Why are you locking your doors? Is it because your house is your house and you have a right to secure it and decide who gets to come in and what they do when they're inside?
It is when you believe that cultural acceptance of homosexual marriage will lead to some destruction of society.
I think the message that sanctuary cities send on following the law would suggest, ideological at least, that no laws should matter to people that don't agree with them. Of course you as a single citizen don't have the power to enact ideology so I wouldn't recommend testing your theory. Its really only an issue for government, and the subjective manner in which parts of government are being allowed to violation the Constitution. Congress is Constitutionally empowered to pass laws, states can challenge these laws in the correct venue but to outright refuse to follow them erodes the foundation of law our society is built on. It simply cannot be allowed, for anything.
Weakening the family is only one of the bad consequences of homosexual perversion Homosexuality itself is not acceptable to most Americans who want their childrent grow up normal rather than gay
The republican swamp rats in washington could send laws to trumps desk increasing punishment to santuary cities But we have a do-nothing congress
There is no link between homosexuality and the weakening of the family. Based on polling in 2017, a majority of Americans (62%) support same-sex marriage, while 32% oppose it.
Ok just when was he convicted for the crime of child molestation? You people keep forgetting the word "alleged" when you use the descriptor. Also if people disagree with homosexual behavior are they not Americans? Do they not have a right to their beliefs as much as anyone else? Are we not all humans and as such have a right to believe as we choose? I have always known since an early age, that when you start name calling you have already lost the argument.
Pew Research is a liberal pollster, don't make me laugh. They are good enough for Fox News. But, please, tell me about the poll you conducted at your baptist church.
Okay then I will. The term was first used in the scientific magazine called "Screw", a pornographic magazine: "The word homophobia first appeared in print in an article written for the May 23, 1969, edition of the American pornographic magazine Screw, in which the word was used to refer to heterosexual men's fear that others might think they are gay.[11]" So, before May 23, 1969, there was no such word as homophobia, there was no such thing as homophobia, and since the invention of the word "homophobia", not one person has been professionally diagnosed as homophobic, no one has been treated for homophobia, nobody has been cured of homophobia. What more proof do you need? Are they looking for a treatment or a cure? No. None of our founding fathers addressed the issue of homophobia in the Declaration of Independence, nor in the Constitution. Any mention of homophobia was left out of the bible. It doesn't appear in any peer-reviewed scientific periodicals before 1970. There is much disagreement about the term and what it even means. Many consider it a pejorative against homosexuals, while others consider it a pejorative against anti-gay, anti-GBLT persons. And I guess "sexologists" have decided there's no such thing as "heterophobia". So, if there is no such thing as "heterophobia", how is it there can be a "homophobia"?
Gay Marriage: Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. A marriage must be consummated to be valid. You can't consummate a marriage between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. They don't have the necessary equipment and it is therefore scientifically impossible.
Nevermind gay marrage. Thats a joke The promotion of homosexuslity by the liberal culture warriors in educaltion and hollywood leads vulnerable childen into unnaturalal and unfamily lifestyles
As for Fox News as a liberal you may reject everthing Fox says But as a conservative I do not automstically accept everything they say
While the foundational documents of 2000 years or more may have similarities in the intervening hundreds of centuries, Christians following the example of Christ vs the modern day Sharia Supremacists following the example of Mohammed, express themselves much differently today on these issues. That is simply undeniable.
Oh I think you'll find that defense to be quite problematic when it comes to other laws and regulations. /cough global warming /cough EPA /cough polling places... But ok states don't want to spend their money enforcing federal law? Fine. Stop giving federal aid to those states then. Next time California calls FEMA ...give um' get a dial tone. Its only fair, right? Plus as you know it goes well beyond that weak excuse when these sanctuary cities actively impede federal law enforcement by doing such things as refusing to report statistics to crime and terrorism databases, hide or otherwise shield illegals from lawful deportation orders, refuse to hold criminals that have federal warrants for deportation when they've already been picked up for other crimes, and so on.
The only reason homosexuals have the sort of rights you have in mind is because of 5 unelected demigods on the supreme court who over ruled the will of the people