Democrats will pay for being stuck on hate

Maybe the Dems can win in Australia. In the US, their base is crumbling.

 

I wonder why a certain poster feels the need to radically overstate Trumps achievements at this moment?

 

Supposedly is the key word. Dont believe everything youre being fed.

 

"Who ya gonna believe, me or your own eyes?"

 

Truth gets in the way of rhetoric, huh?

 

Because in reality Trump only has one real accomplishment which is his Supreme Court appointment. That of course and significantly lowering respect for the office of the presidency both at home and worldwide.

 

Sen. Corker, former Trump supporter.

 

Exactly.

 

President Trump understands that the majority of Americans are sick of the MSM and Democrats incessantly screaming "RACISTS!" at everyone. By getting Democrats and the MSM to start ranting it this early into the 2018 election season - meaning then soliciting violent protests and riots - by the time the elections get here once again middle America will vote Republican.

As in every election season, the Democratic Party and global elite's MSM WANT race-baiting riots and protests. President Trump is assisting them to do so by refusing to join in their race-baiting and white-shaming. By the time the 2018 elections arrive people will be sick of it. HOW STUPID can Democrats be to think advocating tearing down - literally criminally tearing down in criminal mob actions with Democrat police just watching - helps them win elections is just how stupid and self-involved the Democratic Party has become - and how radical it has run to the left literally promoting criminal conduct by mobs they create - mobs of young punks and spoiled brats.

President Trump is VERY wise to not allow the global elite's MSM, Democratic Party and Republican rinos to succeed in their demand that he join in their constant race-baiting and hatred of white people. This is also why he was the ONLY person who could have defeated Clinton, because he was the only candidate who would not allow the Democratic Party and globalist elite's MSM they own tell him what to say, which included to run an anti-American and white apologist campaign.

As a comparison, even when BLM started calling for police to be murdered and even when BLMs were assassinating police officers, not one time would ANY Democrat official, nor Clinton or Sanders, declare anything but 100% of BLM.

Most people are extra super stupid when it comes to understanding elections. It does not matter what Americans think in terms of elections. It ONLY matters what Americans who vote in the election think. Thus, general popularity polls don't matter.

 

You mean, who you gonna believe, me, or everyone else? Ha ha.

 

Not true, but denial noted. This is the real issue... regardless of how bad you'd like to change the subject.

 

Had to go back to April for that one huh?

 

Youre right... since April we've experienced the tearing down of statues and Charlottesville. No doubt the OUT OF TOUCH vote is much higher now. Thx for the reminder.

 

Statues celebrating the leaders of the confederacy are there by the consent of the victors only. Most were put up 50 or more years after the Civil War, and were put there to intimidate during the Jim Crow era. They shouldn't have been erected in the first place. The statures are a lie. Those men aren't heroes.

 

The majority of Americans in both parties reject the tearing down of historic art pieces. More voters for the Dems to lose.

 

Thank you so much for this. I was beginning to feel like the Lone Ranger, when it comes to being critical of Trump, but not hating him. I am very concerned about the direction Trump seems to be taking the country, and about how deeply pro-Russian interests seem to have infiltrated our government, at high levels. As a child of the Cold War, it bothers me to see so many dismiss or defend Russia's meddling. It is heartening to see that some Republicans are now expressing aloud the same things that have worried me, like Senator Bob Corker. He questioned Trump's stability and competence to do the job of President, as I have, and as you did in this post. If we can get rid of the team-sports mentality in politics and make it plain that concerns about the job he is doing isn't simply sour grapes about the election or hate, maybe we can move forward with a better dialogue about the direction of the country.

 

I strongly believe you will change your tune when the investigation is complete. That being said, I don't think any attempt to remove Trump from office will come from the Russian meddling, but more likely from financial crimes, that also present a conflict of interest and compromise him.

Do you honestly think dropping a bunch of missiles, not designed to destroy airstrips, so that planes launched from those same air strips the next day, accomplished anything? It didn't. It was done for dramatic effect, and basically nothing else. With Trump, everything seems to be about appearance, and nothing seems to be about substance.

