FBI fires Peter Strzok over anti-Trump texts

Anywhere you work if you conspire against the CEO or the new CEO you've heard may be taking the reigns, you're gone.

Low lifes like that are a dime a dozen.

 

WTF are you talking about. Your trying to put me in a box to fit your agenda. You don't know me, and I have a very public history of being a centrist. But you do whatever you have to, to make yourself happy and to justify your positions.

Im not sure what "separate standards of justice" you think I support. Just because you don't like the outcomes of that justice, doesn't mean it isn't justice. I'm not defending Hillary, I'm pointing out that the right has investigated the Clintons at every turn, yet they haven't found anything. Pointing out facts does not equal support for anything. Both Bill and Hillary were investigated for everything they did for the entirety of Bill Clintons presidency. Hillary has been investigated for anything she did since she became SOS. Nothing has been found. You can claim they are corrupt all you want, but the facts are that nothing illegal was found. And before you you jump on the "everyone is corrupt in letting her off the hook", remember that almost every investigation of the Clintons was handled by republican majorities, therefor they ran the investigations. And FTR, I supported every investigation of both of them. I only stopped supporting them after the first 3 found nothing, and then they started #4, then #5, then #6, then #7, then #8 which I didn't support because I knew why they were doing them (which was genius, and worked as intended). I also support the Mueller investigation into the Russian medling. There was enough smoke to initiate this investigation, and I think it needs to go to conclusion. And I will support whatever they conclude just like i did with the Clinton investigations.

 

I’m not mitigating anything. I’m pointing out that it’s the right who has been screaming on hi about how corrupt Comey was because he was investigating the trump campaign, and using the “insubordination” charge as proof.

And the trump campaign was under investigation at the time, not trump himself. Sorry if that wasn’t clear

trump isn’t under investigation now ? Mueller’s appointment isn’t about trump

 

Then they would have cited it and pressed charges. That’s just a fact. That’s been the goal of the right since the 90’s to charge the Clintons with something, and they haven’t been able to do that. Do you honestly think that if they had that now they would back off ?

 

Cited what?

 

The dnc leaks hadn’t occured when the trump tower meeting happened.

 

So you still can't show me where AG Horo recommended McCabe be terminated simply investigated? Got it........

 

The DNC knew the server was breached, and likely what was downloaded. The FBI informed the DNC long before Wiki published. So pre-emptive damage control then ... makes even more sense under those circumstances.

 

And they also knew it was Russia and that they wanted to help trump. And for some reason wanted trump to know as well?
Lol and how’d the fbi know? Did they see the server lol

 

Expect a cogent response......in a few years .

 

Hahaha! Still he persists! Horowitz recommended McCabe for CRIMINAL PROSECUTION ... and not to "Andy's" buddy Rosenstein, but US Attorney Huber ... Horowitz gave FBI director Wray a copy of his report well in advance of everyone else ... why? Horowitz think "Andy" deserved a promotion, or commendation?

 

Quote the actual recommendation that he be fired? I'll wait.......I am still waiting for the Grassley C.R. of Steele to come to fruition too .

 

No ... they placed Russians in Trump's orbit expecting Comey to go public. Veselnitskaya was Simpsons plant, and in the US on Obama's special visa. Stefan Halper had already gotten Yates & Comey to initiate a counter intel operation targeting Flynn with bogus Russian collusion allegations. Same script, with the only difference being that Svetlana Lokhova wasn't a plant. Putin was predisposed to target Clinton's campaign because Clinton funded the Ukrainian insurgency. We've discussed it before. Putin's preference doesn't change the 2 key facts. Natalia was working with Simpson, and Natalia was given special visa by Obama to return to the US to work with Simpson.

 

You'll wait a long time. I won't entertain this level of foolishness. Comey, McCabe, Baker, Strzok all slammed by the OIG for various criminal, and professional misconduct, aren't misunderstood patriots. Crooks and liars is what they are, and anyone claiming otherwise is a liar too.

 

"Patriots"?
The first thing the left does is try to hijack the language so they can claim leftist rats in the nest are "patriots" and solid citizens.

 

*LOL*

Of course I can, and I did.

Read it again in the context of my posts. You were so eager to do some Hillary-hatin' that you failed to read my posts and the link with any care.

I never stated that the Espionage Act required "intent to harm the US"; rather, I stated that it requires intent. And it does. Look at the element of transmitting or sharing classified information, my benighted friend.

I am teaching you through the Socratic Method. Helping you to learn how to learn. You are welcome.

 

Err, what's "the legal code"?

 

Err, you were wrong, and yap a lot

 

Again....how did Simpson know russia was going to meddle to help trump, and why would they want to help facilitate that?

 

Simpson was Hillary's stooge. Trump had publically called for the release of deleted emails ... if "Russia" had them. Simpson, like his employers, Hillary & the DNC knew in advance of Wiki that the server was breached, per the FBI. Why not scapegoat Russia, and implicate Trump at the same time? Simpson perhaps had the most interest, as the setup might give him leverage if Trump won. Simpson and Natalia were both trying, and being paid to fight Magnitsky.

 

So you can't then......you keep spewing a commentary as if it's factual and then can't back it up.....that's propaganda. Just an FYI....you can't back up your conspiracies.

 

Propaganda eh? What's the current employment status of each and every of the aforementioned? Please ... cherry pick some of Horowitz praise of the aforementioned from "somewhere" in the 400+ page OIG report and post it .... I'll wait!

 

That's Trump discrediting Comey's contemporaneous witnesses to obstruction of justice.........that's the part re corrupt abuse of power, another article of impeachment. You need to start with why Trump needs to discredit these national security patriots. It's because he knows what they have found and are still going to find.

 

Is the all you got left, the name of the legal code?
Swinging for the fences with that no doubt

 

Yeah, 'cause Trump disguised as Obama made Horowitz OIG director. Trump appointed US Attorney Huber while wearing a disguise too.