Things White Nationalist Don't Know About Crime in Communities

Yes they were immediately threatened.

A man brandishing a gun at the police while committing a crime is by definition a threat.

A mail person on a regular route sees the same people all the time but still will not know them all cops cannot know everyone you are wrong

- - - Updated - - -

YEs they most certainly did he was committing a crime and armed

 

Example? Besides even if you can find an example they aren't holding it in a threatening way. Not only that he doesn't have the right to hold a gun in his hand and threaten people with it.

How would you do it without endangering the lives of others?

 

Get serious. You can't hold him responsible for what his forefathers did. How stupid are YOU? And who do you think you are, coming here to preach and insult others. You have NOTHING to "tell" other people, about ANYthing.

 

What does this have to do with "white nationalists?"

 

Gad, arrogant much?

 

You have to have no interest in an honest rendering of the facts if anything you have seen looked the least bit threatening. Indeed, the police didn't even say he was.

And, btw, I am not in favor of open carry, regardless. Look how it didn't even apply to black children in Cleveland who had a toy gun. The notion that anyone can see the execution of Tamir Rice and not acknowledge that is not okay, and can never happen again, merely shows how badly the BLM movement is needed.

 

Forefathers that are alive are being let off the hook. So spare me the garbage.

Too many living people literally owe living black people for too numerous things to count.

You don't want to litigate that, then fine. You don't want or pay reparations, then fine.

But then you have to be willing to do something to make up for the crimes. So saying, “its in the past!” is awfully convenient when you benefitted from the oppression and still benefit.

 

Every White nationalists in the world repeats the insane lie that blacks are in fact, and inherently, more criminal.

Yet, in my lifetime, the legion of crime against blacks by whites in the Jim Crow era, and in the penumbra of the Jim Crow era are more numerous than blacks could commit in five generations.

 

They did indeed say he was and they were proven correct.

The BLM movement is a hypocritical movement of terrorist sympathizers who do more harm than good

- - - Updated - - -

No one has said that blacks are inherently more criminal so you need to quote a specific example or it is a lame lie from you again

 

13% of the U.S. population is consistently committing 50 percent of serious crime. Purchase a freaking clue.

 

Considering you flee Everytime you're asked to support every claim you made in this thread, so are you.

 

Why would someone who comes from a self claimed Italian - Irish background want to pay Blacks reparations for some thing they, or their ancestors did not do?

 

purchase a freaking clue. In 1964 alone, in just the state of Mississippi, white people committed in the neighborhood at least 500,000 crimes against blacks.

So purchase a freaking clue, genius. Not letting someone who is eleigible to vote, register to vote, by whatever means that was done, is a crime. It is a violation of their constitutional rights. Ditto, for them not voting because they aren't registered, or they were cut with in the knife in the face to be an example to others. That is terrorism, assault, and a violation of their constitutional rights.

Whites have inflicted more harm and committed more crimes against blacks than they ever could against each other.

 

I benefited at their expense. And so did you.

Soooo, it is the right thing to do.

Imagine that.

 

So in the early 20th century when my Polish relatives arrived to the U.S.A the economy was still derived from Black slaves?

Oh really?

The industrial revolution made slavery not needed, and the industrial revolution is where the majority of our modern wealth has come from.

If anything Blacks with higher welfare needs than the rest of us, are more of a burden.

 

There were still black slaves in the early 20th century (and possibly some Polish ones too). Peonage, which was illegal was rarely enforced.

And, JIM CROW laws were in effect by then. So, yes, your white, filthy, smelly ancestors who couldn't speak a lick of English could pee inside in a beautiful room with new fancy toilet, meanwhile, the black woman who descendended from 10 generations of Americans, had to pee in a filthy, disgusting outhouse.

Yes, genius, you benefitted from that.

And why we ever let in ungrateful, racist, filthy scum from Poland is beyond me.

 

They didn't approach him with hostility until he refused to put the gun down. Furthermore, it is not reasonable to expect the officers to know who he was. You are objectively wrong, and completely unreasonable that it's laughable. Lol.

It's not ok to gun down harmless black people, but it was OK to shoot this guy, because he was a threat.

Your logic is just inherently bad. You purposefully leave out key details to create one liners, then feel you have made a point lolol.

 

50% of the serious crimes in this nation. Still waiting but don't see any clue purchasing going on. Sort of reflective of the last seven and three-quarters year. People with common sense have been waiting for Obama supporting leftists to stop rationalizing the fact that they twice put a nation-hater into the presidency. Still . . . waiting.

 

It is absolutely reasonable. They have zero excuses. He lived there, his wife lived there. He had a criminal record, so they should have salient information about him. There aren't too many residents for the police to get to know. If they didn't remember, or had never seen before, they still should have information on him from the running his tags.

The police are there to serve and protect ME. They aren't there to just serve and protect rich people and white people. So how can they serve me without knowing me?

 

It is completely unreasonable to expect them to know everyone in the city lolol. I'm glad your in unreasonableness is showing so blatantly, just in case anyone was taking you seriously lolol.

It is completely unreasonable think an officer should stop everything they are doing to research before confronting someone. There simply isn't enough time. And it's no excuse for uncooperativeness.

What is reasonable, is for him to comply. And he didn't. His death is on him.

And no one said police are for rich whites, that is your own racism projecting.

 

I guess if you consider international human rights violations and denying people their Unites States constitutional rights are not crimes, and if you consider failing to prosecute white people at anywhere near the same rate for the same behavior is OK, then you might have a point.

But since none of those things is OK, you don't.

 

They certainly can't be expected to know every newcomer and visitor. But, sorry, a long time resident of the community it is perfectly reasonable, and I, as a citizen, demand it.

People who do not think black lives matter probably do not think police should know they people that they are theoretically serving.

That is why they have this movement, to drum it into your skulls that having high expectations for the police is their right at citizens.

 

It is objectively unreasonable to expect police to know everyone in the community. There are literally hundreds of thousands of people. Police are not walking data bases. It is OK to demand high standards, but not unreasonable standards. Which is what you are doing.

And to those whom are stuck in the past and just looking for blood for sins of the past, committed by those of the past I'm sure blm seem reasonable, but they are an objectively hypocritical organization who doesn't at all represent the values they claim, and who's narrative has been destroyed by facts and logic. It's literally a terrorist organization that will accomplish very little other than splitting races up.

Thier goals are simply to place blame on others for issues that are overwelmingly thier fault.

 

And yet, the mailperson usually does. How is that so easy for them but magically not “reasonable” for police?

 

Your posts are utterly ridiculous. They don't merit any kind of response other than to point out they are being laughed at. Please tell me they are supposed to be funny.