I want to create a large private city in middle america that can outright ban guns.

That would create a huge black market for pistols. Every armed thug in America would love your place.

BTW: A boarder is someone living in your house. You are thinking of borders.

 

What the Brits and Aussies did didn't do much, and would be unconstitutional here in the US. You want British style confiscations? Overturn the 2nd Amendment.

 

There were 140,000 violent crimes in FL in 1998, the year before the law went into effect (1999). In 2016, there were 88,000 violent crimes, despite an increase in FL population from 15.5 million in 1998 to 20.66 million.

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/flcrime.htm

 

Uh....ok. They have very high gun deaths though. One law is not NEAR enough

 

Slaughter is the price of freedom.

You can't make this stuff up folks

 

America, where you are expected to be willing to die for the right to have a gun, yet thinks healthcare is a privilege and that you should die if you can't afford it. Yeah makes sense

 

You sound like you be happier somewhere else.

 

Well slaughter is the price of freedom. LOL

 

Such would never pass constitutional muster. Therefore there is no point in discussing such a proposal.

 

How does having a gun make you more free? The US is not even top 20 freest in the world

 

Does not have to its private and the owner of private property is as the castle doctrine puts it, a king.

 

There is no constitutional right to have someone else pay your own bills.

 

Private property owners do not have the legal authority to dictate what the punishment for certain crimes on their property is. Especially when the punishment for a minor offense is life without the possibility of parole. One may as well propose public executions.

 

Its called everyone paying 2-3% in taxes and everyone getting free healthcare. no one is paying for someone else its called insurance thats how it works. Do you drive on roads?

 

Cite the criteria being referred to for defining a country as being "free" in this discussion.

 

If it would be legal (and it is) to kill someone for being on the private property with out permission then it is dam sure legal to jail them.

 

Meaning that someone else is paying the bills of others. Meaning that it is not actually free.

What relevance does the above question have to do with anything?

 

Pray tell, where in the united states is it legal for a private individual to kill someone for committing an act of trespassing?

 

Having gun rights is part of the US freedom. You don't have to own a gun.

Government imposing unconstitutional restrictions and not enforcing the laws against felons is the problem.

 

You sound like you'd be happier somewhere else.

 

No its not

 

https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2018-table-country-scores

LOL the US plumited fast from last year we are like 50 something now

 

So, the conservative and punitive route. What makes your private city different from any other dictatorship?

 

"Benevolence".

 

You can't be 100% safe. Just ask California.