Congress, passing a bipartisan sanctions bill on Russia, with an almost unanimous vote is not illegal. That is the body that makes laws, for Pete's sake. Trump had to sign it. There were only 2 votes in the Senate and 3 votes in the house against the bill, and make no mistake, Congress was limiting Trump's actions because they don't trust him to do the right thing. Isn't that a sorry state of affairs, when Congress doesn't trust the President to deal effectively with other countries?

You cannot point to any achievement Trump has made during his time in office, because there isn't one. He is critical of the very people that could give him a legislative win, critical of people he appointed to office, and critical of his own staff. His party has the White House, the Senate, the House, and the Supreme Court, yet has not been able to do a single thing he promised, other than sign some executive orders, most of which do absolutely nothing. That is not leadership, and it certainly isn't good enough for my country. You're welcome to your opinion, but we do not agree whatsoever.

 

Congress is the *legislative branch*. It has NO authority to regulate foreign relations, this is explicitly addressed in the US Constitution. It is in fact, wholly illegal. And the argument that Sanctions would fall under commerce is a very weak argument at best. No, sanctions(or non-sanctions) are entirely diplomatic and therefore, under the thumb of the Presidency.

But the existence of the Sanctions is not the worst part, the attempt to limit the President's authority in respect to the Sanctions, is an open and naked encroachment. This encroachment is also grossly illegal under the Constitution. It should not past Constitutional muster due to sheer power abuses by Congress.

This would be like if the Presidency had someone push in the Enabling Act. Had Trump had someone do that, you'd scream foul and rightly so. But when Congress violates the Separation of Branches, you find it defensible.

Donald Trump's existence does not permit Congress to violate the US Constitution, nor does it give justification for doing so. If the bill were challenged judicially, it would be ruled unconstitutional.

So, do you still wish to defend an Unconstitutional Law? Whereas Justice Kennedy could think of an "out" for the important ACA Clause, there is no "out" for this unlawful document. It's a cut and dry encroachment.

Apart from the naked power abuses from the Worst Congress in History, they have done nothing of substance whatsoever. The President deserves no blame for their failure to act on behalf of the American People. It seems to me, just as you're willing to excuse their lawbreaking, you're also willing to excuse their apathy towards their jobs.

It's a sad day when a Russian Politician points out that our OWN Congress is breaking its OWN laws.

 

Statues started being put up less than 5 years after the end of the Civil War.

Whoever believes vandalism and war against Confederate statues is a winning tactic for the Democratic Party is an idiot. This is another monster the Democratic Party has created they will not be able to control.

 

What it is, removing the statues, is the right thing for the victors to do.

 

If that's the case, the right thing was never to erect the statues in the first place. But now that they were erected, a symbolic meaning was attached to them and their removal would just cause, what had happened. There's no victory in that.

 

That's right, they shouldn't have been erected in the first place. And, unfortunately, the symbolic meaning that has become attached to them is a false narrative. They aren't war heroes. The purpose they fought for put this country in jeopardy, and cost 100,000's of lives.

 

Obama's America!


YOU WERE SAYING??? And these are not silly cartoons created by SJW working for a magazine! It was RIOTS Obama, the MSM and Liberals helped create and the MSM is worried by a few hundred KKK who when left to themselves actually don't do ****. But when you throw bottles at them it all goes down.

 

I know you'd like to get away with this........



...............but freedom loving Americans aren't going to let you and your KKK pals.

So you get this...........

 

Yes, me and my Jewish family just love the KKK. Seriously? Way to go throwing the stupid, "YOU'RE RACIST IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ME" card. Makes you more ignorant than the idiots worshiping a dead German psycho. And what makes you think in ANY possible way I'd approve your picture above, unless he deserved to be in cuffs....Is he in cuffs or did you just post a snuff photo? If that guy attacked the cop, yes, he deserved to be face down in the grass, just like if a white guy, asian, guy, indian guy, or purple guy attacked a cop or resisted arrest. But you knew that didn't you?

As long as people connect the KKK with Trump, then Obama has to be connected with ANTIFA and BLM, since they popped up on his watch and partly due to him supporting them, instead of SHUTTING them down and condemning their violence and racism like he should have. But Obama didn't get called out by the MSM for beating around the bush, did he?