand what he's talking about and it shows.

Then as soon as the interview is over and he starts taking heat...he sends out his troop of spinners and tries to back up at 100 miles an hour.

 

jeopardizing an infant is pathetic, damaging is worse and the laws should be addresses humanely

 

He did handle it and tried avoiding it 20 different ways.
Matthews was relentless and demanded the answer. If reporter demands the answer one must give it to him otherwise it does not look good for the candidate.

Most of the time when Trump makes controversial statements he makes them on purpose.
The reason he makes them on purpose is because people as a whole are not used to thinking that way and quickly react (as in this case as well) at the appearance of a statement and not the substance.
However, what he says is indeed a truth ... as in this case as well ... if something is illegal then there must also be a penalty.

The reason he changed "women" to "doctors" was not because saying "women" was politically incorrect, but because before Roe vs Wade the doctors were liable and not the patients.

What Trump does is he says inconvenient truth ... people react because it sounds odd since no one said that before aloud ... and when dust settles, people see what he said is a true statement.

 

So then a woman doesn't have bodily autonomy when she has a baby in the womb? Because one can do many things to jeopardize an infant, including things done to it in the womb.

 

he changed it drastically because he knew the last 20% of his female supporters were in jeopardy of ditching him, he's disfavored by everybody but moronic white punks

 

Although I do not think Trump grasps the moral issues surrounding abortion, I agree with his answer. If the procedure was banned, there would have to be a punishment. That's not an extreme position.

 

Please understand that a certain type of women would never vote for Trump even if he walks on water.
And there are also A LOT of women that despise Hillary Clinton.

 

lmfao. Um, no.

What trump does is actually repeat stupidity over and over that is almost always fallacious. He then engages in a lot of inflammatory rhetoric to inflame and radicalize his base who won't hold him accountable for his stupidity.

For instance, when asked about policy on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, trump went on about deals. How its a hard deal but he's going to make a good deal...it will be hard to make a good deal but he can make good deals.

That's how he tries to answer all questions because when he's forced to give actual data and specific, he falls apart. The only thing he actually seems to do well consistently is bash women and minorities.

To suggest that trump says anything worthwhile is simply nonsense. He dumbs down dumb statements and its becoming increasingly clear that he's clueless...he doesn't actually have a viewpoint, unless its about fighting with someone. Otherwise, he just talks out of his ass and its becoming more and more obvious.

If you want to put your chips in for this dbag, knock yourself out. At the end of the day, trump supporters are going to suffer the humiliation of a lifetime.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm a female Sander's supporter...so are all of my friends...but none of us would have an issue with voting for Hillary to ensure the GOP gets no-where near the White House.

Democrats won't have any issue uniting around a candidate...and the GOP is helping with that very nicely.

 

Trumps repeats one thing 20 different ways.
And there is a reason for it - he is not a speaker, he is a communicator.
This is how he is promoting his points.

Does anyone remember what Cruz says? Rubio? Jeb?
No. They are speakers and not communicators.
Everyone remembers what Trump says because he ingrains it in peoples' minds.

Your example on policy between Israel and Palestine.
There is no policy. There cannot be a policy.
If anyone would say there is a policy, it is a lie.
If anyone would volunteer details, it is a lie.
The way reporters are asking about Israel/Palestine situation and details and policy is a wrong question.

Ever wondered why AIPAC Jews would not vote for Trump while they know very well that Trump is a buddy with Netanyahu and very much pro-Israel?
Some Jews (mainly in Israel) want peace talks, since the bombs are falling on their heads. They want peace.
Some Jews (mainly in U.S.) do not want peace talks. They want destruction of Palestine, since the bombs are not falling on their heads and war is great business.
This is Establishment - the warmongers.

So, Ted Cruz says to AIPAC - we will always be against Palestine! (He actually said "be with Israel").
They LOVED HIM - it means no peace talks and more war.

Trump said - we need to have peace talks and be objective.
AIPAC did not like that, since they want war.
ISRAEL PEOPLE however, love Trump, since they are tired of wars.
Complicated.

Trump does not bash women.
He treats women the SAME way he treats men.
He also pays them the same ... unlike every politician (including Hillary). Her female staffers get paid less for the same job her male staffers are doing.

Trump does not bash minorities.
He treats minorities the SAME way he treats everyone else.
If you are good at what you do - you get paid regardless of you race, nationality, gender and sexual orientation.
And unlike top tier politicians, he actually follows it in his business.

He is the least racist individual you would meet in your life.
He just looks WHITE.

Thanks,
Ed