Pro abortion advocates to be consistent would state that if no one wanted to raise them it’s acceptable to terminate their lives.
Firstly, no one is "Pro-Abortion" unless they are sadistic deviants....they are Pro Choice. Secondly....what you describe is called murder. Finally, this old anti-choice game you play is disingenuous even when done well....you do it poorly.
Again( and again and again) you have never proven there are "pro-abortion advocates" because there aren't any. There are decent people who are Pro-Choice, they want women to have the same right to their body as everyone else. They do not advocate abortion , they advocate "Choice". No Pro-Choicer has ever said it's OK to murder born children..... But Anti-Choicers have no facts, nothing to say, so have to invent things to say...no matter how silly...
They are clearly pro abortion. The see nothing wrong with terminating a human life via abortion. I'm just following the thought process of another poster. What is disingenuous about pointing out that abortion is termination of a human life in order to reduce the number of abortions and save human lives ??
FoxHastings said: ↑ Again( and again and again) you have never proven there are "pro-abortion advocates" because there aren't any. There are decent people who are Pro-Choice, they want women to have the same right to their body as everyone else. They do not advocate abortion , they advocate "Choice". No Pro-Choicer has ever said it's OK to murder born children..... But Anti-Choicers have no facts, nothing to say, so have to invent things to say...no matter how silly... Which you have never proven.....repeating it doesn't make it true....For once show proof of what you say....show a post where someone says, "I want all women to have abortions"...something, anything resembling proof... Look up the word "choice" in the dictionary....it might help ….(probably not) Now I'll be expecting your one line repeat of nothing
One of the choices is abortion. Therefore pro choice is pro abortion. See how that works. Are you against abortion ??
And of course terminating the life of a two year old is murder. It’s illegal. Terminating the life of an unborn human is not murder. It is legal.
FoxHastings said: ↑ FoxHastings said: ↑ Again( and again and again) you have never proven there are "pro-abortion advocates" because there aren't any. There are decent people who are Pro-Choice, they want women to have the same right to their body as everyone else. They do not advocate abortion , they advocate "Choice". No Pro-Choicer has ever said it's OK to murder born children..... But Anti-Choicers have no facts, nothing to say, so have to invent things to say...no matter how silly... Which you have never proven.....repeating it doesn't make it true....For once show proof of what you say....show a post where someone says, "I want all women to have abortions"...something, anything resembling proof... Look up the word "choice" in the dictionary....it might help ….(probably not) Now I'll be expecting your one line repeat of nothing ...and got it ) OK, You couldn't/ wouldn't look up "choice" in the dictionary..... That makes it tough sledding to get you to understand it....probably impossible.. You know, you can ignore the fact that you never show proof of your statements but others can see it
FoxHastings said: ↑ Again( and again and again) you have never proven there are "pro-abortion advocates" because there aren't any. There are decent people who are Pro-Choice, they want women to have the same right to their body as everyone else. They do not advocate abortion , they advocate "Choice". No Pro-Choicer has ever said it's OK to murder born children..... But Anti-Choicers have no facts, nothing to say, so have to invent things to say...no matter how silly... Which you have never proven.....repeating it doesn't make it true....For once show proof of what you say....show a post where someone says, "I want all women to have abortions"...something, anything resembling proof... Look up the word "choice" in the dictionary....it might help ….(probably not) Now I'll be expecting your one line repeat of nothing OK, You couldn't/ wouldn't look up "choice" in the dictionary..... That makes it tough sledding to get you to understand it....probably impossible.. You know, you can ignore the fact that you never show proof of your statements but others can see it How about I answer that right after you show proof of your claims??? FOR A CHANGE...
I am against Abortion, which is why I have children. I am against telling or forcing my ethical choices on a stranger, especially if it means taking control of their lives.....I suppose that is where you and I differ. I am not of the opinion that I get to make other people do what I want.
I’ll answer it for you. You are not against abortion and therefore are for abortion. Those who are for abortion are pro abortion. See how that works.
FoxHastings said: ↑ Again( and again and again) you have never proven there are "pro-abortion advocates" because there aren't any. There are decent people who are Pro-Choice, they want women to have the same right to their body as everyone else. They do not advocate abortion , they advocate "Choice". No Pro-Choicer has ever said it's OK to murder born children..... But Anti-Choicers have no facts, nothing to say, so have to invent things to say...no matter how silly... Which you have never proven.....repeating it doesn't make it true....For once show proof of what you say....show a post where someone says, "I want all women to have abortions"...something, anything resembling proof... Look up the word "choice" in the dictionary....it might help ….(probably not) Now I'll be expecting your one line repeat of nothing OK, You couldn't/ wouldn't look up "choice" in the dictionary..... That makes it tough sledding to get you to understand it....probably impossible.. You know, you can ignore the fact that you never show proof of your statements but others can see it How about I answer that right after you show proof of your claims??? FOR A CHANGE... No, that only "works" in your mind... But , before I forget, thankyou for giving me the opportunity to repeat my post
As am I.....but as I stated and you ignore, I do not think MY ethics should be used to control others. I guess I am simply less egotistical than you are.
I find it hard to believe you could be that daft....considering your answer is plastered all over the posts you are replying to.
