Republicans: Do you now believe the Mueller Report should be accepted by all?

He responded with lies to a credible accusation. I have never been accused. Credible or otherwise.

Every time you try to tell me what I think, you are wrong.

 

Only those congress members with the proper security clearances should be able to see the unredacted copy. As Congress leaks like a sieve, it should be made clear that any who reveal classified material to the media or anybody else should immediately go to jail for the balance of their term in office. Hopefully their states will then recall them. Those with proper clearances should be able to report to Congress that the redactions are proper at this time and none would change the overall conclusions in the Mueller Report.

 

And this makes him a sexual harasser?

Okay, but if you were, would you deserve to be labelled a sexual harasser?

Alright, so again, do you think that the president should always trust the intelligence agencies? And still nothing on why it would've been illegal for Mueller to come out with the truth if Barr was covering something up?

 

Okay, so then how in the hell were you able to say that it was "only" the right that was obsessed with collusion?

 

Yes!!!! Search for a thread titled something like "Falsus in Unum"

Off topic here.

Question 1, besides the point and off-topic. Question 2 irrelevant now that the report came out.

 

Okay, so you don't think he was a credible witness. How does this mean that he is a sexual assaulter?

 

NO COLLUSION, no obstruction... yes, it's final. Time for democrats to move on although i personally would prefer that democrats keep at it, even impeach the president. This would be the best case scenario for Trump...

Assume there is a scenario where this goes to Supreme Court where Supreme court has to rule whether there was obstruction of justice. It will never go there as the AG has already concluded there was no obstruction but i'm just making up a scenario where it is on the hands of legal scholars and highest court in the Country.

What would they be looking at?

1. Was there an underlying crime that Trump was trying to cover up? NO
2. When Trump contemplated firing Mueller, was this something he had authority to do? YES, under the constitution
3. Had he fired Mueller, can this be construed as obstruction of justice? NO, because he can fire staff whenever he wants to and there was no crime to cover up

Supreme court would very quickly conclude - no wrongdoing, no crime.

I know that the more time congress, media spend on this Mueller report, the more clear the above will become in the minds of Americans and the more damaging for the left. I really want this to continue, and i really want the house to impeach Trump. please democrats, keep at it!

 

** Read again.

 

Are you not calling him a non-credible witness based on Falsus in Unum?

 

Okay, so then how in the hell were you able to say that it was "only" the right that was obsessed with collusion?

 

Kavanaugh waved his dick in the face of a female classmate at Harvard. Is that the kind of guy we want sitting on the SCOTUS? Not in MY AMERICA. We have elected a guy who has bragged about grabbing women’s vaginas and said “they just let you when you are a big star”. Come on champ, we can do better than this.

 

Lolz ... says creepy porn lawyer. Where's rape party co-hostess Swetnick hiding? Must have slunk off angrily after being passed over for the award.

 

So you are asserting that waving your penis in women’s faces is ok and makes you a great jurist? Ok.

 

Why did you post this?

Which lawyer?

 

And can you cite a source to back up this claim?

Do you actually believe that they let him do it?

 

I'm asserting ... "never happened". Don't know where Swetnick is? How about Dianne Feinstein? She gotten around to impeaching Kavanaugh? Kamala, Booker? Feinstein's staffers all moonlight as private detectives ... and Avanetti has a dvd right? Kavanaugh bribed all your reps?

 

1) Google: Judge Kavanaugh waves dick at Harvard classmate. Hundreds of hits.

2) No, I think he just assumes that because he has a lot of money and he is on TV a lot that they don’t mind.

 

Do you even know who made the accusation?

 

Mark my words. Kavanaugh’s filthy actions will be exposed any day now.

 

Half the student body and the beer delivery guy.

 

I posted it to mock Jack for derailing this thread by throwing a debunked strawman into the discussion.

 

I'll look for your thread on that BOMBSHELL!

 

Which lawyer?

 

Avanetti "represented" Swetnick.

 

Actually, to be fair to @jack4freedom, he was merely responding to my mention of Kavanaugh in reply to another user - this user is the one to blame for first mentioning him in this thread, calling him a "sexual harasser" in passing, however, I haven't helped by continuing to challenge that user on how they can make such an accusation about an INNOCENT man! The left truly do not believe in that VERY BASIC legal principle of INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!