Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

BREAKING: Lisa Page sues DOJ, FBI over alleged privacy violations

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019.

Page 3 of 5
  1. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,985
    Likes Received:
    37,717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No he didn’t. Trump did because they had evidence of the pee tape.
    See how stupid this gets when we just make up ****?
     
    The Mello Guy, Dec 10, 2019
    #51
  2. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I agree that the impeachment hearings were stupid. I said she "might" be facing criminal charges and that is why she filed the lawsuit. Certainly, Bill Barr and Durham would have cause to charge and indict her. She should be worried.
     
    BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019
    #52
  3. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
    BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019
    #53
  4. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Page has no right to privacy. She was a federal employee.
     
    doombug, Dec 10, 2019
    #54
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Page is just pursuing an avenue to try and make a storyline that she is the victim.
     
    Hoosier8, Dec 10, 2019
    #55
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  6. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,341
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Two investigators have refuted cause exists.Enough if enough. Give it up
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
    Yulee, Dec 10, 2019
    #56
  7. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong.

    Every federal device comes with a warning of no expectation of privacy.
     
    vman12, Dec 10, 2019
    #57
    Sanskrit likes this.
  8. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your op link doesnt work.. but the good folks at CNBC have one. I can see no reason why the DOJ should be releasing text messages to reporters outside of a formal indictment..
     
    Egoboy, Dec 10, 2019
    #58
  9. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes and now she claims she is in therapy over it..right before this is going to go to the Senate where the Republicans can call witnesses...

    I see they are trying the WB approach.
     
    RP12, Dec 10, 2019
    #59
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  10. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What cause? Their cause to undo a duly elected official?

    Barr and Durham are not done with their CRIMINAL investigation into the origin of the Russian hoax.

    Lisa Page could be right in the middle of all of it.
     
    BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019
    #60
  11. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which investigation had access to the "missing" texts?
     
    RP12, Dec 10, 2019
    #61
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  12. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for the update, looks like "The Hill" tried to kill their own story or move it.

    Here is her lawsuit:

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/former-fbi-lawyer-lisa-page-sues-justice-department-and-fbi

    UPDATE: The link is back, it was 404 for a short time.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
    BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019
    #62
  13. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,341
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, but they are. But keep hoping. You have been for 4 years now.
     
    Yulee, Dec 10, 2019
    #63
  14. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Updated links:

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/former-fbi-lawyer-lisa-page-sues-justice-department-and-fbi

    https://nypost.com/2019/12/10/forme...s-fbi-justice-department-over-released-texts/

    https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...-sues-doj-fbi-over-alleged-privacy-violations
     
    BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019
    #64
  15. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I read the actual suit you posted... all lawsuits do this, but this sounds dirty and exactly what the DOJ was up to in 2017, trying to tamp down anti-Trump sentiment.

    SNIP
    upload_2019-12-10_16-52-36.png
    ENDSNIP

    If they can prove this "midnight run" happened, somebody's going to be getting some cash... but if they claim specifically what the reporters were told, it's likely they have one of them, for lack of a better word, whistleblowing...

    You know Page has had this lawsuit in the works for a LONG time, apparently waiting for this IG report to come out officially clearing her before filing.

    WHEW!!
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
    Egoboy, Dec 10, 2019
    #65
  16. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,385
    Likes Received:
    12,988
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is true, the Records Act of 1950. That said, they are allowed a limited use of personal access, i.e., booking a vacation.
     
    mdrobster, Dec 10, 2019
    #66
  17. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is there a provision for keeping your plans to prevent the POTUS from getting elected private in there?
     
    vman12, Dec 10, 2019
    #67
  18. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Could be.. perhaps Horowitz relied on that to completely clear her and Pete..

    THAT'S exoneration...
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
    Egoboy, Dec 10, 2019
    #68
  19. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure you go with that.
     
    vman12, Dec 10, 2019
    #69
  20. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, but being on a government phone made them government property. That made them subject to FOIA act requests.

    Live and learn.
     
    Thought Criminal, Dec 10, 2019
    #70
  21. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Link?
     
    Thought Criminal, Dec 10, 2019
    #71
  22. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,341
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To what. My ****ing opinion?
     
    Yulee, Dec 10, 2019
    #72
  23. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You made the claim that Barr and Durham have completed their investigations.

    Are you backing away from that claim?
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
    Thought Criminal, Dec 10, 2019
    #73
  24. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She may have been waiting for the IG report to drop but she should have known that Barr and Durham are conducting a criminal investigation. It would not surprise me, in light of her lawsuit, if she was in contact with them already and they were aware of the charges. Pure speculation, though.

    I am actually looking forward to her in the news and answering questions about this. I hope she has more talks with the DOJ.
     
    BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019
    #74
  25. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,341
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it’s my opinion that the investigation is done. They want to jack around and make all you cultist hard with words. So be it

    I never once claimed anything about Barr or Durham.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
    Yulee, Dec 10, 2019
    #75
Page 3 of 5

Share This Page