NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault

Pravda is an excellent analogy here. It was communist party controlled media and we now have Democrat controlled media in America. They are essentially the propaganda arm of the DNC

 

If you were a woman would you want to admit that one of your college classmates stuck his penis in your hands, while you were in a drunken stupor????

 

Man, you are on high defense. Either comment on the disgraceful behavior or find something else to do.

 

Kinda hard to make that claim since she doesn't recall the 'rumor'.

 

And that makes it true then?

 

Yes, I wouldn’t allow myself to be violated in that way.

The issue here is the person Clinton’s former lawyer is claiming is the victim, said it never happened.

 

If ten others who were at the same party al recall the situation the fact that the victim who was drunk does not recall it is not unusual.And she was never interrogated by the FBI and neither was Ford or Kavanaugh.The FBI 0nly questioned 5 people it was a whitewash job.

 

Woman make much more embarrassing and humiliating false claims on a pretty regular basis.

Most with far less to gain than the millions of dollars and esteemed status as a leftist victim hero that Blasey Ford has received.

 

Stools for Radicals.I mean,even chicken crap is starting to look
good in comparison.But don't encourage these Unamerican
Non-Journalist types further.They may feel obligated to Prove
just how low they can go.

 

So this is how liberals plan to win 2020? Can they get anymore pathetic?

 

Kavanaugh was interviewed. No need to waste time on ford since she testified...they followed up with her alleged witnesses who didn’t back her story.

Of course they didn’t interview this person, there was no claim that anything happened back then. This is a new claim, oddly by a Clinton lawyer and the alledged victim denies it!!

This is the height of desperation

 

The New York Times should have NEVER run with this unsubstantiated article. They didn't even speak with the so called victim. She has made statements that she does not recall the event ever happening, which they finally admitted to. It was nothing but a hit job

 

You are mixing up alllegations.

No witnesses recalled the allegations made by Ramirez EXCEPT Ramirez who was the accuser In addition she admitted she spent decades not knowing who the perpetrator was until she heard Kavanaugh got nominated.

IN the case of this new accusation the perpetrator is not even Kavanaugh as it is alleged his friends assaulted a woman with HIS penis and in this case the women has no memory of it. Nor was she described as drunk

You simply cannot have it both ways. You cannot say that an accusation is credible when the victim remembers it and equally credible when a victim does not remember it.

 

WHO has paid Blasey Ford a single dime??????

 

Let’s face it, dems simply have no credibility anymore

 

I doubt she got her hundreds of thousands of dollars through crowd funding by one person

 

This was not to appoint the town dogcatcher, it was for a seat on the U.S.SUPREME COURT a LIFETIME appointment.A real investigation should have been conducted not a whitewash.

 

This is true, and that’s why it’s still not ok to make false accusations.

An investigation was conducted. But like a lot of other investigations you all have wanted, you just can’t accept the results.

 

Yes she was obviously paid to commit perjury

 

And our government should not have permitted a person who was not thoroughly investigated be appointed to our SUPREME COURT!!!!!

 

You'll agree that she was paid though, right?

 

The Senate Judiciary committee conducted a thorough investigation.

It was no white wash and you got your wish.

The fact that you willfully ignore that fact is your problem

 

Who is supposedly paying these accusers???

 

Totally