Which means the FBI for some reason is lying. Why would the FBI lie? That is the question that demands answers. We can understand why the dems want to blame it on Russia, for with them the end justifies the means. I will leave it up to the people here who still have working brains to offer up why the FBI is lying. Yet the implications of the FBI lying is tremendous and it should worry the hell out of people who are concerned about the USA, our gov't. Now, I will post the video from Info Wars, which of course will immediately bring on Hillary people dismissing John McAfee, simply because he appears on Info Wars. Yet when you consider that MSM censors him by being in black out, John has to appear on non MSM outlets or he could never inform us of the FACTS. Which MSM does not want anyone to inform us of. So he is relegated to RT and Info Wars. Which of course can be easily dismissed by the "usual suspects", or those people who do not want anyone to know the truth, for it helps pres trump. Here, listen to an expert who knows the truth. Which BTW I have brought up here before on different threads to support by own thinking. Now given no trump hater will listen to what John says the important point is simple. Russia would never have used the hacking software, old, not updated, and Russia never leaves foot prints, 15 year old hackers do, not 35 year old hackers. And certainly not Russia. This has never been talked about by MSM. WHY is that? Question that critical minds will always ask, which too has its own worrisome implications. So, Russia did not hack the DNC, and the FBI and other intel are lying. This is much more concerning than if Russia had actually hacked the DNC. We are being deceived, lied to, with the help of MSM, which implies MSM is nothing more than propaganda outlets and the truth is being held from americans who use MSM, and who believe Comey. We seem to have a pit of treasonous bastards in DC, and given forces are trying to remove trump from office, WHO is the enemy here? Trump or the establishment in DC?
The FBI didn't even look at the server. They took the word of a private company hired by the DNC. How much illegal crap was on that server if the DNC didnt let the FBI look at it after it was hacked?
Psst: At the capital, the DNC is offering more free Kool-aid to all you "smart guys." Just in case you think you are losing your edge.
Although I can't take the word of infowars it's true that the FBI didn't do any forensic analysis of the DNC server, so I don't know what the basis of the claim that Russia hacked it is. Meanwhile, the guys at Wikileaks who actually got the data claim they know who gave it to them, and it wasn't from Russia. So that has always been a weak leak in the government's claim to me.
So now we have the FBI coming to investigative conclusions based in part on findings by a private company hired by the DNC.
Both sides are now claiming that Russia did not hack the DNC. Dovetailing nicely into blessed harmony.
One of a few top cyber security experts. http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...remlin-John-McAfee-Cyber-American-Obama-Trump https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/817234507065688065?lang=en
This has nothing to do with "sides." Facts are not partisan. The Intelligence agencies have concluded that Russia influenced the elecrion by hacking the DMV. Here's the elephant in the room, though. Somebody hacked the DNC. And no, it wasn't some lone wolf.
https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/817234507065688065?lang=en http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...remlin-John-McAfee-Cyber-American-Obama-Trump
Should we take your words vs. one of the top cyber security experts. What are qualifications of those who made their conclusions about the source of hacking not even looking at the DNC server? It is about cyber hacking.
I dont know what analyst in the FBI made that conclusion. I do however know who John McAfee is and he is on of the worlds foremost and respected experts on this subject. The bigger question is why do you take the word of a nameless FBI analyst over McAfee? It seems to me that you have blind faith in government.
Neither you nor the FBI knows who hacked the DNC. Some private company hired by the DNC told them. Maybe Podesta leaked the information himself for all we know.
Neither is the FBI. They never examined the server. They took the word of a private company hired by the DNC. Once again your blind faith in government authority is showing.
They're not my words. I'm simply reporting what the intelligence community says. McAfee is a great computer guy but so what? Totally irrelevant appeal to authority. There are many great computer guys in the CIA and FBI who are actively working on this investigation. Funny how you guys pick and choose when to claim "expert opinion." Too bad You can't listen to the experts on evolution and AGW.
Your deference to the FBI and CIA is also an appeal to authority. I dont know anything about the analysts at the FBI or the private contractors who looked at the server because the DNC wouldn't let the FBI look at it. But I do know who McAfee is and in the absence of any evidence that the FBI even looked at the servers Ill take his expertise over some unnamed analyst who is probably fresh out of school.
The U.S. intelligence community is a better authority than McAfee. You might as well cite the guy who started Facebook as your authority.
Why do you assume that? What track record are you basing that on? You have a blind faith in government it seems.
You need to cite the guy who told the FBI it was the Russians, since they never did get to look at this supposedly hacked server.
