Vindman Escorted From White House After Trump’s Senate Acquittal

Says the guy in the media......

You cant make this **** up with a team of writers

 

His direct supervisor said HE HAD CONCERNS over several matters..............end of story, Vindman serves at the pleasure of the President he has no "right" to the position. And his reputation was tarnished by the Democrat witnesses and rightfully so.

And if in fact he leaked classified information to someone who did not have the clearance AND the need to know and knew that person would then leak it to others he could be in BIG trouble.

 

Yeah he COULD be in big trouble if he did that. But there is ZERO evidence that he leaked anything about the call to anyone who wasn’t supposed to know about it.

So go on and keep spreading the lie that he leaked the call to someone he wasn’t supposed to - but you should be aware that repeating a lie will never make it true.

 

Bet Vindman can to better on the PT test than you, Labouroflove.

 

We'll see hopefully as it needs to be fully investigated but his previous history and testimony of his direct supervisor was enough to relieve him of his post.

 

There was a trial.

Did you mean to ask a trial in which you got the conviction you wanted.

Yeah we're using the regular dictionary, not the leftist one.

You know, it's funny.

These are the same people who had nothing to say when Schiff didn't allow the POTUS or Republicans to call witnesses in the basement SCIFs.

Who do you really think you're fooling?

 

Schumer got caught trying to sneak Vindmann back in.

 

Lefties upset because they lost one of their political operatives in the White House.

And the world's tiniest violin began to play...

 

Says the people who nodded their heads with "Russian collusion" for 3 years.

 

Sounds like some self-projection right there.

Keep doing anything you can to denigrate someone who made the right choice to stand up to your Orange Emperor.

 

So why bring him up then?

 

Lefties "lost" someone they didn't even know existed prior to his testimony?

 

FYI,
Traditionally, officials from the US national security council (NSC) brief the president before a call with a foreign leader. Then the briefers sit in the Oval Office with the president while he speaks on the phone with the foreign leader. "At least two members of the NSC are usually present," according to USA Today.

There will also be officials sitting in a secure room in another part of the White House, listening to the president's call and taking notes. Their notes are known as a "memorandum of telephone conversation", and like many things in Washington it has an abbreviation: "memcon".

The president's calls with foreign leaders are also transcribed by computers. Afterwards, as former White House officials explain, the human note takers compare their impressions with an electronic version of the call. The notes from the officials and from the computerised transcriptions are combined into one document. This transcript may not be perfect, but it is done as carefully as time and resources allow.

Officials who work in the executive secretary's office of the US national security council decide on the level of classification for the transcript of a call, explain former White House officials.

 

Did you order the code red???!

 

What "order" he disobey? You are showing your true colors.

 

They do now don't they?

 

You guys keep making excuses. The fact is, you guys lost. It’s over. And now the Dems are in a full blown civil war. You think you’re winning, and that’s great, but you should be concerned. A rational democrat is concerned about this election.

 

"Will be fun watching to see how among other things they try to disprove Bolton’s upcoming book."

Yeah, but who?

 

We will certainly see. We know Trump will make his signature idiotic statements but who will actually try to use facts is TBD.

 

And what is a rational Democrats concern about the election?

 

The Republicans had equal time to question witnesses. That is a fact despite the Republicans lies to the contrary. And they could have called the witnesses in the Senate trial but somehow miraculously the big deal in the House went away in the Senate.

 

So you criteria for a lying President is he has to lie about felonies. Hilarious new Republican standards of honesty.

 

The left hated warmonger Bolton during the Bush years. Now he is their hero and they want to buy his book. LMFAO!

 

Nope. Thanks for proving you cannot answer the question.

 

Why should the Republican Senators waste time and energy calling defense witnesses? The Democrats had no case. Defense witnesses would be superfluous.