Republicans: Do you now believe the Mueller Report should be accepted by all?

No obstruction, no collusion the only cultist are those still parroting the narrative Russian collusion and obstruction. No facts, no evidence, just a cultist faith.

 

How do you expect anybody to answer that when only like 20 people on the planet have read it?

 

Oh... Ok. I misunderstood. I apologize. So you accept the report wherever it leads.

Glad to hear that. Me too!

 

The question is if you trust Mueller as an honest prosecutor. I do....

 

Sure

If there was evidence that trump colluded with russia to steal the election from hillary I would have to accept it

But instead there is no evidence yet you still hold on like a dog with a bone

 

Is anyone even saying that anything that might come out in the Mueller report that finds Trump guilty will NOT be accurate and true?

 

I wasn't asking why he didn't go public DURING the investigation, I'm asking why he hasn't gone public now that the investigation is over IF Barr was covering something up. Again, you seem to think that there would be some sort of problem with Mueller coming out with the truth if Barr has covered something up and you haven't explained why. Remember, you BIZARRELY said that Mueller would be "a nut like Trump and his lackeys" if he came out with the truth about his report if Barr was covering something up. You haven't explained why coming out with the truth would make him "a nut like Trump and his lackeys!" It really is just crazy talk and I thought that you had more stability than that. You of all people would be CHEERING ON Mueller if he came out with the truth! Wouldn't you? I certainly would be!

Okay. Well the report has already gone to the AG, so why does that stop Muller from coming out with the truth if something has been covered up by Barr?

Sure, but by your standards, can't YOU be called a sexual harasser? And if you were, would you just accept it?

Oh sorry, did you witness Kavanaugh sexually harassing someone?

No matter how many 'Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq' type scandals there are?

 

What were you calling a mis-characterization?

You said that "Mueller has not come out with any statement regarding his investigation" which would include
the statement correcting the Buzzfeed fake news. So are you saying that he was or was not involved in this statement?

"Electoral system" implies the computer systems which handle various parts of the election, which people were originally thinking may have been hacked by Russia. So you weren't meaning this?

 

What poll is that?

 

In Golem's world just knowing someone makes them guilty? You must not be familiar with the legal concept of "fruit from the poison tree"? Mueller was charged with the investigation of "collusion" between Trump and the Russians to throw the election. If the investigation proves to be unfounded, then anything else they found would be fruit from the poison tree. Meaning all of the other alleged wrong doing would have not been found if not for the false collusion investigation. Even a first year law student could fight it on a 4th amendment argument.

Please don't be surprised when all the indictments and plea deals are vacated.

 

That was the scope of Mueller's investigation. If there is no collusion, then the "other" crimes are irrelevant as fruit from the poison tree.

 

I do, but only evidence regarding collusion matters.

 

In what way has he abused his power exactly?

 

ONLY the right?

 

So funny! I keep saying again and again that collusion is irrelevant. That it's the other criminal issues that matter. And you keep accusing me of "holding on" to collusion.

Interesting for an analysis of how cult psychology makes people "selectively deaf", but not very useful in a political debate.

 

Weirdly worded question. What do you think? Do you think it won't?

 

Collusion is the lie that liberal Deep Staters used to launch the witchhunt against trump

So it matters very much that trump was not guilty of the allegation

 

Who says the investigation is over?

False premise.

Already responded. **

No

No relation.

 

Different topic.

No idea.... Not even sure what it was supposed to be "correcting".

Sure. If that includes the computer systems that the political parties use to communicate internally. Or the ones they use to communicate with voters.

 

Quoting directly from the appointment letter:

"...and any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation;..."

You don't believe me? Ask Manafort.

As a matter of fact, ask any of the 37 indicted whom, just a couple of messages back, you yourself said were not indicted for "collusion between Trump and the Russians to throw the election". You can't have it both ways, you know....

Sorry dude, your idol is in..... what's the legal term?... oh, yeah... "big doodoo". (bigus doodensis) And the fact that you can't even get your own arguments straight shows that... you know it!!

 

The Mueller report won’t be enough to impeach. So the Dems will ignore it and press on with their own investigations and attacks.

This won’t end until Trump is out of office.

 

I know of 37 indicted who would beg to differ.

 

**

 

Only.

 

No. Us evil "Liberal Deep Staters" demanded an investigation of this