So far it is only your words. Funny that you don't understand that it is you who is appealing to authority and mounting an ad hom. McAfee is not a great computer guy, he is one of top cyber security experts. Any half great, half so so computer guy who has enough common sense and basic knowledge knows that when DNC has "password" as password, and stores info on a computer connected to sexting no hacker is needed at all in order to open it, copy and give to wiki leaks.
The fact that the DNC refused to let the FBI look at the server should disqualify any other analysis. That **** would never ever fly in court. A jury wouldn't believe a word you have to say after that.
Wikileaks documents showed that the CIA has the software hack accounts making it appear the Russians did it. So on the bottomline there would be no way to tell if the Russians ever hack anyone, nor could Comey and the FBI have any way to know whether it was Russia, some with the CIA, or someone who has or hacked the CIA for these programs, meaning it could any country or anyone in the world wanting to make it look like Russia did it. However, the DNC was not hacked. It was a leak by a Sanders supporter who was a computer data entry staff member known to have the password as he used the same accounts. He was assassinated shortly after the story broke - and Assange offered a reward for the murderer. Why would Assange, who said from the start it was not the Russians, otherwise offer a reward for information leading to who assassinated (gunned down on the sidewalk) of a Sander's supporter with the passwords to the emails showing the DNC conspiring for Clinton and against Sanders?
So you guys have totally left reality with your claims about the FBI not investigating anything. Typical.
Comey is an attention whore hack with no reason to believe a word he says - the REAL reason why he always says he can't provide any evidence to back up anything he says.
ROFL. Indeed, not each third computer geek could have an interest to spend 20 minutes trying. Only a patient one could do it. I wonder what was it on Weiner's ---- "Weiner"?
You realize he didn't even know that until he read it in this thread 10 minutes ago. It isnt something you hear in the leftists echochamber eventhough that has been known since January. Now he is having a lot of cognitive dissonance because he had always assumed that the FBI did an analysis of the server and reached an independent conclusion. Getting people to make that fakae assumption is why the leftists echo-chamber never spends much time reminding people that the DNC refused to let the FBI analyze the server. That and the DNC refusal to give the FBI access also sounds as shady as all hell.
The DNC was exposed as a mishmash of corruption, lies, dirty tricks, cheating (their own people!), inept and ineffective leadership. It looks like they want to make the entire country get on their lose train.
So what ? McAfee is not a known liar and creator of false flags and false narratives either. The national intelligence service should be changed to national propaganda service.
Hey, it is not April 1 yet! What a thoroughly idiotic post. So, the FBI is now lying. Was the FBI lying when, right before the election, Comey said they were looking at more Hillary emails ? (and may have influenced the election?) (Comey later said they found nothing, but many people had early-voted by then). "dismissing John McAfee, simply because he appears on Info Wars." - um, yeah. When you traffic in made-up crap, sane people don't listen. Question - are you just trolling? Were you laughing as you typed? I actually hope so, because if you are serious, well,.....
That savvy DC Democrat insider Podesta's password was "password". Copies of the DNC files are probably scattered everywhere from Tierra Del Fuego to Minsk.
I couldn't agree more. The whole thing wreaks. First, Hillary, with her private server and zero security, takes a complete walk and then the suddenly THE RUSSIAN interference with the election & the Trump campaign become front page headlines (with no proof) and all the DNC dirty deads, the media feeding the Clinton campaign debate questions & Hillary's lies are buried. Logically, it just doesn't add up.
One of a few top cyber security experts. http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...remlin-John-McAfee-Cyber-American-Obama-Trump https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/817234507065688065?lang=en
Two very huge conclusions made here, and neither of them have any merit. 1. That the hack was only tied to the Russians via forensic evidence found on the hacked server. Thats beyond ridiculous. NO, no hacker who is trying to remain anonymous would leave traceable forensic evidence behind. But you assume that that is the only way they identified who did this. When in reality they were most likely identified thru good old fashion spying. Listening in on voice calls, watching text messages, intercepting emails from foreign countries (you didn't think the NSA was only listening in on our conversations when they got immunity did you?). 2. That John Mcaffee is even remotely relevant to the technologies used today to hack. McAffee has not been relevant in that space, outside of his investments in some startups, since the late 90's. He is nothing but a publicity hound, and from what is being written about him, somewhat unstable. Thru his own admissions he hasnt really been deeply into true computer security since the late 90's. Hell, he invests in startups (a few were security related), and somehow lost a reported $96 million dollars in doing so. So why would you even put a man with those credentials into the conversation. Oh yeah, cause thats the only people that will talk to Infowars. And Infowars.......Really ?
The FBI is full of , and led by, leftover Obamistas, is why they want to lie about it. Just like their ridiculous claims that Trump tower was NOT WIRETAPPED, when they used evidence from that very wiretap.
