Things White Nationalist Don't Know About Crime in Communities

Yes, they could have reasonably known. They were community cops. He lived in the community. He had a license plate which could easily identify him. He had a record. And there was no urgency to act WITHOUT sufficient information.

 

The statistics you claim show Jews having high crime rates than non-jews.

Why do I need to walk you through this like you're a child?

 

No it does not mean that even in an open carry state.

He was not executed.

The shooting was justified

 

If we just included those two nights, the crime rate for Jews was higher than the crime rate for Germans for virtually the entire prewar period. But those were not the only two nights Jews were accused of committing crimes. It wasn't even close.

But you keep pretending Nazi Germans were less criminal than German Jews, in reality.

 

Political crimes are not murder and robbery.

Do you have any evidence that Jews in nazi Germany had higher rates of murder, rape, robbery, etc?

Do you have any actual statistics beside your guesses which show annual Jewish crime rates were higher than non-jews rates?

 

I'm sorry, I didn't know rioting, inciting rioting, and destruction of property were political crimes.

Also, how many blacks were convicted of raping blacks in the 1950s?

What was the rate of convictions of blacks for murdering blacks in the 1950s?

 

Who mentioned anything about Jewish on Jewish crime?

Do you have some learning disability?

Do you have German crime statistics from the 1930's, or did you just make a thread based on a claim you didn't bother to investigate beforehand?

 

You can look them up yourself. If you think more than ten percent of adult Germans (6,700,000 people) were arrested and charged with crimes over the entirety of prewar Nazi Germany, then you are clueless.

And given you clearly have some misguided, odd admiration of Nazi Germany, it really won't matter what stats I provided.

 

Are you braindead?

First of all, you are making a claim without a shred of evidence. I'm not looking something up because I didn't make the claim. I'm not doing your homework for you. Do your own research instead of me having to walk you through something like a child.

Secondly, I'm *disputing* your claim that Jews were viewed as more homicidal, or street crime prone than non-Jews in either statistics or public perception.

If you have a few brain cells to stump together, that means I'm not pretending non-Jewish Germans were less criminal than Jews.

Are you capable of basic logic?

 

Many high ranking Nazi Germans looked rather Mediterranean looking including Goebbels, Eichmann, Heydrich, Hitler, and Hess.

Any of them could pass as Jews, heck Eichmann even looked stereotypical Jewish.

 

In case you haven't noticed, I couldn't care less if you don't take this for granted.

I have no interest in discussing anything with people who are already that deluded.

 

Wow!

Too bad for you Trump won't be able to assemble Storm Troopers for you to join.

- - - Updated - - -

Wow!

Too bad for you Trump won't be able to assemble Storm Troopers for you to join.

 

So how come high ranking Nazi Germans were very Mediterranean looking by German standards?

Mediterranean peoples seem to be much more aggressive than Whites, it just happens to be that Mediterranean DNA spikes up into Western Europe too.

England, and Germany are more Mediterranean by DNA, than are other Northern Europeans, so it's no wonder why they behaved the way the they did.

 

To expect them to look at someone, immediately know who they are and what mental ailments they have is not a reasonable thing. LOL. Your hatred of police has forced you off the deep end. Police are not walking databases lol. Nor does running a license plate come up w/ any immediate mental status changes. Nor does that make any difference when they see the person w/ a gun and now have to deal w/ that immediately. To ask them to "back off" is also unreasonable, as it is their job to confront. Were they to back off and he kill himself, people would blame police. Were they to back off and he opens fire on officers and kills them or opens fire on civilians and kills them people would blame police. They are damned if they do and damned if they dont. The reasonable thing for them to do is confront him, and demand he comply with their lawful orders (which they were lawful) and if he does everyone gets to come out just fine. He didnt, so he caused his own death.

You are simply irrational when it comes to police. You should bow out and let rational people whom are overly emotional discuss these issues lol.

 

Who said anything about immediate?

They had plenty of time to go get police gear put on. So why didn't they find out who he was?

And its not the least bit unreasonable. Do you think the mail person doesn't know who he is?

 

Its absolutely unreasonable to let a person who is a possible threat just sit there while you go "prepare". You are objectively wrong here lol.

Should they leave, go back to the station and get an armored vehicle before coming back to address the person? No lol. They approached him to speak with him which is not unreasonable, observed a weapon at which point now they are involved in the situation, to expect them to leave is unreasonable. He simply should have complied with orders. His death was on him.

 

A man with a gun in an open carry state, who is rolling a joint is a possible threat?

If they believe that then they are poorly trained.

And we are back to square one.

And why didn't they know he had TBI?

 

No, but a man carrying a gun in his hand that refuses to put it down when told to IS a threat. This difference is something you cant quite come to terms with yet. But it is a fact.

They didnt know he had TBI because they are not walking data bases. You have the benefit of hindset. But what you expect of them is unreasonable.

 

Don't ask a man who is not a threat to put his gun down.

And sorry, they SHOULD know he had TBI. That is what community policing is all about.

 

To tell the man to put his gun down and him refuse, is a threat. This is fact.

To expect them to know he had TBI is not community policing lol and is completely unreasonable and unrealistic. Not that it matters really. You are as unreasonable as it gets. But this is why no reasonable debate can be had. But nonetheless I will combat stupid at every turn.

 

They were not immediately threatened, ergo, they had ZERO reasons for not being prepared. And it is not only reasonable that someone knows who he is (and/or who he wife is) it is unconscionable that they didn't. Indeed, again, most citizens have a mail person or two who know who they are

 

Deluded in what?

Your non existing evidence you claim shows Jews had higher violent crime rates in 1930s Germany?

 

This is just a bait thread by the bigoted Sharpton, anti-white/anti-police crowd. Just an attempt to incite more hatred.

 

Yes they were, non compliance is exactly an immediate threat lolol. You are so deluded.

To expect them to know him is still completely unreasonable.

 

They had no grounds for confronting him in a hostile manner, especially when they weren't prepared and didn't know who he was, and didn't know he had TBI.

Sorry, you can pretend it is OK to gun down harmless black people, but that won't make it OK.