I think one of the reason the anti-Fa-fascists hate Andy Ngo is that he has catalogued all the fake 'racist attack' hoaxes that the mainstream media and liberal custardheads fall for. There is a great demand for 'racist attack' incidents, but the supply of genuine ones is low.... so supply has expanded to fulfill demand. He also documents other incidents where the fascist Left try to prevent people from speaking, if they don't like their ideas. (I'm not talking about Proud Boys here, but about conservative speakers of whom the fascist Left disapprove. Here's an example: https://quillette.com/2018/03/29/which-side-are-you-on/ Of course their lawyers on this forum will no doubt find a reason to approve of this particular action -- hmm... it's on YouTube so it must be fake, look at the sweet faces of those girls and boys, are you afraid of them har har har... and then there's Trump .. racists ... Nazis ... and look at that squirrel over there!
He was told to denounce them and he did BUT he THEN said that "some are fine people" in a way that was very ambiguous. He should have denounced the Nazis FIRST and VERY clearly but he let the matter stand in a way that could easily be misinterpreted. Most people who study such things say he was trying not to offend the Nazis, which he had done some months before with the famous "Who's David Duke?" bushwa At worst he's openly seeking the approval of Nazis, at best he being stupid beyond belief. /QUOTE]
Weren't you the one defending the totalitarian anti free speech storm trooping violent thugs a few post back? I don't think you know what a "Nazi" is. Obama came closest by dictating to the auto industries what they'll make and how much they will charge.. Nazi are more clever than commies in that regard.. if the industry fails, then NAzis can blame the industry; for commies.. if the industry fails, the commie govt. is blamed.
"I have never heard yet of any sort of advocacy group, right or left, that would even THINK of beating up an INOFFENSIVE reporter." Really? How far out of touch are you? A reporter must not report on the true nature of the Antifa-terrorists, lest they be labled "offensive" and then be subject to justifiable beatings? Really? https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...at-richmond-rally-he-was-out-of-line-n2370077 If the "offensive" reporters don't report on the Mexican cartels, they won't be killed? Well duh, you are correct. Is that the country that you want to live in? Really??!? http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2019/06/mexico-nine-journalists-killed-so-far.html?m=1 "IMO this story illustrates how HARMLESS AntiFa is." Harmless? Harmless??!? They beat up a journalist, while he was exposing their terrorist acts. What the heck are you talking about?
I am not surprised you don't condemn violence. I am also not surprised, you are aware of the history of RW types who always beat up and belittled anyone not like them. I guess there's not much to expect from tRUMP voters.
A big one is called the artifacts, these are describe these things being out of place due to editing. Stretched images or distorted images in the videos. let's just say if you can fake something without having any of these artifacts in it you shouldn't be doing it for some low-level YouTuber it should not have a pretty prestigious job in Hollywood. Because they can spend hundreds of millions on movies and the fake s*** they make still looks fake.
I don't falt you for not caring, you have no emotional connection to me. And let's face it I'm dealing with people who didn't give one **** about Heather H. Why should I care about them is the question I ask myself. Yes it's easy, idinit
What post was that? Why don't you tell us all what a Nazi is? Not by examples, an actual definition. Let's be clear on this
You expect me to care about those who don't care about me. You are mistaken me for a natural born victum, thats not me. Now show me where I said they can't say what they want, and that would be a different story, wouldn't it? Now why should I care?
Nothing wrong with my history. I wasn't referring to blacks only, but gays or anyone not white and male. RW has always been and still are today, against anyone not white, not male, not hetero, etc etc etc. As was mentioned a few times already, around the 1960s, folks started switching parties from D to R and today they are R. The South was responsible for black beatings and killings. Regardless of party 100 yrs ago. Today, that group resides in the R party, as did David Duke switch parties and even was an elected official as R.
That's nothing, democrats lauded a grand wizard as the icon of democrats in congress. They praised him effusively when he died.
That gives you the right to be a fascist? Not loved enough? Seems like a pretty flimsy reason. Intolerance should win the day, not another Nazi Party movement.
So multiple cameras faked this, he wasn't actually treated on scene by Portland medics, and he wasnt diagnosed with a brain hemorrhage, and his lawyer isn't actually about to ride medieval on Portland?
That is the hysterical liberal narrative down pat. The south was responsible for black beatings and lynching under democrats. Lyndon Johnson while in the Senate never found an anti-lynching bill he could support. The south started turning republican in the 70-80s with the influx of northern industry and had nothing to do with democrat racist policies and history.
Oh, Jesus. Just stop with the Fake News. For crying out loud. The stupid Fake News propaganda bullshit is so tiresome. God! I am so tired of this crap.