Climate activists climb, superglue themselves to globe at Universal Studios

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Steve N, Apr 22, 2019.

  1. spiritgide

    spiritgide Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2016
    Messages:
    20,277
    Likes Received:
    16,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I hope that is the newest, never-fail weatherproof superglue.... wouldn't want them to fall. Could be a tourist attraction for Universal.
     
    Steve N and Ddyad like this.
  2. mitchscove

    mitchscove Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    7,870
    Likes Received:
    4,479
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know. Facts don't matter to you ideologues. Never have. The end justifies any means. If you don't want to debate issues with real scientists, maybe you should exit the forum and join the clowns who are advertising the strength of carbon-based superglue
     
  3. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,545
    Likes Received:
    25,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A little climate change hysteria goes a long way. This may help.

     
    spiritgide and Steve N like this.
  4. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The idea that you're interested in facts is laughable. The grown up debate has moved on. Its arguably a debate between micro and macro issues: from liberalism (importance of entrepreneurial analysis; application of nudging) to sustainability (rejection of policymaking around growth maximisation)
     
  5. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,131
    Likes Received:
    28,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't you hate it when you forget that you started your response saying that you refute the Malthusian model and then end up saying everyone should adopt it? Suddenly, your wind seems to have stopped....
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
    Steve N, Ddyad and TrackerSam like this.
  6. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Another nonsense reply. I have made no Malthusian argument (although, to be fair, Malthus is still used as part of standard growth theory)
     
  7. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,131
    Likes Received:
    28,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then you clearly haven't red the green new deal. I'd suggest reading it first....
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  8. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I liked your misspell there.
    Freudian slip?
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
    Ddyad likes this.
  9. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,131
    Likes Received:
    28,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL... I was obviously trying to be subtle....
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  10. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    First, I didn't mention green new deal. I referred to green deal within local government. Second, I doubt you really have an understanding of Malthusian analysis (accounting for your quite childish response).
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
  11. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,131
    Likes Received:
    28,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is what you wrote:
    "
    Reiver said:
    I see you didn't respond to anything actually said. Tut tut! Let's go through it. I rejected Malthusian analysis, countering your petty whine. I referred to how the protestors are correct over bringing forward carbon neutrality. I referred to the need to change the regulatory framework. That should include procurement policies which exclude polluting firms. We also need to adapt the Preston model of devolution and integrate green deal radicalism."

    I know, forgetting is sometimes an option...
     
    Jestsayin, Ddyad and TrackerSam like this.
  12. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep, zero reference to green new deal. Yep, zero reference to Malthusian analysis. Indeed, it is a cretinous claim as it's a reference to local government.
     
  13. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,131
    Likes Received:
    28,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You really need to read what green deal radicalism entails... it pretty much adopts the worst of Malthus and applies a liberal dose of Marxism... I know, you didn't know... Obviously.
     
    Ddyad, TrackerSam and garyd like this.
  14. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You need to read up on everything mentioned as you're clearly making ludicrous comment. The Green Deal was actually constructed around orthodox externality analysis. It provided mechanisms for low level subsidies. It didn't go far enough in terms, for example, in promoting green industries. Twinning it with the Preston model is key as it's about minimising leakage from the local community (further promoting the value of investments).

    You've made up an argument based on your own warped view over the green new deal (one word creating a completely different analysis). To suggest more efficient local government is somehow Malthusian really isn't cunning. It only confirms that you're not constructing argument from a suitably developed understanding of the different schools of thought.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
  15. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,341
    Likes Received:
    16,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    HOw about a murder of crows
     
  16. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,341
    Likes Received:
    16,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only thing that threatens the very nature of societies is leftist nincompoopery and horrible policy solutions for nonexistent problems.
     
    Ddyad and TrackerSam like this.
  17. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let em piss and **** themselves
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
    TrackerSam and nra37922 like this.
  18. opion8d

    opion8d Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    5,864
    Likes Received:
    4,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well their little stunt did serve one useful purpose, it brought out the crackpots and science deniers so can see why GED classes are always in demand.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
  19. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,341
    Likes Received:
    16,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Super glue just another friendly hydrocarbon....With a touch of nitrogen for good measure.
     
    Ddyad and drluggit like this.
  20. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Low powered arguments from the right wing are expected. Shame they can't at least pretend well thought out critique through stuff like libertarian paternalism.
     
  21. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,341
    Likes Received:
    16,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one denies science.. except leftists...
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  22. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,341
    Likes Received:
    16,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So far you have produce no better arguments just jargon ladened crap, but that is your forte
     
    Ddyad and TrackerSam like this.
  23. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep, knowledge of the debate is a bad thing to you fellows. Already know that.
     
  24. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,341
    Likes Received:
    16,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know a good deal actually. Do you no anything beyond Marxist/green jargon that is designed more with obfuscation rather than explanation in mind?
     
  25. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm sure you big yourself up. However, the point stands. Right wing fellows can't even manage a coherent critique of the radicals. We've seen that with the climate change denial, rather than sound application of libertarian paternalism. It's as if right wingers are desperate to dumb down...
     

Share This Page