Question about climate change

Have A Nice Day

 

Another alarmist scurries away from reality. Too funny.

 

Actually, though I would normally allow you to get the last word and feel all smug and stuff, this time I feel the need to explain something to you. You were dismissed because I have dealt with people like you quite often and accept the futility of attempting discussion, I also simply do not care anymore. About your "Opinion" or this issue for the most part, because if you are correct then no one has anything to worry about and if I am then the combination of the results of my research and human nature/Global societies indicate that we cannot do anything anyway. Regardless I will be dead before it gets serious so who cares.

 

All of what I’ve said is factual. You are dismissing facts.

 

Is this dismissal?
"Okay....I agree, can we now discuss what is happening TODAY? "

 

Seriously ?

 

Your reality disagrees with all the relevant research facilities in the world, nasa, our military and Trumps own scientist in govt.

 

Do you really know what represents the rate of change on a graph of the data over time ? Say slope.

 

This is exactly what escapes people who use the argument that warming is cyclical. It is an over-abused argument. Cyclical phenomena involve a gradual curve.

This most recent warming trend is not a curve. It is an abrupt wall.

 

Yes it is dismissal of facts. Warming periods have occurred ten times in this interglacial period. All warming (cooling) occurred with no change in CO2. But alarmists claim that the current warming is entirely due to CO2 increases. That’s dismissal of facts.

 

I don't see the USA being underwater anytime soon.

 

What’s the source of that ??

 

Funny stuff that.

 

Look carefully at the graph you posted.

 

Okay...

whatever.

Have a Day

 

There you go again - Ignoring facts which don’t agree with the CO2 driven global warming alarmist narrative.

 

Fox News ?
What's the source for your supposition ? Hannity ?

 

Name one science institution at any govt or university in the world that agrees with

 

NOAA. That’s where the data from peer reviewed papers come from.

 

So you have no source for the graph ??

 

You can’t produce one statement from noaa that disagrees with AGW. Produce it.
Here’s one of many that back it up from NOAA.
https://www.noaa.gov/education/reso...te-education-resources/climate-change-impacts

 

Who has claimed that human CO2 emissions don’t affect global average temperature ?? But clearly as hundreds of peer reviewed papers including some from NOAA have shown CO2 is not the global warming control knob.

 

You have no source for your incorrect statement. AAAS

Article from AAAS discussing the rate of change recently during the last 150 years.
The graph is from AAAS
https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/2_camille parmesan - AAAS_Carnegie 2015 Parmesan.pdf

 

try reading for a change instead of listening to Trump

There are NO articles sponsored by noaa that say CO2 levels are not the main cause of recent history warming trends.
produce them instead of bloviating

https://www.noaa.gov/topic-tags/carbon-dioxide

 

You have no source for your bogus graph.

Come'on man. In the current interglacial period which is called the Holocene period and is ~ 10,000 years long there have been 10 warming periods. Five of those have shown rates greater than we see now, seven of those show higher temperatures than we see now, and none of those warming and cooling cycles show any correlation with CO2 concentration. This is from peer reviewed scientific papers including NOAA.