Kavanaugh, Ford set to testify in Senate Judiciary Committee hearing

You're not using common sense.

You're spewing nonsense.

I can list countless names of successful people that were assaulted and abused. Your standard is that if they were "really" abused they wouldn't be successful.

So seriously, you're not using common sense.

 

You and others are shaming the accused. You and others are baselessly smearing the accused. You and others are attacking the accused without evidence. You and others are trying to ruin a mans life and is family for political purposes.

Why wasn't he treated with the same respect and decorum as was she?

 

But as everyday American's are witnessing, if you have a different opinion than the left requires you to have, you will be subject to attack, and destruction.

Your rights don't exist if you fail their test, and that is being confirmed by the comments you are receiving.

 

What has she brought forward to make her claim beliveable? What evidence and what witness? 4 people SHE listed as witnesses say it didn't happen. Who says it did? Her alleged story is full of holes and she filled none of them in yesterday and in fact some got deeper. So what is the basis, what is the premise of this she is not only believable but more believeable than Kavanaugh, his contemporaneous evidence, and the witnesses you assert?

 

The Democrats for 100% partisan reasons will vote against him today. The Democrats ships of the line were information from the minute he was announced. This baseless allegation was withheld until they were down to their last ship and their last volley. They had nothing left but an outrageous attempt to attack and smear an honorable man.

And you stand for it.

 

I will gladly deal with another troll by ignoring.

 

More fallacious nonsense if it went to court the MD police would investigate and they still can, charges can be filed. The witnesses have all given their statements another investigation is not going to change them. The FBI doesn't go out and cross examine people. They aren't going waterboard the witnesses.

FBI: Mr. Judge did you ever witness Judge Kavanaugh sexually assault anyone?
Mr. Judge: No
FBI: Did yo ever attend a party with Prof. Ford.
Mr. Judge: No

What else is there?

 

Yes she did as did the other four witnesses. The party she claims never happened. And they all made those statements under threat of felony charges. Mr. Judge officially restated it against under threat of felony this morning. What is the FBI going to find different if they ask him?

These are all key facts. Huge holes in her story fill them in

How she got to the party?
Where it was.
How she got home that night?
How if she didn't know where she was how did she know which direction to go to get home?
Why her best friend refutes what she says and has no knowledge of what happened.
Where it happened?
When it happened?

 

They believe the women. He is guilty until he proves otherwise to them.

 

You clearly have not read a single thing I've posted about Kavanaugh, have you?

 

again, go back and read what I said about Kavanaugh. I said I believed him also.

You're barking up the wrong ****ing tree, Blues.

 

Opening statements before the committee vote...

At Dianne Feinstein's whining:

 

I will speak as rhetorically as you.

Why wasn't he treated with the same respect and decorum as was she?

What has she brought forward to make her claim beliveable? What evidence and what witness? 4 people SHE listed as witnesses say it didn't happen. Who says it did? Her alleged story is full of holes and she filled none of them in yesterday and in fact some got deeper. So what is the basis, what is the premise of this she is not only believable but more believeable than Kavanaugh, his contemporaneous evidence, and the witnesses?

 

Before you off making a fool out yourself accusing others of not understanding the English language you need to read what was said by Judge K

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-hearing-leland-keyser-statement.html

All four witnesses who were alleged to be at the event said it didn’t happen. Including Dr. Ford’s long-time friend, Ms. Keyser, who said that she didn’t know me and that she does not recall ever being at a party with me, with or without Dr. Ford."

If Ms. Keyser does not recall being at the party then she cannot say that " the event ( said it )didn’t happen". If she was not at the party then the honest and logical answer to the question "did Kavanaugh attempt to disrobe or grope Miss 'Ford' " is "I do not know, I because I do not recall being at the party. The honest answer of I do not know if proper. Kavanaugh was throwing the bull when he said that All four witnesses who were alleged to be at the event said it didn’t happen".

That was not an honest statement by Judge K.

 

What evidence did she present yesterday to support her claim and refute the absolute definitive statements there was no such party BY HER OWN ALLEGED WITNESSES?

 

Which witness said it happened?

 

No it didn't.

 

She needs a quiet, long, forensic interview, where she can explore this trauma and recover her memories. For these vile evil Democrats to throw her under the Nation's spotlight that for their own crass political assassination attempt is one of the most despicable acts ever perpetrated in American Politics.

I'm ashamed that these people are Americans.

 

Her testimony was earnest and she stuck to her story. I believe she was assaulted - I just don't think it was Kavanaugh, and if it was Kavanaugh, I'd need more input to believe it was him.

So what if her 4 witnesses said they didn't recall? IT was clear she was abused by someone at some time. She reacted and spoke like someone who was honestly assaulted.

As for the judge, I also said I found his testimony to be believable and his heart felt emotion to be a strength, despite liberals here acting like he's a cry baby. I also said I thought his humane side came out, which is absolutely important.

My problem with Kavanaugh stems from his absolutely clear admission of who he is loyal to, and it ain't America or the Constitution.

 

I do hope that Dr. Ford is questioning her own attorney now regarding the offer for council to go to her privately in California rather than make her go before the hearing in DC. During the hearing yesterday, her lawyer was quick to attempt to shut down any questions to Dr. Ford about that and then she seemed confused about that offer. Hmmmm, perhaps her attorney kept the info from her.

 

He's loyal to the Constitution.

 

They should be brought up before the bar and sanctioned. Else Ford was lying .

 

Fair enough the Democrats should stop with the allegations and vote and then move on don't you think.

So what? It means her accusations are not true. If she was abused by someone else then that is an entirely different matter and has nothing to do with Kavanaugh. Had the Democrats handled this properly that would have been discovered early on and her allegations dismissed and she would have been saved this gross ordeal. But that was not in the political interest of the Democrats.

Who presented the better evidenced case?

He made no such admission and he is CLEARLY a Constitutionalists judge, one of or most stellar.

 

I don't think so. His tirade proved he wasn't.

 

His tirade proved it. Ranting and raving about the left, leftists, conspiracies about money, conspiracies about everything.

He's not a constitutionalist or he would never have sided with the patriot act.