Irrelevant. They have no possibility of doing so. Besides, they still live here. They're not in charge, but they still have the same rights as every other American. They even have limited self rule on their reservations. Besides, before we came on the scene, they were busy killing each other. We did them a favor, IMHO.
Racists are idiots who believe the antiquated term 'race' has meaning. The State of 'Israel' needs replacing with a non-racist , non-colonialist. non-religious state of Call-it-what-you-please.bee As you know, 'genetic studies' prove whatever you decide to prove - here that Nazis are Nazis are Nazis, whatever their alleged 'race'.
God send, indeed - except they'd have to go 'home' to places that were very very glad to see the back of 'em
That's the main reason we know Zionists are Nazis: they agreed with Hitler in detesting traditional Jewry and wanting a murderous Volk instead.
Everybody here shoud know ( the pro Islamo Jihado Paleshtino knows in for sure if they listened in school ), that the Koran prohibits Muslims from deporting people who live on a certain land area, especially civilians, women and children. The Muslim Arabs are so hateful that they forget this part and believe only in blood and war with the sword
Your comment just doesnt go hand in hand with history. According to history, and documents of the British Mandatory offices in Haifa, the Arabs in the Land of Israel came to the Land of Israel by infiltrating to this territory, while the British turned a blind eye on the issue, while making the Jewish immigration to the Land of Israel, a right that was layed out in the document of the Mandate, and the British's obligation to it is also layed out in Severs Treaty, Article 95, as if it was against the law. There were also British Officials that tried to deal with this problem, after a while. In 1947 the Muslim population in the Land of Israel formed hundred of different nations, and hundred of different languages. where they all went just a year later, in 1948, when then Arabs continue to come to this territory but now was for the porpuse to fight against the existance of the state of Israel, on order of the Arab states. One of such Arabs were the Tibi tribe, that Ahmed Tibi, a mamber of the Knesset in Israel is a descendant of it. The family of Ahmed Tibi came here to join Kaukji Gangs. So, as you can read here and you can find alot more in the book "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters, "Palestinians" as a nation does not exist, since they are all group of Arabs from different locations in the Middle East, and therefore cannot be "native nation in Palestine".
Ahmad Tfu Tibi is a cancer within the Israeli parliament. If he tells the same venom in Arab parliaments against "his" country, they will hang him !
There it was, empty, and suddenly Allah decided to send in a population that had always been here, hey? Those who support the Colony develop some very weird notions, don't they?
In 1947, there was no 'Land of Israel', and never had been. Whether you call the indigenous population of the land at the time 'Palestinians', Arabs, Democrats or monkeys doesn't matter. The fact is that the land was occupied by people that the Zionist terrorists decided could be removed to make way for (mostly) Europeans with an appropriate superstition.
What I wrote is written history regarding the place called "Land of Israel". Allah didnt decide to do nothing. the Arabs themselves inflitrated into the land before 1948, and after it was encouraged by the Arab states.
There was never been? the coins in the time before 1948 shows different. In the coins it states "Palestine (Eretz Ysrael)". Therefore, "Palestine" is Eretz Ysrael, which means that the Land of Israel was and still is existed. The land was not occupied by no one. The land of mandated by the Brits to fulfill San Remo Resolution, Which means, to establish for the Jews their national home.
The first bit is true: 'the land was not occupied by no one'. Meaning it was occupied by someone. I'm sure that's not what you intended to say, so I suggest you brush up on your English. Secondly, by reference to the San Remo Resolution, I assume you are really talking about the Balfour Declaration which, if you read it thoroughly, does not state that GB would grant the Jews a 'homeland' - it merely states that the British Government (of the day) ... 'view with favour the establishment in Palestine' .... etc, etc. That's not the same as giving the Jews permission to set up their own state. The stupid thing is, when Balfour made his so-called 'declaration', the war was still raging, GB hadn't yet won, and the Mandate didn't exist. The whole thing was a farce. Oh, and by the way, on the subject of the Balfour nonsense, how come you and your compatriots always manage to ignore the sentence '... it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine...'. Just wondering...
The San Remo Resolution is not the Balfour Decleration. The decleretion was formed in 1917, while the San Remo Resolution was formed in San Remo, Italy, 1920. Therefore, you second part of your comment is not relevent to what I wrote. I never ignored this sentence, if you want to talk about the Balfour Decleration. Israel does not prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in the Land of Israel. I commented on this sentence over and over again.
I suggest you read here: www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-san-remo-conference The San Remo Conference was an international meeting held following the conclusion of World War I that determined the precise boundaries for territories captured by the Allies. The conference, attended by Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan- with the United States as a neutral observer, was held in San Remo, Italy, in April 1920. The conference was a continuation of a previous meeting between these Allied powers that had been held in London in February 1920, where it was decided, among other things, to put Palestine under British Mandatory rule. At San Remo, the Allies confirmed the pledge contained in the Balfour Declaration concerning the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine... I never said or implied that the San Remo Resolution was the Balfour Declaration. However, the Resolution resulted from the San Remo Conference, which dealt with the whole question of the area of the Ottoman Empire that included Palestine. Palestine was the main, if not the only, territory of interest to the Jews, and the Balfour Declaration was obviously of particular relevance. That is why I said in my earlier post that I assumed you were talking about the Balfour Declaration. Sorry if you got confused. Everything in my post still obtains. I'm astounded! So being terrorised, and driven from your home, even murdered, doesn't prejudice your civil rights? WOW! and there was I thinking all those things were illegal!
