Stop moving the goalposts - w/ the hell does 'fossilized bones' have to do with 'bizarre shaped 'interloping' asteroids from the furthest interstellar reaches of the universe have to do w/ them? W/ do you keep arguing w/ me w/ you know I'm right?
Okay...allow me to extrapolate. You do not believe in Evolution because you doubt the evidence everyone else considers accurate because you cannot see it for yourself. You do not believe radar and mathematical evidence of an interstellar asteroid shaped like a cigar because you cannot see it for yourself. In both cases you distrust the evidence coming from people who CAN see it for themselves because they have the expertise and equipment you do not. As it is highly unlikely you will ever get the equipment and you have no intention of gaining the knowledge or expertise you will be unable to break this cycle of ignorance.
Are you denying the existence of asteroids now? Because you can't see them they don't exist as far as you are concerned.
Yes, I can see he's very sensitive about some issues. Oddly, he has no problem treading all over the beliefs of others when it suits him.
Cerberus would have been at home in the Eighteenth Century, when reports of kangaroos and the duck billed platypus arrived in London.
There is no such thing as a "Black" Swan...never has been and never will be. Have YOU ever seen one? Can you prove its not Photo shopped CGI? Of course not...you just made it up to bash God and continue the Lie....you are a fool and delusional.
It makes me wonder if there were more interstellar asteroids in the past that just got sucked up by Jupiter.
There were MANY more in the past as proven by the cratered moon and late bombardment. Who knows what the Oort cloud has on store for us though.
I'm sure the Universe does not differentiate but likely many of the craters were created by things outside our solar system initially. Rouge planets and debris are quite common according to observations and though the universe is incredibly vast there is obviously possibility of interaction.
As the sun was triggered by nuclear fusion enough debris would be scattered and still remain linked to the gravitational pull of the star. This debris should be more than enough to account for, in an evolving solar system, future asteroids and their interactions.
No of course I'm not - asteroids are like other space debris such as comets and stuff which can be seen on any clear night hurtling through space (think 'shooting stars'?), so how on earth can I deny their existence? So you see - all I need is a little bit of proof?? Now stop digging.
Ever heard the story of The Emperor's New Clothes? Here, read all about it . . . http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/type1620.html You would have been one of the 'admirers' until someone like me ( ) says 'But he isn't wearing any clothes - he's stark naked!', and only then would you (and D_T ) get the message?? In short, I have 'oddball beliefs' and you have gullibility, in that you believe everything you're told w/out ( ) question - just like children do?
The internet is rife with photoshopped images of black swans. https://www.google.co.za/search?rlz...c.1.64.psy-ab..4.1.445...0i30k1.0.yy03ndhMnU0 The conspiracy is EVERYWHERE!
So if you agree that asteroids exist why don't you deny that this particular asteroid exists? Why are you bigoted against elongated interstellar asteroids?