Colorado Christian cakeshop sued a third time for discrimination.

Discussion in 'United States' started by chris155au, Jun 12, 2019.

  1. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, they investigate Civil Rights violations.
     
  2. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,997
    Likes Received:
    13,565
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,150
    Likes Received:
    32,997
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    One of us, probably
     
  4. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,150
    Likes Received:
    32,997
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How does a gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?
     
  5. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Unless you live to be 250 years old, you'll be right along with me.
     
  6. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,150
    Likes Received:
    32,997
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I highly doubt it will take that long, discrimination against entire groups is extremely unpopular especially among my generation and younger. The only two major groups that currently support it are evangelicals (which is ironic seeing that they are the most protected class in America) and the ‘silent generation’ (not silent enough apparently).

    Both groups have a rapidly deteriorating base but are making enough fuss that it will be addressed.
    Their insanity are the main reasons marriage equality happened at such a rapid pace.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2019
  7. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you think it could happen in the future?
     
  8. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  9. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,150
    Likes Received:
    32,997
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Unconstitutional conduct on the side of the CCRC, SCOTUS never said the type of discrimination against the gay couple was legal only that the baker was not treated fairly and equally due to his religious make-belief. The next case will likely follow legal requirements much closer at which point SCOTUS will either impose federal regulation on a state overriding state laws (something the right is sporadically against depending on the topic) at which point constructional amendments will be pushed forward with or SCOTUS will let the CCRC ruling stand at which point evangelicals will scream victim like they have been doing over the past few decades when they don’t get their normal special treatment.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2019
    chris155au likes this.
  10. Yakamaru

    Yakamaru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2018
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    562
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    A third time? People don't learn, do they?

    Quite frankly this is becoming more of a harassment campaign from the looks of it.

    It's a private business, and as such should be allowed to do business with let alone refuse business with whomever they please.

    Is it a good idea to discriminate however? No, it sure as hell ain't.
    But the guy is within his rights as a Federal judge ruled.
     
    chris155au likes this.
  11. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The icing is sweeter
     
    chris155au likes this.
  12. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What do you mean "make-belief?"

    What CCRC ruling?
     
  13. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well within what rights?
     
  14. Yakamaru

    Yakamaru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2018
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    562
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Legal rights. What rights do you think I was otherwise referring to?
     
  15. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah what legal rights?
     
  16. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,997
    Likes Received:
    13,565
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly - (bold). In the discussion I was having the poster posted some dictionary definition of discrimination - which defined the word in a way that included something completely unrelated to the legal definition - having discriminating taste for example.

    I brought up the example that someone preferring blonds to brunettes is not discrimination - as per the legal definition. Rather than show some understanding of what was being explained - the poster went into la la land saying "did you not hear about the ruling in Colorado" and so on.

    This is a typical denial/ thought avoidance/ thought stopping technique of the indoctrinated. Thinking the "bad though" triggers the fear response (that they may be being seduced down the path towards most horrible thing the mind can imagine - eternal torture in the afterlife) - and so they will avoid the "bad thought" at all costs.
     
    cd8ed likes this.
  17. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Fantasy, Myth, Imaginary fairy in the sky from the Bronze Age.
     
  18. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How do you know that it is all of that?
     
  19. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How do you know it's not? As much Faith as you have in your Faith I have Faith in my lack of any. Be that as it may if my god would send me to everlasting perdition because I made a cake for those he disagreed with then he could send me there as well, I would definitely find an eternity of worshipping such a cruel and tyrannical deity to be worse than any hell even an omnipotent entitly could likely devise
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2019
  20. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who cares. A private business has the legal right to refuse entry or service to anyone, at any time, for any reason.
     
  21. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it isn't. It's only against the law to TELL the person why you're refusing to serve them, if it's one of the aforementioned reasons. And you are not legally obliged to tell someone why you're refusing service.
     
  22. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,150
    Likes Received:
    32,997
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your two statements are in direct conflict.
    It if is legal to deny service “for any reason” but to be legal you must lie as to the reason then it is not legal to deny them service for that reason.

    You cannot legally deny a Jewish person service because their religion but you can lie and make up another reason to discriminate against them. Doesn’t make it anymore legal.
     
  23. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...discrimination.557207/page-26#post-1070762082
     
  24. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Did Jack say that his god would send him to everlasting perdition if he baked the cake?
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2019
  25. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Are you saying that Jack didn't tell them why he couldn't serve them?
     

Share This Page