Half of Americans say Trump is victim of a 'witch hunt' as trust in Mueller erodes

they sure are tough to spot, ain't they?

 

People running for President don't give up their 4th Amendment rights. Butif that is what the Democrats want then pass a law that requires a special prosecutor be assigned to every person who announces they are running and that means I ten at last count for Democrat candidates.

 

I will accept Meuller's findings, regardless of my personal opinion, as soon as we find out what his final report reveals. For some strange reason I happen to trust the rule of law - go figger.

Until then, I'll wait. OTOH, regardless of its content, it will not change the fact that your dear leader is a liar, a cheat and a crook, that needs a scanning electron microscope to first find and then examine his character.

 

Top New Democratic Party Leadership, former heads of our Nations Security agencies, and a parade of other prominent figures accused the President of treason and being a puppet of Putin.

All lies, misrepresentations, and complete propaganda.

And you bring up comments the President made as a candidate in 2016?

Here is what was reported about that.

https://nypost.com/2016/05/03/donald-trump-links-ted-cruzs-dad-to-jfk-assasination/

Trump stopped well short of accusing Cruz’s dad of plotting to kill JFK. But he still sought to place the elder Cruz alongside President Kennedy’s accused killer.
​

At least your claim was staying true to the New Democratic Party values....

 

so how does that excuse Trump from anything.... Trump is the President...... lol

I swear if Trump murdered someone on 5th ave, the right woudl be like, yeah but OJ was found not guilty for killing his wife

 

I get the idea you post stuff and you're not really sure it even makes sense to you.

I see you added more absurd claims to your post.

As the NY Post article confirmed, you made up the accusation about the President accusing others of being part of the assassination, and now you've pulled another comment out of the clouds.

Like the leadership of the party you bow to, the distortions and propaganda just never stops. And to think NDP'rs think they can talk about honesty.

 

Is this your best shot????????

 

So you don't think Ted Cruz' Father was the Grassy Knoll Shooter? That's fine, I can respect that.



The vast attempt to undo the 2016 election has failed.

 

You base that assumption on what exactly? Our Country needs to move on, and get back to work on the very important issues facing our Country. That is a something that both Democrats and Republicans should want.

 

That investigation is now completed.

 

Maybe in downtown Pensacola he could get away with it, primarily because they don't have a 5th Avenue, but in NYC on 5th Avenue they would arrest him with screw-down handcuffs, turn the screws down to the bone, and never take the cuffs off.

 

I'm not interested in shooting.

I have correctly noted that a Special Counsel was appointed by the Trump Department of Justice to "to oversee the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters." Obviously, such an attack by a hostile foreign power upon the US electoral process is a matter of vital national security that demands no less.

Criminal indictments were issued, convictions secured, and confessions elicited from Trump operatives during the course of the inquiry.

That investigation has been completed, and the report submitted. The public is yet to be apprised of its findings.

Other ongoing investigations and litigation are focusing on issues including Trump's businesses and financial dealings, personal conduct, charitable foundation and inaugural committee.

Pretending that those investigations by the law enforcement agencies conducting them are also illegal won't work either.

 

You realize that the investigation was NOT for the purpose of informing the public right?

Also, conducting investigations seeking evidence of crimes without grounds for laws broken is not admissible in a court of law. Basically the Democrats are breaking laws hoping to find laws broken by the president.

 

If you need to pretend that the Trump Justice Department's appointment of a Special Counsel "to oversee the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters" was illegal, and that your Trump was impotent to enforce whatever law you fancy prohibited it, that is what you will do, no doubt.

 

You realize that there is a public demand, expressed by elected representatives of both parties, that the truth be revealed, and whether that demand is honored by the Attorney General is his decision, right?

The indictments issued, convictions secured, and confessions elicited are all in compliance with the law unless and until they are established in a court of law to have been otherwise, of course.

 

Pick up a law book, you really need to understand how search warrants are suppose to be granted and used. Further, you lack any working knowledge of the Comey FBI era politically motivated investigations.

 

Doesn't matter what the "public" wants. Special councils are not subject to public view. I expect one or more Democrats will "leak" what they are told. That should be met with legal action against them.

 

Because they are destructive pests when they get inside your home. And boy can they find a way. I’ve had squirrel issues. I don’t wish them on anybody.

 

Kill the messenger, eh?

 

Poor lil squirrels.

 

Information concerning national security and innocent people who were peripheral to the special counsel's investigation CANNOT be made public by law and regulation.

The attorney general is not required to make the SC's report public at all, by law. The attorney general does not have to release the report to congress, by law. By law the attorney general is given total control of this.

Also by law the attorney general can release as little info OR as much info as they wish, that is, within the limitations of the scope of the law that protects the national security and innocent people.

The attorney general said that as much as possible will be released within the scope of the law and regulations governing such optional release.

The attorney general has opted to make a public release under the law.

End of story.

 

I understand that you fancy yourself a legal scholar whose acumen in that discipline comports with your ideological predisposition.

 

Bear in mind that Natty is British and is probably basing most of what he posts on laws and a justice system that does not exist in the United States. Mostly we just laugh at him.

 

Poor thousands of dollars wasted because they like to chew wires and defecate in your insulation making your entire house a biohazard. And it only takes one.

 

Tell that to the turtle.