Washington State bans gay conversion therapy on minors

You made a challenge. Your challenge was accepted. Your claim was refuted. You refuse to read the link. That is your problem, not mine.

 

Says who?

 

That would have nothing to do with human behavior, the topic of this thread

 

You don't refute anything in debate until you can present your retort

 

You made a challenge. Your challenge was accepted. Your claim was refuted. You refuse to read the link. That is your problem, not mine

 

Well if all behaviors are conscious decisions how do you condition it? Someone could just decide not to have that behavior. That was really undermine the entire field of psychology and psychiatry. Because they could have sent release just say stop it and that would be the end.

 

Now you're moving the goalposts. I said that Behaviour can refer to reactions of objects that are inanimate.

And you said according to who and then I said English speakers.

Now I have provided you with an example of the word being used to describe something that isn't a conscious Act. So you shift to say human behavior after six or seven posts referring to Pavlov and his dogs.

That is dishonest.

 

It's not refuted until you can refute it in your own words. Sorry that you're confused about debating

 

Nobody is discussing magnetic interactions between two objects, except for you, which is of course irrelevant to the behaviors of homosexual human beings

 

Who says consciousness is not involved ?
Pavlov demonstrated that the behavior happens. He never determined the neural pathways dictating it. And every animal was conscious

 

I wasn't discussing that either. I presented a case in which the word behavior was used to discribe something from an inanimate object. You insisted no English speaker did. I proved you wrong.

You can play dumb but that was the point I was making.

 

With unconscious behavior?

He determined that unconscious behaviors can be conditioned.

okay?

Who suggested otherwise?

 

That has nothing to do with the topic.
Now that I understand the point you were trying to make, it's even more ridiculous than I originally imagined

 

He never established that they were unconscious

 

play dumb all you want.

It is ridiculous because you were proven wrong.

Just take the L.

 

Well that was the point of the whole experiment to condition an unconscious Behavior.

 

Homonyms can be tricky.
Bless your heart

 

Hominy Grits are trickiest !
Dodgy even....

 

Subconscious.

 

Where did he ever determine that the process was not consciously mediated?
What is the neural pathway for this process?
Can you diagram it? Surely you know from all of your reading of Pavlov's work, just like you knew this was "operant" conditioning,.....not.

 

Can I post a link to link sausage not patties ?

 

You made a challenge. Your challenge was accepted. Your claim was refuted. You refuse to read the link. That is your problem, not mine

 

How did he establish that this is an unconscions behavior? Please be specific.
Diagram the neural pathway for this behavior, as difinitively demonstrated by Pavlov

 

I like scrapple

 

You claim some link refutes me, yet cannot describe the contents of your own link.
Cute, like an armchair scientist